The Challenge Series: RW/RR (Generic Thread)

10404 posts / 0 new
Last post
[QUOTE=Spinner554;131250]Did she tell you on Myspace or something? Cool! :D[/QUOTE] If you look at the pics I posted, it was on facebook.
[QUOTE=darkking01;131245]they should get a UFC fighter and make the most extremely physical show in history wth eleminations that involve tackling and punching[/QUOTE] *flashback to Big Rig on Daisy of Love in the MMA Challenge :) *
Least Likely Challenge Cast Aaron Dominic Kevin Powell Irene Jacinda Jamie Chung Jo(How did she end up on the Gauntlet 2?) Patrick(Road Rules) Chadwick and Holly Greg Brynn Charlie Lacey
Don't forget to add Kimbo to that list ;)
[QUOTE=SteveSparxx;131400]Don't forget to add Kimbo to that list ;)[/QUOTE] Indeed!:D I would also add Melanie from Philly to that list, realistically speaking. She's a teacher in her hometown nowadays, and to this day never seemed to me to be in ANY hurry to do a Challenge. As for Sarah from Philly, i think she must've already finished law school but i'm still 50-50 as to would she or not? Considering how much drama she was able to bring to Philly; has anyone forgotten the infamous "Passion of the you-know-who" conversation with MJ; she'd be a worthy addition to the Challenge roster IMO.
Why do Evan and Kenny think that Katie is the worst challenger ever? Katie has had her fair share of elimination wins. I can name multiple people that were/are way worse than her. Plus, she is probibaly one of the most loved challengers, by the fans.
I can already name two who are worse: Leah and Mallory For Guys: Tyrie
Don't forget Casey, Rachel(Austin), Melinda, Shavoun, Brooke. Guys: Adam, Ryan, Nick, Ace
You really think Rachel (Austin), Melinda, and Nick were worse than Katie. Maybe you could make an argument for Nick, but Rachel won a G3 and Melinda was a decent competitor.
Rachel And Melinda both suck! The only reason Rachel won is because of a lame dq and frank.. I recall Katie beating men in the inferno!! And winning the final mission.
I like Rachel a lot but she only won because she never had to go in the gauntlet. If Jill had lost one of her gauntlets Rachel probibaly would have been out next. Melinda never really did much. Add Brooke to that list, too.
I think Melinda is better than Katie, Rachel is iffy. She won G3, but she was protected by the Austin alliance. On I3, I think Susie picked Rachel because she seemed the weakest link even though she said that it was because she believed Rachel could win.
Isn't Katie the only female to ever win an Inferno against a man?
Brooke and Shauvon are def way worse than Katie, I think even Montana was worse than Katie. Possibly Cameran too, she never proved herself and had zero competitive spirit.
Anonymous
Anonymous's picture
[QUOTE=salt&vinegar;131636]Isn't Katie the only female to ever win an Inferno against a man?[/QUOTE] Your counting that nut *** inferno where it had NOTHING to do with athletic ability. Katie is a nice girl, she's entertaining for challenges, but she is not athletic. AT all.
Katie definetly isn't athletic but she isn't a horrible challenger.
Anonymous
Anonymous's picture
[QUOTE=salt&vinegar;131653]Katie definetly isn't athletic but she isn't a horrible challenger.[/QUOTE] Yeah, she is, as well as, Casey, and others. And Katie admits it. Do I think Katie's hilarious and entertaining? Yes. Would I want her on my team? No. I'm saying this as a fan.
Katie vs. David was a simple endurance/hold your breath competition. The only upside for her was that it was stinky stuff that was in the container and not water. Considering how everyone knew by then that Katie smoked about 5 packs a day, if the Inferno had been holding your breath in plain and simple water, i believe David would've won. The stinky stuff was just too much for David to handle, especially since he couldn't have survived the milk and cookies elimination had CT not stepped in and spared him his fate.
I guess that this a difference of opinion but I think that Katie is an average competetor. I will admit that was one of the silliest competitions ever, but it was still a win.
Brooke, Cameran, Shauvon, Colie, Leah... they are also weak in the history of the challenges :victory:
[QUOTE=gamer73;131760]How did Casey from that one show on MTV drink underaged?[/QUOTE] She was in a country where the drinking age is 18.
[QUOTE=molds13;131765]She was in a country where the drinking age is 18.[/QUOTE] Austrailia's drinking age is 18? I didn't know that.
[QUOTE=molds13;131765]She was in a country where the drinking age is 18.[/QUOTE] Oh,so on The Real World was Svetlana allowed to drink?
[QUOTE=Spinner554;131768]Austrailia's drinking age is 18? I didn't know that.[/QUOTE] Sigh...Google is your friend. Fresh Meat-Australia-18 The Duel-Brazil-18 Gauntlet III-Mexico-old enough to see over the bar (or 18) Ruins-Thailand-18
[QUOTE=gamer73;131769]Oh,so on The Real World was Svetlana allowed to drink?[/QUOTE] No, she was in Florida. Well, Key West.
[QUOTE=gamer73;131769]Oh,so on The Real World was Svetlana allowed to drink?[/QUOTE] Is that question for real? Svetlana was not legally allowed to drink, as she was in the United States. In case you need reminding, the legal drinking age in the United States is 21.
[QUOTE=molds13;131772]Is that question for real? Svetlana was not legally allowed to drink, as she was in the United States. In case you need reminding, the legal drinking age in the United States is 21.[/QUOTE] I know lol. But wasn't she drinking. Wouldn't the production stop her since she isn't legal?
[QUOTE=gamer73;131773]I know lol. But wasn't she drinking. [B]Wouldn't the production stop her since she isn't legal?[/B][/QUOTE] Well, it is the "Real" World.
[QUOTE=gamer73;131773]I know lol. But wasn't she drinking. Wouldn't the production stop her since she isn't legal?[/QUOTE] Like I said before, production doesn't care about their competitors.
OtherPplsDrama
Anonymous's picture
EDIT: Um, nevermind. I thought I was in the a different thread. :o

Pages

Topic locked