Too bad they'll edit it out or at least all the good spots...but then wonder why ratings are so low that they have to budget cut.
are you not literally squealing about your All-Stars seasons rewatch? which wasn't well received and had people sitting in rooms wondering what audience and demo they should advertise to lol
are you not literally squealing about your All-Stars seasons rewatch? which wasn't well received and had people sitting in rooms wondering what audience and demo they should advertise to lol
What is your point? I enjoyed All-Stars but yes it was terribly edited just like all their products. Yes, they have a marketing and identity crisis. Even with all that it was well-received enough for 4 seasons and I saw a plethora of my favorites that I never thought in a million years I'd see again. Even with it's hundreds of flaws I am thankful for it!! We get it you work in tv and have a knowledge of advertising and ratings. Was the point of your post just to flex that?
are you not literally squealing about your All-Stars seasons rewatch? which wasn't well received and had people sitting in rooms wondering what audience and demo they should advertise to lol
What is your point? I enjoyed All-Stars but yes it was terribly edited just like all their products. Yes, they have a marketing and identity crisis. Even with all that it was well-received enough for 4 seasons and I saw a plethora of my favorites that I never thought in a million years I'd see again. Even with it's hundreds of flaws I am thankful for it!! We get it you work in tv and have a knowledge of advertising and ratings. Was the point of your post just to flex that?
I kinda just wanted to see you meltdown the second you read it and give me a paragraph. It was pretty easy to accomplish all things considered.
are you not literally squealing about your All-Stars seasons rewatch? which wasn't well received and had people sitting in rooms wondering what audience and demo they should advertise to lol
What is your point? I enjoyed All-Stars but yes it was terribly edited just like all their products. Yes, they have a marketing and identity crisis. Even with all that it was well-received enough for 4 seasons and I saw a plethora of my favorites that I never thought in a million years I'd see again. Even with it's hundreds of flaws I am thankful for it!! We get it you work in tv and have a knowledge of advertising and ratings. Was the point of your post just to flex that?
I kinda just wanted to see you meltdown the second you read it and give me a paragraph. It was pretty easy to accomplish all things considered.
that's not a meltdown. a meltdown is what kvm had during all stars 3
I'm not bad about Tori/Kam. They about even and basically the same player. Pick whichever one you think is better. Kam beat Tori in an elimination that didn't matter for Tori though.
Laurel > Cara though. Cara was a sidekick for too long IMO. I also think Emily Schromm is easily top 8.
Tyler losing us great though Josh would have been a better update.
For the Kam/Tori debate, I got to give it to Kam. She's smarter than Tori and has played more creatively and with more agility (strategically). Agree they're similar strength/fitness wise.
Dear god they got decimated. Is this the worst performance from an "alliance"?
they had no shot with this format, it was designed to get all the vets to the end
this isn't survivor they could have won an elimination. Paulie literally asked to go against John.
Also Amanda and Jonna are literally vets
that's true they could've won elims, but with the format the odds of them ever pulling off a "comeback" were insurmountable. When 90% of the house is constantly throwing their name in, what do you think is the most likely scenario? you're a smart guy let's be real.
this format with the lottery would've saved the global season with the teams so divided
jonna is an "all star" that'd be like calling MJ or Yes a "vet" when they are in no ways part of that big alliance.
Dear god they got decimated. Is this the worst performance from an "alliance"?
they had no shot with this format, it was designed to get all the vets to the end
Tell me the format these guys had a chance at ? Lmao nah they could of went in played nice and got some numbers socially. Being loud and annoying isn't a good strategy also Michaels personaluty does not fit this group lol
two loud mouths. should be interesting
tori is a good competitor but she is not this great finals runner ppl hype her out to be
That would be dumb. I would not be surprised, tho. Tiff is great TV, and Josh...is Josh.
are you not literally squealing about your All-Stars seasons rewatch? which wasn't well received and had people sitting in rooms wondering what audience and demo they should advertise to lol
Oh Tiffany ate his big *** up
IMG_2989.jpeg
Michele final four CONFIRMED thanks pinky sister ❤️
she is going to be your new Natalie negrotti lmao
What is your point? I enjoyed All-Stars but yes it was terribly edited just like all their products. Yes, they have a marketing and identity crisis. Even with all that it was well-received enough for 4 seasons and I saw a plethora of my favorites that I never thought in a million years I'd see again. Even with it's hundreds of flaws I am thankful for it!! We get it you work in tv and have a knowledge of advertising and ratings. Was the point of your post just to flex that?
Did Mother win?
Youll turn around on her one day. I did
that's not a meltdown. a meltdown is what kvm had during all stars 3
I'm not bad about Tori/Kam. They about even and basically the same player. Pick whichever one you think is better. Kam beat Tori in an elimination that didn't matter for Tori though.
Laurel > Cara though. Cara was a sidekick for too long IMO. I also think Emily Schromm is easily top 8.
Tyler losing us great though Josh would have been a better update.
For the Kam/Tori debate, I got to give it to Kam. She's smarter than Tori and has played more creatively and with more agility (strategically). Agree they're similar strength/fitness wise.
Please tell me mother won
IMG_5591.jpeg
Dear god they got decimated. Is this the worst performance from an "alliance"?
If that alliance is real then I'm guessing Michaela eliminated Tiffany bc they threw her in as the main vote but Tiffany's name got picked and...lmao
This is the saddest alliance ever
they had no shot with this format, it was designed to get all the vets to the end
this isn't survivor they could have won an elimination. Paulie literally asked to go against John.
Also Amanda and Jonna are literally vets
that alliance performed pathetically my goodness
I'm getting nervous about my girl(s)
also no matter what the format is ppl are gonna scream that it's "set up for the vets" to get to the end lol.
that's true they could've won elims, but with the format the odds of them ever pulling off a "comeback" were insurmountable. When 90% of the house is constantly throwing their name in, what do you think is the most likely scenario? you're a smart guy let's be real.
this format with the lottery would've saved the global season with the teams so divided
jonna is an "all star" that'd be like calling MJ or Yes a "vet" when they are in no ways part of that big alliance.
and here comes stupid walking in with no idea how numbers work
Tell me the format these guys had a chance at ? Lmao nah they could of went in played nice and got some numbers socially. Being loud and annoying isn't a good strategy also Michaels personaluty does not fit this group lol
Pages