If the rookies want to control the numbers they need to get rid of Bananas & Camila early then Jenna, Cohutta, and KellyAnne will probably come over to their side
I wish the rookies would do something big like this!!!!!!!!
Trying to get rid of them is much easier than actually getting rid of them...especially Bananas
Haha true like who the **** is taking bananas out?
No one is going to take Bananas the **** out. That's why it's smart to align with him in a team challenge & hope you do enough to be part of the win. Bananas will be getting his sixth win in my opinion.
I really can't stand you. How is it so entertaining to watch the Banana show over and over?
It's not. Some people just want the same, repetitive shit all the time.
Honestly he isn't wrong, I hate Johnny but hes right why get rid of the person you know will make you money.
Nothing about being "repetitive " its just basic logic to not get rid of the best player on the team...
im hoping for teams to be a mix of alumni and bloodlines. leroy can take out bananas, and maybe cory. i want leroy, nany, camila, nicole and larissa to win.
For those of you who don't understand why its stupid to get rid of him, think of it this way.
What if the gray team got rid of Abram? Is that a smart move? Getting rid of easily your best player?
I agree, it's smart to send him home when he's not helping you make money. But if your on his team you don't get rid of him especially when he's easily the best guy on the team.
Even if he targets you and wants you gone? That's Bullshit.[/quote]
If I don't suck and we're on a team he won't want me gone. If I suck and he wants me gone then no one else should listen to what I want. This would be like Danny-Xtreme trying to rally people against him--good luck with that. There's exceptions to the rule. Lke if Wes and Darrell didn't hate one another they could have possibly teamed up against JEK if Derrick wasn't actually closer to EK & Johnny was. But, if you look at this cast and we have alumni vs. bloodlines who is Aneesa going to team up with--the weak guys and make herself a target?
If you look back at everyone that was targeted in team challenges only Wes & Brandon really have a beef and Wes tried to throw missions because they wouldn't let him dictate the game with the idiotic "draw" idea
Honestly he isn't wrong, I hate Johnny but hes right why get rid of the person you know will make you money. Nothing about being "repetitive " its just basic logic to not get rid of the best player on the team...
He's very right. Bananas knows how to play the game, that I can admit. But I'm sick of him winning time and time again. It makes the show predictable and less fun to watch.
This logic only works for teams. If it were anything else, this "best player" shit would be irrelevant.
For those of you who don't understand why its stupid to get rid of him, think of it this way.
What if the gray team got rid of Abram? Is that a smart move? Getting rid of easily your best player?
But what if Abram was targeting people specifically? Should the the people/person whom is targeted not stand up and get rid of him too? Other people gotta think about their lives in the game too and that's what you(and others) are not getting.
For those of you who don't understand why its stupid to get rid of him, think of it this way.
What if the gray team got rid of Abram? Is that a smart move? Getting rid of easily your best player?
But what if Abram was targeting people specifically? Should the the people/person whom is targeted not stand up and get rid of him too? Other people gotta think about their lives in the game too and that's what you(and others) are not getting.
Do that if you want but know you ain't winning.
Do you honestly believe the gray team would win missions without Abram, they'd be left down to probably Laurel & Sarah tbh.
What you're not getting is they might not win without him, it's your money but you won't get more getting rid of your best player....
For those of you who don't understand why its stupid to get rid of him, think of it this way.
What if the gray team got rid of Abram? Is that a smart move? Getting rid of easily your best player?
But what if Abram was targeting people specifically? Should the the people/person whom is targeted not stand up and get rid of him too? Other people gotta think about their lives in the game too and that's what you(and others) are not getting.
Do that if you want but know you ain't winning.
Do you honestly believe the gray team would win missions without Abram, they'd be left down to probably Laurel & Sarah tbh.
What you're not getting is they might not win without him, it's your money but you won't get more getting rid of your best player....
So they should just sit back and do nothing because he's their best? Okay...
And you do know that they lost WITH Abram so It really didn't make a difference anyway.
For those of you who don't understand why its stupid to get rid of him, think of it this way.
What if the gray team got rid of Abram? Is that a smart move? Getting rid of easily your best player?
