We listen for the interviews. If he didnt have guests, I certainly couldnt be listening. I like finding out stuff beyond the edit the shows get. I am very aware that most here dont want to listen, so I come back here with the takeaways for you. Why be annoyed over what we waste our time doing?
im personally not really into any podcast things so I appreciate you relaying any tidbits, thank you
So I read an article about season 3 UK and that applications will be open soon, it made mention of 4 weeks though I swear I kept reading on here it's only 2 weeks
I don't get why yall give John the time of day and listen to his stuff.
Bananas John is charismatic which is enough for me to suffer through him if he has one of my favs on. So I'm definitely gonna listen for Queen Janelle. I listened to his podcast with Marie during SLA and I was rewarded for it because she dragged Devin, stood up for Cara, and dragged the corniness of the spy theme. They did praise Amanda, though, which was terrible.
She states she chose Parvati because the minute she wasnt picked, she assumed it was Parvati.
Yeah this is a potential flaw in the game as it seems pretty obvious that either Dan or Janelle would be a traitor and that either Parvati or Sandra would be a traitor (though to be fair neither was initially a traitor and Parvati was recruited, which players seem to keep skipping over). Having said that, it pits those players against each other in a sense, and people still have to sniff out which is a traitor.
Sandra says she likes Parvati now
When did she stop liking her? I never knew what happened as it always seemed like they got along on Heroes v Villains. I loved when it was down to them and Russell and they were bonding over trashing him lmao
This is a non-spoiler thread. There is a spoiler thread you could have posted that spoiler in. Ugh yall are so selfish trying to ruin things for those who like to enjoy it live. Just because you can't watch a show without knowing what happens doesnt mean no one else should have to know.
did we read the same thing? I didn't think that was spoilers posted, it was behind the scenes from what we already saw Up through current episode.
So this seems to confirm what Fiona and maybe other ppl said that they aren't just dumb lol and do have suspicions on traitors but aren't taking a shot at least w this US2 version. It's interesting to me cause I didn't get any indicatiors about that in any season 1 version.
This is a non-spoiler thread. There is a spoiler thread you could have posted that spoiler in. Ugh yall are so selfish trying to ruin things for those who like to enjoy it live. Just because you can't watch a show without knowing what happens doesnt mean no one else should have to know.
did we read the same thing? I didn't think that was spoilers posted, it was behind the scenes from what we already saw Up through current episode.
It's interesting to me cause I didn't get any indicatiors about that in any season 1 version.
Well I'm sure a lot of the current players watched season 1 and figured some things out. Janelle even mentioned knowing she was close to being murdered one week because she was last to arrive to breakfast, so yeah they now know these things and are discussing them but we aren't being shown it. The first season people weren't sure how many traitors there were, from what shows, etc. I think now they know there are likely 3-4 (they were figuring 4 post-recruit), that Big Brother and Survivor are likely to have provided a traitor, that the last people to breakfast were close to being murdered, etc.
Janelle was working with Dan, Parvati, Sandra, and CT but realized she was at that bottom of that group which is why she flipped and went after Dan; she was higher up in the group with Peter, Trishelle, and Bergie. Sandra figured Parvati was a traitor since she wasn't, but like with Janelle/Dan she knew Parvati wasn't doing to murder her so there has been no reason to go after her.
Not sure if this was meant for me, but I hope I didn't make you think you needed to apologize for anything. I don't think you did anything bad? I was just trying to provide some information.
I think they're going to have to change some things up for next season for sure and what's w the breakfast thing I find it so annoying can you imagine having to be so fake n happy n hug so many ppl every morning they need a different murder announcement format
Idk if this was mentioned but Sandra gave lots of props to Ct for his social game. Every breakfast, he gave every woman a kiss, which was important because it "made all the women feel special." He said good morning to everyone. Once again, CTs lowkey social game seems to be a key to his success so far in the game.
Parvati being a traitor because Sandra isn't one doesn't make sense. Parvati was recruited.
You don't think production influenced this decision?
Influenced what decision? For them to recruit Parvati? Ok, let's say they did, still doesn't make sense. The logic isn't logicing. The way it's worded makes it seem like Sandra thought Parvati was one of the initial traitors, which she wasn't. Which makes the "I knew it was Parvati because I wasn't one" null and void. She already stated she thought Janelle was the recruit.
