[QUOTE=Bacchus;323300]Exactly. Their run defense is 32 of 32 in the NFL.[/QUOTE]
CJ probably won't be this good again, but he did show potential 2 weeks ago running for over 140 against Houston.
[QUOTE=TheFeedMachi;323302]CJ probably won't be this good again, but he did show potential 2 weeks ago running for over 140 against Houston.[/QUOTE]
He was solid against the Steelers last week as well
[QUOTE=kvm1977;323298]Yeah, Buffalo's defense is so bad that it is a flashblack to the 2009 version of CJ[/QUOTE]
If there's any game for CJ2K to look like CJ2K, it's going to be this one.
[QUOTE=kvm1977;323303]He was solid against the Steelers last week as well[/QUOTE]
He scored ZERO fantasy points in between those two games with 24 yards and a fumble lost against Minnesota. I'd rather be getting 5 a week from a guy rather than 10, 0 10, 0.
Anyway, he is not my problem anymore and I am thankful for that. The ********* are going to look like ********* if they start CJ over two clearly better backs and he tosses up another goose egg next week.
[QUOTE=Bacchus;323306]He scored ZERO fantasy points in between those two games with 24 yards and a fumble lost against Minnesota. I'd rather be getting 5 a week from a guy rather than 10, 0 10, 0.
Anyway, he is not my problem anymore and I am thankful for that. The ********* are going to look like ********* if they start CJ over two clearly better backs and he tosses up another goose egg next week.[/QUOTE]
Trust me, I know--I own him in my big money league as well. The inconsistency is a killer. I remember very well just praying he'd get back to "zero" after an early fumble in one of those games. Just saying he's been looking a little better as of late.
I am not a fan of either the Giants or Skins, but this game is off the hook right now! Jackalope must be happy as things were not looking good until that Cruz bomb.
I'd say *** Clowns got the better end of that trade.... so far. He had 5 starting players on bye this week so he pretty much HAD to start Johnson, and what a time for him to explode like that. And there are worse places to be when you can say he's your 4th RB on your roster.
Cruz bomb... meh. I'm not happy. This is shaping up to be the third week in a row where my roster as a collective underachieves and earns ~20 pts less than was projected for them. If the system actually allowed me to, I would have already dumped my entire roster for some WW gems.
I have 4 trade proposals pending acceptance, all involving the 49ers DST and Calvin Johnson. Would you like those 2 playing for you? Then log in and check to see if you have a pending trade proposal!
If you need a WR, feel free to send me any trade proposals. I have a wide variety ranging from solid #1 WR to young guy with upside. Of course, if you want one of my starters, you need to give me a player that I can start in return, which is only at the QB position.
[QUOTE=TheFeedMachi;323489]If you need a WR, feel free to send me any trade proposals. I have a wide variety ranging from solid #1 WR to young guy with upside. Of course, if you want one of my starters, you need to give me a player that I can start in return, which is only at the QB position.[/QUOTE]
Heh, I don't have a starting QB.
[B][U]Today's fun fact[/U][/B]
If the playoffs were held today using the standings through week 7 the matchups would be:
CuttySarks @ ZombieSquirrels
copples16 @ *********
Shocking, right? Muahahahaha. :devil2:
[QUOTE=Bacchus;323554][B][U]Today's fun fact[/U][/B]
If the playoffs were held today using the standings through week 7 the matchups would be:
CuttySarks @ ZombieSquirrels
copples16 @ *********
Shocking, right? Muahahahaha. :devil2:[/QUOTE]
It is a shame because you are about to lose and fall out of the wildcard race entirely.
[QUOTE=TheFeedMachi;323555]It is a shame because you are about to lose and fall out of the wildcard race entirely.[/QUOTE]
[strike]I'm confused. Don't I play you this week?[/strike]
[B]Edit: [/B]You got out to quite a good start TFM. ;)
[QUOTE=Bacchus;323557][strike]I'm confused. Don't I play you this week?[/strike]
[B]Edit: [/B]You got out to quite a good start TFM. ;)[/QUOTE]
Man. You better hope that Decker, Moore, Dreesen, and Tynes can outscore Miles Austin by 52 points.
[QUOTE=TheFeedMachi;324408]Man. You better hope that Decker, Moore, Dreesen, and Tynes can outscore Miles Austin by 52 points.[/QUOTE]
You must have found a four leaf clover this week...
What can I say, you caught every imaginable break and already have more points than you have scored in any other matchup this season. Gronkowski was borderline even playing and instead of a goose egg threw up 26 and Luck caught a break being able to get extra time on the clock (overtime) to repair his poor week. Throw in a defensive touchdown by the Pack and it's a trifecta!
That's how the cookie crumbles.
[QUOTE=Bacchus;324415]You must have found a four leaf clover this week...
What can I say, you caught every imaginable break and already have more points than you have scored in any other matchup this season. Gronkowski was borderline even playing and instead of a goose egg threw up 26 and Luck caught a break being able to get extra time on the clock (overtime) to repair his poor week. Throw in a defensive touchdown by the Pack and it's a trifecta!
That's how the cookie crumbles.[/QUOTE]
Gronk was questionable the last 2 weeks also and still played. I wasn't worried about him potentially not playing. It seems to me like he was questionable because Bill Belichick likes to do stuff like that.
[QUOTE=TheFeedMachi;324417]Gronk was questionable the last 2 weeks also and still played. I wasn't worried about him potentially not playing. It seems to me like he was questionable because Bill Belichick likes to do stuff like that.[/QUOTE]
With Hernandez out, I don't think there was any way he couldn't play. I don't even know who the other TE is on that team.
[QUOTE=TheFeedMachi;324417]Gronk was questionable the last 2 weeks also and still played. I wasn't worried about him potentially not playing. It seems to me like he was questionable because Bill Belichick likes to do stuff like that.[/QUOTE]
Belichick is notorious for stuff like calling most of his good players questionable. It's just mind games with him. Molds is right, he will play unless he's dying, what with Hernandez out.
Bacchus, look at the bright side. My season is over. I couldn't even beat a guy who had 3 players out this week, after making relevant WW and trade moves. So you're only competing with *** Clowns/Wallflowers for the Division and Wild Card slot.
[QUOTE=Aereas;324443]
Bacchus, look at the bright side. My season is over. I couldn't even beat a guy who had 3 players out this week, after making relevant WW and trade moves. So you're only competing with *** Clowns/Wallflowers for the Division and Wild Card slot.[/QUOTE]
Don't throw this week out the window yet. Brees could trip on his shoelaces coming out of the tunnel and break a leg. Then it would be almost even money on you pulling out a miracle. ;)
On a side note, my WW flier, Jonathan Dwyer, got me as many points as CJ and Roethlisberger outscored Vick. That's a net positive as far as I am concerned.
[QUOTE=molds13;324950]Hard to win any matchup when one guy puts up 45 ******* points.
**** you, Doug Martin.[/QUOTE]
No it isn't.
About to get my 4th straight win. My team has caught fire. After this week, I will have a positive point differential for the first time this year, despite being 3rd in scoring for the year entering this week.
[QUOTE=Bacchus;324956]I made a questionable call pulling Vick at the last minute for Roethlisberger. I'll probably pay for it.[/QUOTE]
Why would you do that? The Saints defense is atrocious
[QUOTE=TheFeedMachi;324952]No it isn't.
About to get my 4th straight win. My team has caught fire.[/QUOTE]
Also known as peaking early. Your collapse is just on the horizon. :wink:
There were a ton of high scorers this week, but the game with the 2 teams with the best records could have their point totals for this week combined be outscored by 6 different teams.
Pages