But what if Abram was targeting people specifically? Should the the people/person whom is targeted not stand up and get rid of him too? Other people gotta think about their lives in the game too and that's what you(and others) are not getting.
Do that if you want but know you ain't winning.
Do you honestly believe the gray team would win missions without Abram, they'd be left down to probably Laurel & Sarah tbh.
What you're not getting is they might not win without him, it's your money but you won't get more getting rid of your best player....
So they should just sit back and do nothing because he's their best? Okay...
And you do know that they lost WITH Abram so It really didn't make a difference anyway.
I know that but its irrelevant none of the other guys on the gray team had a chance of helping them win.
That's the point, if your being targeted you're probably weak tbh. Getting rid of weak competition is what you do on a team no point in keeping those who suck.
If I went on a challenge and new X number of guys were better than me I'd expect to be throw in every time my team lost and if I can't help my team by winning eliminations I deserve to go home. Sure, I'd try to make a deal to save my *** but I'm not going to expect anyone else to me dumb enough to side with me.
There's a difference between someone like Brad being the top dog and Johnny. If I was Tyler, Dunbar, Paula & Camila I would have turned on Brad & Tori. But if I'm the grey team Katie & Eric aren't convince Emily , Theresa & Ty to turn on Johnny, Derrick & Jenn.
The goal is for the team to win and hopefully I earn my spot at the end
For those of you who don't understand why its stupid to get rid of him, think of it this way.
What if the gray team got rid of Abram? Is that a smart move? Getting rid of easily your best player?
But what if Abram was targeting people specifically? Should the the people/person whom is targeted not stand up and get rid of him too? Other people gotta think about their lives in the game too and that's what you(and others) are not getting.
Do that if you want but know you ain't winning.
Do you honestly believe the gray team would win missions without Abram, they'd be left down to probably Laurel & Sarah tbh.
What you're not getting is they might not win without him, it's your money but you won't get more getting rid of your best player....
So they should just sit back and do nothing because he's their best? Okay...
And you do know that they lost WITH Abram so It really didn't make a difference anyway.
I know that but its irrelevant none of the other guys on the gray team had a chance of helping them win.
That's the point, if your being targeted you're probably weak tbh. Getting rid of weak competition is what you do on a team no point in keeping those who suck.
Coral and Beth were targeted by their team on The Gauntlet 3 despite being good competitors. Evelyn was thrown in on The Ruins despite being their best girl. It isn't always the weak people that get targeted.
And I also like how people are assuming that the newbies will be weak.
For those of you who don't understand why its stupid to get rid of him, think of it this way.
What if the gray team got rid of Abram? Is that a smart move? Getting rid of easily your best player?
But what if Abram was targeting people specifically? Should the the people/person whom is targeted not stand up and get rid of him too? Other people gotta think about their lives in the game too and that's what you(and others) are not getting.
Do that if you want but know you ain't winning.
Do you honestly believe the gray team would win missions without Abram, they'd be left down to probably Laurel & Sarah tbh.
What you're not getting is they might not win without him, it's your money but you won't get more getting rid of your best player....
So they should just sit back and do nothing because he's their best? Okay...
And you do know that they lost WITH Abram so It really didn't make a difference anyway.
I know that but its irrelevant none of the other guys on the gray team had a chance of helping them win.
That's the point, if your being targeted you're probably weak tbh. Getting rid of weak competition is what you do on a team no point in keeping those who suck.
Coral and Beth were targeted by their team on The Gauntlet 3 despite being good competitors. Evelyn was thrown in on The Ruins despite being their best girl. It isn't always the weak people that get targeted.
And I also like how people are assuming that the newbies will be weak.
Look at Tony, what about him makes you think he'll be good. And I like Thomas but he's not in great shape.
Besides if bananas is great at finals why keep unproven people over him try thinking from a logical view not a "everything is repetitive " point if view.
1.) Dario&Twin get a ton of screen time.
2.) Nany hooks up with the entire cast.
3.) Cory wins.
4.) Cohutta and KellyAnne have a super alliance.
5.) I finally start to enjoy Cara Maria.
