Survivor: Generic Thread (No Spoilers)

If I've seen the newer seasons after HvsV and wanna see more seasons which ones should I watch?

[QUOTE=Challenge20;426351]If I've seen the newer seasons after HvsV and wanna see more seasons which ones should I watch?[/QUOTE] I suggest starting from the beginning. Season 1's a good place to start.

Alright, which ones are the best tho? Cause I don't wanna watch stupid predictable seasons like BvW was after the merge.

[QUOTE=Challenge20;426427]Alright, which ones are the best tho? Cause I don't wanna watch stupid predictable seasons like BvW was after the merge.[/QUOTE] Cook Islands, Micronesia.

What location do you guys think they should go. I think going to Congo would be great.

[QUOTE=Challenge 17;426487]What location do you guys think they should go. I think going to Congo would be great.[/QUOTE] Anywhere in Africa, Peru, Patagonia would be awesome as well. I definitely wish they'd go inland again, we've had too many coastal locations over last couple of years.

RIP Caleb

[QUOTE=Challenge 17;426487]What location do you guys think they should go. I think going to Congo would be great.[/QUOTE] Vietnam would be sick. I've always wanted them to do a cold season, but that's never going to happen.

[QUOTE=gamer73;426484]Cook Islands, Micronesia.[/QUOTE] Cook Islands doesn't get the love it should. I thought it was an awesome season. Parvati, Yul, Ozzy, Candice, Penner, and Billy Garcia! Who wouldn't love that season?

I was looking through old threads and did people really try to say Russell was one of rhe best players, let alone deserved to win either of his seasons?

[QUOTE=Fresh Meat;435824]I was looking through old threads and did people really try to say Russell was one of rhe best players, let alone deserved to win either of his seasons?[/QUOTE] He did deserve to win, Natalie I think that was her name did absolutely nothing all game. Sandra shouldn't have won heros vs villains either. The best player ever I'd say would be Kim because nobody had a thought of voting for her plus she won a lot of challenges.

[QUOTE=Challenge 17;435826]He did deserve to win, Natalie I think that was her name did absolutely nothing all game. Sandra shouldn't have won heros vs villains either. The best player ever I'd say would be Kim because nobody had a thought of voting for her plus she won a lot of challenges.[/QUOTE] They both were more deserving because they had a social game which is the basis of Survivor. He even said himself he doesn't care about that aspect which means he will never win. Kim is up there, but I feel like I need to see her play once more with a cast that's playing the game.

[QUOTE=Fresh Meat;435827]They both were more deserving because they had a social game which is the basis of Survivor. He even said himself he doesn't care about that aspect which means he will never win. [B]Kim is up there, but I feel like I need to see her play once more with a cast that's playing the game.[/B][/QUOTE] I agree, One World was full of idiots that didn't want to or know how to play the game. Kim needs to play with a more aggressive crowd so I can see what she's really capable of.

[QUOTE=Fresh Meat;435827]They both were more deserving because they had a social game which is the basis of Survivor. He even said himself he doesn't care about that aspect which means he will never win. Kim is up there, but I feel like I need to see her play once more with a cast that's playing the game.[/QUOTE] Sandra doesn't deserve it IMO she never won a immunity challenge. Parviti should have won IMO. Kim was a mastermind easily the best female, maybe Parviti was better but that's because she had more shots.

[QUOTE=Challenge 17;435830]Sandra doesn't deserve it IMO she never won a immunity challenge. Parviti should have won IMO. Kim was a mastermind easily the best female, maybe Parviti was better but that's because she had more shots.[/QUOTE] Just because you win immunity challenges doesn't mean you deserve to win.

[QUOTE=CoolerTalk;428803]Cook Islands doesn't get the love it should. I thought it was an awesome season. Parvati, Yul, Ozzy, Candice, Penner, and Billy Garcia! Who wouldn't love that season?[/QUOTE] I was watching Cook Islands yesterday, and I have to say I'm really impressed with Candice. I'm not her biggest fan, but she was very strong at the challenges. This season was amazing, I loved how the Aitu tribe started on the bottom of the totem pole and finished with full control of the game. I love underdogs.

Here's my personal opinion on the matter of Kim. Sure, she won, but to be honest she's not that memorable to me, like Parvati. She really far down my list of winners I like, just because I thought she really had it easy in the game. Onto the other matter...I've always said if a winner can make it to the end a second time they deserve to win. Everyone knew ahead of time going into HvV that Sandra wasn't going to win comps and only plays strategy. I would have preferred Parv to win based on her overall gameplay compared to Sandra's, but Sandra deserved it nonetheless.

Out of the female winners, who do you guys think is Better then Kim?

[QUOTE=Challenge 17;435896]Out of the female winners, who do you guys think is Better then Kim?[/QUOTE] Parvati

[QUOTE=melm3;435898]Parvati[/QUOTE] She is the only one I'd agree with tbh. Off the fact she's won more challenges then any others girl. And she used her sexy looks to her advantage.

[QUOTE=Challenge 17;435900]She is the only one I'd agree with tbh. Off the fact she's won more challenges then any others girl. And she used her sexy looks to her advantage.[/QUOTE] She pretty much had the whole package. Brain, Beauty, and Brawn. Lol

[QUOTE=Challenge 17;435896]Out of the female winners, who do you guys think is Better then Kim?[/QUOTE] Physically no one, but Parv. However, I think Tina, Amber, and Jenna all played better social games and outsmarted their opponents more or went up against better competitors.

[QUOTE=fabulous788;435907]Physically no one, but Parv. However, I think Tina, Amber, and Jenna all played better social games and outsmarted their opponents more or went up against better competitors.[/QUOTE] Determining the strength of a competitor is nearly impossible to do. Go back and watch Parv's first season. She was not a good competitor at all. It was only on her next 2 seasons that she proved herself as a Survivor player. For all we know the same could be said for people on One World. Comparing winners from season to season is just personal preference based a lot on the editing.

I already watched Cagayan, Tocantins, Cook Islands, China and I'm currently watching Micronesia. Which seasons do you recomend me, preferably seasons with new players?

[QUOTE=nevidcm;436150]I already watched Cagayan, Tocantins, Cook Islands, China and I'm currently watching Micronesia. Which seasons do you recomend me, preferably seasons with new players?[/QUOTE] Gabon! It's great.

[QUOTE=nevidcm;436150]I already watched Cagayan, Tocantins, Cook Islands, China and I'm currently watching Micronesia. Which seasons do you recomend me, preferably seasons with new players?[/QUOTE] Definitely Gabon. I would also say Palau and Panama Exile Island. It had a good group of interesting characters.

[QUOTE=nevidcm;436150]I already watched Cagayan, Tocantins, Cook Islands, China and I'm currently watching Micronesia. Which seasons do you recomend me, preferably seasons with new players?[/QUOTE] Pearl Islands is another good one as well.

What about Vanuatu, is it a good season?

I personally enjoyed Samoa, despite hating Russell.

I really liked Vanuatu. Also, Natalie was a good winner for that season, just like every winner. She played a great social game, against a guy who amazingly played no social game.