...
That's why I picked Tyson and Jeremy Collins over him
okay I'm so curious who this is, I'm googling now lol
Hmm so the bananas of survivor?
im personally not really into any podcast things so I appreciate you relaying any tidbits, thank you
So I read an article about season 3 UK and that applications will be open soon, it made mention of 4 weeks though I swear I kept reading on here it's only 2 weeks
BananasJohn is charismatic which is enough for me to suffer through him if he has one of my favs on. So I'm definitely gonna listen for Queen Janelle. I listened to his podcast with Marie during SLA and I was rewarded for it because she dragged Devin, stood up for Cara, and dragged the corniness of the spy theme. They did praise Amanda, though, which was terrible.No he's not John level bad. Just not needed.
Yeah this is a potential flaw in the game as it seems pretty obvious that either Dan or Janelle would be a traitor and that either Parvati or Sandra would be a traitor (though to be fair neither was initially a traitor and Parvati was recruited, which players seem to keep skipping over). Having said that, it pits those players against each other in a sense, and people still have to sniff out which is a traitor.
When did she stop liking her? I never knew what happened as it always seemed like they got along on Heroes v Villains. I loved when it was down to them and Russell and they were bonding over trashing him lmao
did we read the same thing? I didn't think that was spoilers posted, it was behind the scenes from what we already saw Up through current episode.
So this seems to confirm what Fiona and maybe other ppl said that they aren't just dumb lol and do have suspicions on traitors but aren't taking a shot at least w this US2 version. It's interesting to me cause I didn't get any indicatiors about that in any season 1 version.
It said who was banished next.
Well I'm sure a lot of the current players watched season 1 and figured some things out. Janelle even mentioned knowing she was close to being murdered one week because she was last to arrive to breakfast, so yeah they now know these things and are discussing them but we aren't being shown it. The first season people weren't sure how many traitors there were, from what shows, etc. I think now they know there are likely 3-4 (they were figuring 4 post-recruit), that Big Brother and Survivor are likely to have provided a traitor, that the last people to breakfast were close to being murdered, etc.
Janelle was working with Dan, Parvati, Sandra, and CT but realized she was at that bottom of that group which is why she flipped and went after Dan; she was higher up in the group with Peter, Trishelle, and Bergie. Sandra figured Parvati was a traitor since she wasn't, but like with Janelle/Dan she knew Parvati wasn't doing to murder her so there has been no reason to go after her.
i guess I missed that part, sorry
Not sure if this was meant for me, but I hope I didn't make you think you needed to apologize for anything. I don't think you did anything bad? I was just trying to provide some information.
Ah man I wonder if the other season 2's the ppl caught on and more aware
I feel like Traitors have to be random in season 3.
No, so sorry, I was apologizing to oldschool about spoiler thing.
I think they're going to have to change some things up for next season for sure and what's w the breakfast thing I find it so annoying can you imagine having to be so fake n happy n hug so many ppl every morning they need a different murder announcement format
No worries! Luckily it was a pretty obvious spoiler and I appreciate the interview recap!
Sorry Timster to annoy you with nonsense but create a dream cast of only Rock and Flavor of Love girls.
No but he wasn't needed in 5 seasons of Survivor, he's overrated badly, and he'd flop on this show.
Parvati being a traitor because Sandra isn't one doesn't make sense. Parvati was recruited.
Idk if this was mentioned but Sandra gave lots of props to Ct for his social game. Every breakfast, he gave every woman a kiss, which was important because it "made all the women feel special." He said good morning to everyone. Once again, CTs lowkey social game seems to be a key to his success so far in the game.
You don't think production influenced this decision?
fjck you hypocrite now you spoiled it for everyone else that didn't see the original comment with your hint.
Timster! How did I spoil it?
Influenced what decision? For them to recruit Parvati? Ok, let's say they did, still doesn't make sense. The logic isn't logicing. The way it's worded makes it seem like Sandra thought Parvati was one of the initial traitors, which she wasn't. Which makes the "I knew it was Parvati because I wasn't one" null and void. She already stated she thought Janelle was the recruit.
Pages