For those of you who don't understand why its stupid to get rid of him, think of it this way.
What if the gray team got rid of Abram? Is that a smart move? Getting rid of easily your best player?
But what if Abram was targeting people specifically? Should the the people/person whom is targeted not stand up and get rid of him too? Other people gotta think about their lives in the game too and that's what you(and others) are not getting.
Do that if you want but know you ain't winning.
Do you honestly believe the gray team would win missions without Abram, they'd be left down to probably Laurel & Sarah tbh.
What you're not getting is they might not win without him, it's your money but you won't get more getting rid of your best player....
So they should just sit back and do nothing because he's their best? Okay...
And you do know that they lost WITH Abram so It really didn't make a difference anyway.
I know that but its irrelevant none of the other guys on the gray team had a chance of helping them win.
That's the point, if your being targeted you're probably weak tbh. Getting rid of weak competition is what you do on a team no point in keeping those who suck.
Coral and Beth were targeted by their team on The Gauntlet 3 despite being good competitors. Evelyn was thrown in on The Ruins despite being their best girl. It isn't always the weak people that get targeted.
And I also like how people are assuming that the newbies will be weak.
Look at Tony, what about him makes you think he'll be good. And I like Thomas but he's not in great shape.
Besides if bananas is great at finals why keep unproven people over him try thinking from a logical view not a "everything is repetitive " point if view.
You can't just look at somebody and tell if they'll be good or not. I highly doubt anyone thought Kimberly would've been as good as she was when she came on. Tony could be the same way. Same for the others too.
And Backpack is not the only one that has been in a final on that team...they don't need him that much.
For those of you who don't understand why its stupid to get rid of him, think of it this way.
What if the gray team got rid of Abram? Is that a smart move? Getting rid of easily your best player?
But what if Abram was targeting people specifically? Should the the people/person whom is targeted not stand up and get rid of him too? Other people gotta think about their lives in the game too and that's what you(and others) are not getting.
Do that if you want but know you ain't winning.
Do you honestly believe the gray team would win missions without Abram, they'd be left down to probably Laurel & Sarah tbh.
What you're not getting is they might not win without him, it's your money but you won't get more getting rid of your best player....
So they should just sit back and do nothing because he's their best? Okay...
And you do know that they lost WITH Abram so It really didn't make a difference anyway.
I know that but its irrelevant none of the other guys on the gray team had a chance of helping them win.
That's the point, if your being targeted you're probably weak tbh. Getting rid of weak competition is what you do on a team no point in keeping those who suck.
Coral and Beth were targeted by their team on The Gauntlet 3 despite being good competitors. Evelyn was thrown in on The Ruins despite being their best girl. It isn't always the weak people that get targeted.
And I also like how people are assuming that the newbies will be weak.
Look at Tony, what about him makes you think he'll be good. And I like Thomas but he's not in great shape.
Besides if bananas is great at finals why keep unproven people over him try thinking from a logical view not a "everything is repetitive " point if view.
You can't just look at somebody and tell if they'll be good or not. I highly doubt anyone thought Kimberly would've been as good as she was when she came on. Tony could be the same way. Same for the others too.
And Backpack is not the only one that has been in a final on that team...they don't need him that much.
I didn't say he was, I said he's great at finals Leroy is the only other guy whose seen a final.
A lot of times you can, look at Simone Brittany Casey big easy Preston Anastasia Naomi countless others who you knew would be bad.
] Coral and Beth were targeted by their team on The Gauntlet 3 despite being good competitors. Evelyn was thrown in on The Ruins despite being their best girl. It isn't always the weak people that get targeted. And I also like how people are assuming that the newbies will be weak.
Coral and Beth were targetted because they have a voice.
Evelyn was throw in because they wanted to get rid of KellyAnne to punish Wes--had nothing to do with her.
Cory won't be weak. Other than that the new alumni don't look impressive. I love Kimberly but Kimberly wasn't a beast where she'd be able to take out a top-tier player.
We'll find out soon enough how strong they are. I'd love to see new people step up. That's why I'm happy about Cory being on.
For those of you who don't understand why its stupid to get rid of him, think of it this way. What if the gray team got rid of Abram? Is that a smart move? Getting rid of easily your best player?
