Challenge 17 wrote:Adam is easily the worst winner in survivor history. Don't blame the jury for his shitty game play and arrogance
i just can't with some of you hahahha
He is. Name someone who's worse.
Bob and Natalie White
bob maybe. But Natalie isn't bad. She actually made bonds with gulu, she got rid of erik, convincing the gulu to turn on their own instead of the foa foa.
She was awful
so you think Russell openly hates everyone hantz should have won despite literally never trying once to talk to gulu(the majority of the jury) yeah right.
I'm surprised people find the result controversial. It was clear that Ken was choosing the winner and he picked Adam.
And Adam is nowhere near the worst winner ever. Natalie White (the winner no one will ever remember) is easily the worst.
Adam will fall into the murky middle in my book. Didn't really care for him and wasn't impressed by his game, but he found himself with two people he outplayed in the end.
Challenge 17 wrote:Adam is easily the worst winner in survivor history. Don't blame the jury for his shitty game play and arrogance
i just can't with some of you hahahha
He is. Name someone who's worse.
Bob and Natalie White
bob maybe. But Natalie isn't bad. She actually made bonds with gulu, she got rid of erik, convincing the gulu to turn on their own instead of the foa foa.
She was awful
so you think Russell openly hates everyone hantz should have won despite literally never trying once to talk to gulu(the majority of the jury) yeah right.
lol at this narrative you're trying to paint. Russell might have been a **** but he outplayed Natalie and what's his name. Russell carried them to the end lolz.
Challenge 17 wrote:Adam is easily the worst winner in survivor history. Don't blame the jury for his shitty game play and arrogance
i just can't with some of you hahahha
He is. Name someone who's worse.
fabio, michelle, sandra, natalie... to name a few
Sandra and Natalie actually had bonds with the majority of the jury and played solid games. Michelle did the same. Adam played sloppy and relayed on his dying mom card
so tell me, if adam had not said anything about his mom (which he almost didn't if that last juror didn't ask - at least it looked that way)... he wouldn't have won? **** that, adam was still winning that game hands ******* down. don't give me that bs
Challenge 17 wrote:Adam is easily the worst winner in survivor history. Don't blame the jury for his shitty game play and arrogance
i just can't with some of you hahahha
He is. Name someone who's worse.
fabio, michelle, sandra, natalie... to name a few
Sandra and Natalie actually had bonds with the majority of the jury and played solid games. Michelle did the same. Adam played sloppy and relayed on his dying mom card
so tell me, if adam had not said anything about his mom (which he almost didn't if that last juror didn't ask - at least it looked that way)... he wouldn't have won? **** that, adam was still winning that game hands ******* down. don't give me that bs
I don't think he beats Hannah or Ken without that tbh.
Gosh if I could have gone on a few years ago I would have been a shoo in... my mom was fighting breast cancer for the second time, but it was her fifth battle and the kicker her younger sister, my God-mother... had to have a radical mastectomy at the same time because she too was being treated for breast cancer at the same time <--- all true and **** I missed my shot!!! Adam sucked so much, Hannah didn't convey her quiet but well played game...
Challenge 17 wrote:Adam is easily the worst winner in survivor history. Don't blame the jury for his shitty game play and arrogance
i just can't with some of you hahahha
He is. Name someone who's worse.
fabio, michelle, sandra, natalie... to name a few
Sandra and Natalie actually had bonds with the majority of the jury and played solid games. Michelle did the same. Adam played sloppy and relayed on his dying mom card
so tell me, if adam had not said anything about his mom (which he almost didn't if that last juror didn't ask - at least it looked that way)... he wouldn't have won? **** that, adam was still winning that game hands ******* down. don't give me that bs
I don't think he beats Hannah or Ken without that tbh.
lool david or adam was winning that season... the others may have gotten some votes, but in the jury's eyes they clearly saw adam do more than the other two... the other two were verrrrry UTR and it's hard to reward someone when you can only take their word for it (rather than see it with your own eyes)
Challenge 17 wrote:Adam is easily the worst winner in survivor history. Don't blame the jury for his shitty game play and arrogance
i just can't with some of you hahahha
He is. Name someone who's worse.
