202mitch wrote:imagine getting on survivor, making it all the way to F3, and then winning survivor and being told that you don't deserve it because your mom had cancer. wow **** me up.
You've been twisting people's words so bad. Nobody said he didn't deserve it BECAUSE his mom had cancer, nobody has been "hating" on Adam, and those are both things you've accused people of saying. People said he shouldn't win, solely, on that. And he didn't deserve to sweep the jury votes. His mother's cancer shouldn't have played a factor when the jury's decision is supposed to be based on gameplay and how they got to the end. It's a strategy to use the sympathy, but it should only be a small consideration.You've defended Adam's win to the death by putting words in people's mouths and twisting their opinions yourself. Get over it.
No. The Jury's decisions isn't supposed to be based on anything. People can vote for whatever reasons they want to.
plainly put, game/social wise or not, adam had better jury management which is why more (everyone) voted for him. its not about what you do.. its about how they percieve you
202mitch wrote:imagine getting on survivor, making it all the way to F3, and then winning survivor and being told that you don't deserve it because your mom had cancer. wow **** me up.
You've been twisting people's words so bad. Nobody said he didn't deserve it BECAUSE his mom had cancer, nobody has been "hating" on Adam, and those are both things you've accused people of saying. People said he shouldn't win, solely, on that. And he didn't deserve to sweep the jury votes. His mother's cancer shouldn't have played a factor when the jury's decision is supposed to be based on gameplay and how they got to the end. It's a strategy to use the sympathy, but it should only be a small consideration.You've defended Adam's win to the death by putting words in people's mouths and twisting their opinions yourself. Get over it.
No. The Jury's decisions isn't supposed to be based on anything. People can vote for whatever reasons they want to.
plainly put, game/social wise or not, adam had better jury management which is why more (everyone) voted for him. its not about what you do.. its about how they percieve you
No doubt. And that's part of the game. With Chris, Jay, and David's question. It was evident to me, Adam was going to get the majority.
202mitch wrote:imagine getting on survivor, making it all the way to F3, and then winning survivor and being told that you don't deserve it because your mom had cancer. wow **** me up.
You've been twisting people's words so bad. Nobody said he didn't deserve it BECAUSE his mom had cancer, nobody has been "hating" on Adam, and those are both things you've accused people of saying. People said he shouldn't win, solely, on that. And he didn't deserve to sweep the jury votes. His mother's cancer shouldn't have played a factor when the jury's decision is supposed to be based on gameplay and how they got to the end. It's a strategy to use the sympathy, but it should only be a small consideration.You've defended Adam's win to the death by putting words in people's mouths and twisting their opinions yourself. Get over it.
No. The Jury's decisions isn't supposed to be based on anything. People can vote for whatever reasons they want to.
plainly put, game/social wise or not, adam had better jury management which is why more (everyone) voted for him. its not about what you do.. its about how they percieve you
Other reality shows should take notes though. Survivor is one of the only shows to continually cast "normal" people and super fans. When you cast people that are fans and actually watch the show they **** PLAY. They make moves, they blindside and they make for good tv. While I wouldn't call this season amazing or shit atleast we had unpredictability which for me is so much better than 5+ people sticking together until the very end and everyone playing it safe.
Other reality shows should take notes though. Survivor is one of the only shows to continually cast "normal" people and super fans. When you cast people that are fans and actually watch the show the **** PLAY. They make moves, they blindside and they make for good tv. While I wouldn't call this season amazing or shit atleast we had unpredictability which for me is so much better than 5+ people sticking together until the very end and everyone playing it safe.
I have wanted to. What season would your recommend as a starting point? (I have no clue how many there are)
2 - definitely!!! it had a great cast (mix of hard core bb fans and avg joes), lots of twists, and some really good gameplaying - the final few rounds were insane
Did they do away with the fan favorite money?? I think that money would have went to Jay. He was way more compelling and a game changer than Zeke or Michaela and I'm ****** we didn't get him in this upcoming season.
Did they do away with the fan favorite money?? I think that money would have went to Jay. He was way more compelling and a game changer than Zeke or Michaela and I'm ****** we didn't get him in this upcoming season.
Idk why people like Zeke so much. He struck me as some one that was very self-aware that he was one TV and therefore, not geniune.Jay was leagues better.
michaelas game changing move: using rocks and pebbles to make plans and strategy lol idk...some players i look forward to seeing again...but most no..not at all.