But what if Abram was targeting people specifically? Should the the people/person whom is targeted not stand up and get rid of him too? Other people gotta think about their lives in the game too and that's what you(and others) are not getting.
Do that if you want but know you ain't winning. Do you honestly believe the gray team would win missions without Abram, they'd be left down to probably Laurel & Sarah tbh. What you're not getting is they might not win without him, it's your money but you won't get more getting rid of your best player....
So they should just sit back and do nothing because he's their best? Okay... And you do know that they lost WITH Abram so It really didn't make a difference anyway.
I know that but its irrelevant none of the other guys on the gray team had a chance of helping them win. That's the point, if your being targeted you're probably weak tbh. Getting rid of weak competition is what you do on a team no point in keeping those who suck.
Coral and Beth were targeted by their team on The Gauntlet 3 despite being good competitors. Evelyn was thrown in on The Ruins despite being their best girl. It isn't always the weak people that get targeted. And I also like how people are assuming that the newbies will be weak.
Look at Tony, what about him makes you think he'll be good. And I like Thomas but he's not in great shape. Besides if bananas is great at finals why keep unproven people over him try thinking from a logical view not a "everything is repetitive " point if view.
You can't just look at somebody and tell if they'll be good or not. I highly doubt anyone thought Kimberly would've been as good as she was when she came on. Tony could be the same way. Same for the others too. And Backpack is not the only one that has been in a final on that team...they don't need him that much.
I didn't say he was, I said he's great at finals Leroy is the only other guy whose seen a final. A lot of times you can, look at Simone Brittany Casey big easy Preston Anastasia Naomi countless others who you knew would be bad.
You didn't say it but you sure act like it....
But even still..Tony can still surprise, we gotta see him in action.
] Coral and Beth were targeted by their team on The Gauntlet 3 despite being good competitors. Evelyn was thrown in on The Ruins despite being their best girl. It isn't always the weak people that get targeted. And I also like how people are assuming that the newbies will be weak.
Coral and Beth were targetted because they have a voice.
Evelyn was throw in because they wanted to get rid of KellyAnne to punish Wes--had nothing to do with her.
Cory won't be weak. Other than that the new alumni don't look impressive. I love Kimberly but Kimberly wasn't a beast where she'd be able to take out a top-tier player.
We'll find out soon enough how strong they are. I'd love to see new people step up. That's why I'm happy about Cory being on.
And Cory has a voice and is not afraid to use it either so how do you know he won't suffer the same fate? Let's assume that he is strong competitor they would still throw him in because they wouldn't be able to control him..or make him go against his bloodline for the same reason..that whole "he won't throw me in if I'm strong" thing goes right out the window. Just like it did with Coral/Beth/Evelyn. You really gotta remember how politics on this show works. People will work with their friends and anyone else who isn't in "the in crowd" or popular gets gets the target on their back..regardless of how weak/strong they are.
] Coral and Beth were targeted by their team on The Gauntlet 3 despite being good competitors. Evelyn was thrown in on The Ruins despite being their best girl. It isn't always the weak people that get targeted. And I also like how people are assuming that the newbies will be weak.
Coral and Beth were targetted because they have a voice.
Evelyn was throw in because they wanted to get rid of KellyAnne to punish Wes--had nothing to do with her.
Cory won't be weak. Other than that the new alumni don't look impressive. I love Kimberly but Kimberly wasn't a beast where she'd be able to take out a top-tier player.
We'll find out soon enough how strong they are. I'd love to see new people step up. That's why I'm happy about Cory being on.
And Cory has a voice and is not afraid to use it either so how do you know he won't suffer the same fate? Let's assume that he is strong competitor they would still throw him in because they wouldn't be able to control him..or make him go against his bloodline for the same reason..that whole "he won't throw me in if I'm strong" thing goes right out the window. Just like it did with Coral/Beth/Evelyn. You really gotta remember how politics on this show works. People will work with their friends and anyone else who isn't in "the in crowd" or popular gets gets the target on their back..regardless of how weak/strong they are.