Bob and Natalie White
bob maybe. But Natalie isn't bad. She actually made bonds with gulu, she got rid of erik, convincing the gulu to turn on their own instead of the foa foa.
She was awful
so you think Russell openly hates everyone hantz should have won despite literally never trying once to talk to gulu(the majority of the jury) yeah right.
lol at this narrative you're trying to paint. Russell might have been a **** but he outplayed Natalie and what's his name. Russell carried them to the end lolz.
did he tho? Russell took her thinking she was an easy win. She said in the very beginning she knew she could win if she worked with him. She played him, got to sit back and make moves letting him take all the heat. She literally changed the game by getting rid of erik. She played him and everyone into thinking she wasn't a threat then she won.
Challenge 17 wrote:Adam is easily the worst winner in survivor history. Don't blame the jury for his shitty game play and arrogance
i just can't with some of you hahahha
He is. Name someone who's worse.
fabio, michelle, sandra, natalie... to name a few
Sandra and Natalie actually had bonds with the majority of the jury and played solid games. Michelle did the same. Adam played sloppy and relayed on his dying mom card
so tell me, if adam had not said anything about his mom (which he almost didn't if that last juror didn't ask - at least it looked that way)... he wouldn't have won? **** that, adam was still winning that game hands ******* down. don't give me that bs
I don't think he beats Hannah or Ken without that tbh.
the others may have gotten some votes, but in the jury's eyes they clearly saw adam do more than the other two...
Challenge 17 wrote:Adam is easily the worst winner in survivor history. Don't blame the jury for his shitty game play and arrogance
i just can't with some of you hahahha
He is. Name someone who's worse.
fabio, michelle, sandra, natalie... to name a few
Sandra and Natalie actually had bonds with the majority of the jury and played solid games. Michelle did the same. Adam played sloppy and relayed on his dying mom card
so tell me, if adam had not said anything about his mom (which he almost didn't if that last juror didn't ask - at least it looked that way)... he wouldn't have won? **** that, adam was still winning that game hands ******* down. don't give me that bs
Ken maybe, but i think Hannah wins if he says nothing. Don't be ignorant and think that him getting every vote has nothing to do with sympathy.
Challenge 17 wrote:Adam is easily the worst winner in survivor history. Don't blame the jury for his shitty game play and arrogance
i just can't with some of you hahahha
He is. Name someone who's worse.
fabio, michelle, sandra, natalie... to name a few
Sandra and Natalie actually had bonds with the majority of the jury and played solid games. Michelle did the same. Adam played sloppy and relayed on his dying mom card
so tell me, if adam had not said anything about his mom (which he almost didn't if that last juror didn't ask - at least it looked that way)... he wouldn't have won? **** that, adam was still winning that game hands ******* down. don't give me that bs
I don't think he beats Hannah or Ken without that tbh.
the others may have gotten some votes, but in the jury's eyes they clearly saw adam do more than the other two...
Explain
the jury only sees what happens at tribal and hear what happened from the latest eliminated... how many times did they witness hannah and ken do something at tribal? how many times do you think their names were brought up in ponderosa over the likes of adam, david, and jay?