I hope to see a showdown between Tony and Sandra that will be very fun to watch. but many of these people did not make game changing moves. Voting out your own mother is not game changing. Its actually cringeworthy hearing jeff talk about it constantly.
HEY GUYS DID YOU KNOW CIERA VOTED OUT HER OWN MOTHER?
I actually love the girls cast lol. The guys suck tho.
Yess, the only ones I don't care to see back are Sierra and Ciera, the others I'm so hyped about (yes even Sarah lol). Now for the guys, I only give a **** about Tony, JT... that's about it
seeing Malcolm lose again will be fun, dont be such a Debbie Downer.
I actually love the girls cast lol. The guys suck tho.
Yess, the only ones I don't care to see back are Sierra and Ciera, the others I'm so hyped about (yes even Sarah lol). Now for the guys, I only give a **** about Tony, JT... that's about it
i am probably the only one hyped for Sierra lol. I feel like she has a lot of potential.
plainly put, game/social wise or not, adam had better jury management which is why more (everyone) voted for him. its not about what you do.. its about how they percieve you
No doubt. And that's part of the game. With Chris, Jay, and David's question. It was evident to me, Adam was going to get the majority.
Other reality shows should take notes though. Survivor is one of the only shows to continually cast "normal" people and super fans. When you cast people that are fans and actually watch the show they **** PLAY. They make moves, they blindside and they make for good tv. While I wouldn't call this season amazing or shit atleast we had unpredictability which for me is so much better than 5+ people sticking together until the very end and everyone playing it safe.
you should watch Big Brother Canada
I have wanted to. What season would your recommend as a starting point? (I have no clue how many there are)
2 - definitely!!! it had a great cast (mix of hard core bb fans and avg joes), lots of twists, and some really good gameplaying - the final few rounds were insane
then i'd go 1, 3, 4
I'm not a big adam fan, but I'm low key shipping him with Jay. They are really cute together and Jay called Adam a beautiful person in an interview.
Jay is just adorable. I wish he was on 34 instead of zeke. Since voting out michela changed the game more than anything zeke did.
hope this isnt the last time we see jay playing survivor
Did they do away with the fan favorite money?? I think that money would have went to Jay. He was way more compelling and a game changer than Zeke or Michaela and I'm ****** we didn't get him in this upcoming season.
And then I saw this......
http://www.tvguide.com/news/survivor-hannah-shapiro-best-tv-performance-2016-panic-attack/
Wow.
agreed. Zeke didn't do shit. He changed nothing.
Idk why people like Zeke so much. He struck me as some one that was very self-aware that he was one TV and therefore, not geniune.
Jay was leagues better.
What was Michaela's game changing move? Being voted out by Jay?!
Pretty much. Unless its voting out Mari, the "winner" that was robbed.
I mean, Caleb is on the cast who literally never even went to a tribal council, so at least she's not the worst one from the bunch
He changed the game by being medically evacuated. :O
varner is easily the worst.
In terms of game changers, Michaela and Caleb on the bottom of the totem pole. Along with Hali.
Aw shit, He is back again? Must have overlooked his useless ***.
I'm not really looking forward to this next season. So many people I don't care to see again.
michaelas game changing move: using rocks and pebbles to make plans and strategy lol idk...some players i look forward to seeing again...but most no..not at all.
I hope to see a showdown between Tony and Sandra that will be very fun to watch. but many of these people did not make game changing moves. Voting out your own mother is not game changing. Its actually cringeworthy hearing jeff talk about it constantly.
HEY GUYS DID YOU KNOW CIERA VOTED OUT HER OWN MOTHER?
I actually love the girls cast lol. The guys suck tho.
Literally forgot he was even on this *****
Yess, the only ones I don't care to see back are Sierra and Ciera, the others I'm so hyped about (yes even Sarah lol).
Now for the guys, I only give a **** about Tony, JT... that's about it
Even if Sarah becomes a GOAT and makes it to FTC, she deserves the million. If she makes it past her first TC, she deserves the million.
seeing Malcolm lose again will be fun, dont be such a Debbie Downer.
i am probably the only one hyped for Sierra lol. I feel like she has a lot of potential.
I am hyped for Sarah. It is someone who has potential and has not been shoved down our throats 3 seasons.
Pages