We'll see if Cory's smart enough to play the game. I'd play the game because I'd be there to win not make a point. Coral dictated everything for years as did Veronica. Few had a problem with that. Johnny & Derrick picked up Ty & Emily right away because they could help. Cory can absolutely be the 4th guy with Johnny, Leroy & Cohutta and if he outperforms Cohutta he jumps to #3. Darrell played the game on The Ruins so have countless others...if you're not willing there's no point in showing up.
1. Cara Maria (her new picture on the spoiler thread is bad *** and sexy and she deserves to finally win)
2. KellyAnne (excited for her return, she has a great chance. Her winning with Cohutta would be everything to me.)
3. Aneesa (it's been over a decade since her first challenge, please FINALLY win and go out with a bang. She's like the Leonardo DiCaprio of The Challenge.)
4. Nany (I think she will be the new Jenn and go far due to politics, no way she is leaving early. Wouldn't mind seeing her win)
5. Camila (she has already won so I don't care to see her get another victory)
6. Jenna (bye)
7. Christina (I don't even watch AYTO so I could care less)
Men
1. Cohutta (this guy would kill it in a final, one of the most likable cast members ever)
2. Cory (I want to see him dominate and be a rare rookie in the new era to win his first challenge)
3. Tony (Hope he surprises some people)
4. Thomas (He's an underdog and I want to see him do well with Cory)
5. Leroy (He's a follower so I don't care him to see him win)
6. Bananas (He's won 5 times and that's honestly enough, I don't want to see his head get bigger)
The only reason I kinda hope Cory doesn't do well is because during his reunion he rubbed me the wrong way saying he could easily win a challenge. Too cocky in my opinion.
] Coral and Beth were targeted by their team on The Gauntlet 3 despite being good competitors. Evelyn was thrown in on The Ruins despite being their best girl. It isn't always the weak people that get targeted. And I also like how people are assuming that the newbies will be weak.
Coral and Beth were targetted because they have a voice.
Evelyn was throw in because they wanted to get rid of KellyAnne to punish Wes--had nothing to do with her.
Cory won't be weak. Other than that the new alumni don't look impressive. I love Kimberly but Kimberly wasn't a beast where she'd be able to take out a top-tier player.
We'll find out soon enough how strong they are. I'd love to see new people step up. That's why I'm happy about Cory being on.
And Cory has a voice and is not afraid to use it either so how do you know he won't suffer the same fate? Let's assume that he is strong competitor they would still throw him in because they wouldn't be able to control him..or make him go against his bloodline for the same reason..that whole "he won't throw me in if I'm strong" thing goes right out the window. Just like it did with Coral/Beth/Evelyn. You really gotta remember how politics on this show works. People will work with their friends and anyone else who isn't in "the in crowd" or popular gets gets the target on their back..regardless of how weak/strong they are.
We'll see if Cory's smart enough to play the game. I'd play the game because I'd be there to win not make a point. Coral dictated everything for years as did Veronica. Few had a problem with that. Johnny & Derrick picked up Ty & Emily right away because they could help. Cory can absolutely be the 4th guy with Johnny, Leroy & Cohutta and if he outperforms Cohutta he jumps to #3. Darrell played the game on The Ruins so have countless others...if you're not willing there's no point in showing up.
Well with Coral and Veronica I think that in that time they did mainly big team challenges and most people on a single team made it to the end anways so most people had no issue with them running things consdiering they were more than likely going to the end anywas(plus they had alot of friends and were assets to their teams). Had there been more partner and indivutual challenges then I think they definetly been targeted(or maybe not considering they had ALOT of freinds there as I stated before)
But yeah..with Cory if he is strong and they don't put him on the outs then it would be in his best interest to work with the vets. I'd do the same thing. it's just when you are strong and they target you for other reasons...then that's different and it wouldn't be about proving a point then.
1. Cara Maria (her new picture on the spoiler thread is bad *** and sexy and she deserves to finally win)
2. KellyAnne (excited for her return, she has a great chance. Her winning with Cohutta would be everything to me.)
3. Aneesa (it's been over a decade since her first challenge, please FINALLY win and go out with a bang. She's like the Leonardo DiCaprio of The Challenge.)
4. Nany (I think she will be the new Jenn and go far due to politics, no way she is leaving early. Wouldn't mind seeing her win)
5. Camila (she has already won so I don't care to see her get another victory)
6. Jenna (bye)
7. Christina (I don't even watch AYTO so I could care less)
All I need is a Aneesa win like that's the only person I want to see win , Since my gut is telling me it's pairs so hopefully Cory's Bloodline looks just like him and is a male and is Aneesa Partner , and they pull the win.
Honestly he isn't wrong, I hate Johnny but hes right why get rid of the person you know will make you money.
Nothing about being "repetitive " its just basic logic to not get rid of the best player on the team...
Basic logic escapes many on Vevmo.
im hoping for teams to be a mix of alumni and bloodlines. leroy can take out bananas, and maybe cory. i want leroy, nany, camila, nicole and larissa to win.
For those of you who don't understand why its stupid to get rid of him, think of it this way.
What if the gray team got rid of Abram? Is that a smart move? Getting rid of easily your best player?
If I don't suck and we're on a team he won't want me gone. If I suck and he wants me gone then no one else should listen to what I want. This would be like Danny-Xtreme trying to rally people against him--good luck with that. There's exceptions to the rule. Lke if Wes and Darrell didn't hate one another they could have possibly teamed up against JEK if Derrick wasn't actually closer to EK & Johnny was. But, if you look at this cast and we have alumni vs. bloodlines who is Aneesa going to team up with--the weak guys and make herself a target?
If you look back at everyone that was targeted in team challenges only Wes & Brandon really have a beef and Wes tried to throw missions because they wouldn't let him dictate the game with the idiotic "draw" idea
He's very right. Bananas knows how to play the game, that I can admit. But I'm sick of him winning time and time again. It makes the show predictable and less fun to watch.
This logic only works for teams. If it were anything else, this "best player" shit would be irrelevant.
But what if Abram was targeting people specifically? Should the the people/person whom is targeted not stand up and get rid of him too? Other people gotta think about their lives in the game too and that's what you(and others) are not getting.
Do that if you want but know you ain't winning.
Do you honestly believe the gray team would win missions without Abram, they'd be left down to probably Laurel & Sarah tbh.
What you're not getting is they might not win without him, it's your money but you won't get more getting rid of your best player....
Keeping Bananas makes sense in a team format.
Targeting Bananas makes sense in an individual/pair format if you have the numbers to do it.
So they should just sit back and do nothing because he's their best? Okay...
And you do know that they lost WITH Abram so It really didn't make a difference anyway.
I know that but its irrelevant none of the other guys on the gray team had a chance of helping them win.
That's the point, if your being targeted you're probably weak tbh. Getting rid of weak competition is what you do on a team no point in keeping those who suck.
If I went on a challenge and new X number of guys were better than me I'd expect to be throw in every time my team lost and if I can't help my team by winning eliminations I deserve to go home. Sure, I'd try to make a deal to save my *** but I'm not going to expect anyone else to me dumb enough to side with me.
There's a difference between someone like Brad being the top dog and Johnny. If I was Tyler, Dunbar, Paula & Camila I would have turned on Brad & Tori. But if I'm the grey team Katie & Eric aren't convince Emily , Theresa & Ty to turn on Johnny, Derrick & Jenn.
The goal is for the team to win and hopefully I earn my spot at the end
So, what'd I miss? Any word on if it's individual or pairs?
Coral and Beth were targeted by their team on The Gauntlet 3 despite being good competitors. Evelyn was thrown in on The Ruins despite being their best girl. It isn't always the weak people that get targeted.
And I also like how people are assuming that the newbies will be weak.
Look at Tony, what about him makes you think he'll be good. And I like Thomas but he's not in great shape.
Besides if bananas is great at finals why keep unproven people over him try thinking from a logical view not a "everything is repetitive " point if view.
My hopes and dreams for this season....
1.) Dario&Twin get a ton of screen time.
2.) Nany hooks up with the entire cast.
3.) Cory wins.
4.) Cohutta and KellyAnne have a super alliance.
5.) I finally start to enjoy Cara Maria.
You can't just look at somebody and tell if they'll be good or not. I highly doubt anyone thought Kimberly would've been as good as she was when she came on. Tony could be the same way. Same for the others too.
And Backpack is not the only one that has been in a final on that team...they don't need him that much.
I didn't say he was, I said he's great at finals Leroy is the only other guy whose seen a final.
A lot of times you can, look at Simone Brittany Casey big easy Preston Anastasia Naomi countless others who you knew would be bad.
Coral and Beth were targetted because they have a voice.
Evelyn was throw in because they wanted to get rid of KellyAnne to punish Wes--had nothing to do with her.
Cory won't be weak. Other than that the new alumni don't look impressive. I love Kimberly but Kimberly wasn't a beast where she'd be able to take out a top-tier player.
We'll find out soon enough how strong they are. I'd love to see new people step up. That's why I'm happy about Cory being on.
You didn't say it but you sure act like it....
But even still..Tony can still surprise, we gotta see him in action.
And Cory has a voice and is not afraid to use it either so how do you know he won't suffer the same fate? Let's assume that he is strong competitor they would still throw him in because they wouldn't be able to control him..or make him go against his bloodline for the same reason..that whole "he won't throw me in if I'm strong" thing goes right out the window. Just like it did with Coral/Beth/Evelyn. You really gotta remember how politics on this show works. People will work with their friends and anyone else who isn't in "the in crowd" or popular gets gets the target on their back..regardless of how weak/strong they are.
We'll see if Cory's smart enough to play the game. I'd play the game because I'd be there to win not make a point. Coral dictated everything for years as did Veronica. Few had a problem with that. Johnny & Derrick picked up Ty & Emily right away because they could help. Cory can absolutely be the 4th guy with Johnny, Leroy & Cohutta and if he outperforms Cohutta he jumps to #3. Darrell played the game on The Ruins so have countless others...if you're not willing there's no point in showing up.
Watch there be not a lot of hook ups
I honestly doubt Nany will hook up with anyone besides Cohutta , Exes 2 was definitely her wake up call.
Rankings of who I want to win for the alumni
Women
1. Cara Maria (her new picture on the spoiler thread is bad *** and sexy and she deserves to finally win)
2. KellyAnne (excited for her return, she has a great chance. Her winning with Cohutta would be everything to me.)
4. Nany (I think she will be the new Jenn and go far due to politics, no way she is leaving early. Wouldn't mind seeing her win)
5. Camila (she has already won so I don't care to see her get another victory)
6. Jenna (bye)
7. Christina (I don't even watch AYTO so I could care less)
Men
1. Cohutta (this guy would kill it in a final, one of the most likable cast members ever)
2. Cory (I want to see him dominate and be a rare rookie in the new era to win his first challenge)
3. Tony (Hope he surprises some people)
4. Thomas (He's an underdog and I want to see him do well with Cory)
5. Leroy (He's a follower so I don't care him to see him win)
6. Bananas (He's won 5 times and that's honestly enough, I don't want to see his head get bigger)
7. Dario (Don't care)
The only reason I kinda hope Cory doesn't do well is because during his reunion he rubbed me the wrong way saying he could easily win a challenge. Too cocky in my opinion.
Well with Coral and Veronica I think that in that time they did mainly big team challenges and most people on a single team made it to the end anways so most people had no issue with them running things consdiering they were more than likely going to the end anywas(plus they had alot of friends and were assets to their teams). Had there been more partner and indivutual challenges then I think they definetly been targeted(or maybe not considering they had ALOT of freinds there as I stated before)
But yeah..with Cory if he is strong and they don't put him on the outs then it would be in his best interest to work with the vets. I'd do the same thing. it's just when you are strong and they target you for other reasons...then that's different and it wouldn't be about proving a point then.
YA***S
All I need is a Aneesa win like that's the only person I want to see win , Since my gut is telling me it's pairs so hopefully Cory's Bloodline looks just like him and is a male and is Aneesa Partner , and they pull the win.
I agree. After free agents I I honestly don't think she would go around hooking up, especially with him there
Pages