Challenge 17 wrote:Adam is easily the worst winner in survivor history. Don't blame the jury for his shitty game play and arrogance
i just can't with some of you hahahha
He is. Name someone who's worse.
fabio, michelle, sandra, natalie... to name a few
Sandra and Natalie actually had bonds with the majority of the jury and played solid games. Michelle did the same. Adam played sloppy and relayed on his dying mom card
so tell me, if adam had not said anything about his mom (which he almost didn't if that last juror didn't ask - at least it looked that way)... he wouldn't have won? **** that, adam was still winning that game hands ******* down. don't give me that bs
Ken maybe, but i think Hannah wins if he says nothing. Don't be ignorant and think that him getting every vote has nothing to do with sympathy.
i'm not being ignorant.. i know the sympathy card played extremely well to his advantage. but it also solidified what was already pretty much going to be his win anyways...much like jeremy did when he played the baby card and spencer got arrogant.
dying at someone actually thinking natalie is a good winner... but actually hahahhaha
Natalie is a deserving winner because mick and Russell are undeserving. If you think Russell had a shot at winning either season than you are a idiot.
if you want to complain about the jury voting with emotions over gameplay then get a reality check because had they not played with emotions, russell would have won. (that is not for HvV... parvati would have won that)
Challenge 17 wrote:Adam is easily the worst winner in survivor history. Don't blame the jury for his shitty game play and arrogance
i just can't with some of you hahahha
He is. Name someone who's worse.
fabio, michelle, sandra, natalie... to name a few
Sandra and Natalie actually had bonds with the majority of the jury and played solid games. Michelle did the same. Adam played sloppy and relayed on his dying mom card
so tell me, if adam had not said anything about his mom (which he almost didn't if that last juror didn't ask - at least it looked that way)... he wouldn't have won? **** that, adam was still winning that game hands ******* down. don't give me that bs
I don't think he beats Hannah or Ken without that tbh.
the others may have gotten some votes, but in the jury's eyes they clearly saw adam do more than the other two...
Explain
the jury only sees what happens at tribal and hear what happened from the lasted eliminated... how many times did they witness hannah and ken do something at tribal? how many times do you think their names were brought up in ponderosa over the likes of adam, david, and jay?
Um the jury knew what moves Hannah was responsible for. Michelle even asked Hannah if she was ever on the opposite end of a vote lol. The jury saw Adam get played by Sunday. The jury saw Adam waste 2 idols. What did the jury see that Adam actually did that was positive?
202mitch wrote:dying at someone actually thinking natalie is a good winner... but actually hahahhaha
Natalie is a deserving winner because mick and Russell are undeserving. If you think Russell had a shot at winning either season than you are a idiot.
if you want to complain about the jury voting with emotions over gameplay then get a reality check because had they not played with emotions, russell would have won.
202mitch wrote:dying at someone actually thinking natalie is a good winner... but actually hahahhaha
Natalie is a deserving winner because mick and Russell are undeserving. If you think Russell had a shot at winning either season than you are a idiot.
if you want to complain about the jury voting with emotions over gameplay then get a reality check because had they not played with emotions, russell would have won.
there's a huge difference in losing because everyone hates you and losing because sympathy. If Russell was so great he would have played a social game. You think he should have won when he ignored half the jury? Yeah that makes sense. The social game and emotional voting aren't the same. If Russell was so great then his ******* would have noticed hey my plan to literally only ever talk to my alliance didn't work last time, maybe i should switch it up
Also Hannah owned Adam at that FTC lol. Basically what Adam said during FTC is "Hannah went rogue and I had to listen to her"
i think more people saw adam as a threat though... definitely more of a threat then hannah ever was. and because of this, the fact that adam escaped so many tribals without anyone getting him is what made people want to vote. All hannah has is, yes i was in the majority (a common floater pitch to win (not saying shes a floater)) and she took out brett which even after she said why, still made no sense... so no, she didn't "own" anything in that tribal. she stumbled through most of her answers too, and didn't even SPEAK UP when a move she did (swayed ken) was awarded to someone else. Yeah she really owned that
Also Hannah owned Adam at that FTC lol. Basically what Adam said during FTC is "Hannah went rogue and I had to listen to her"
i think more people saw adam as a threat though... definitely more of a threat then hannah ever was. and because of this, the fact that adam escaped so many tribals without anyone getting him is what made people want to vote. All hannah has is, yes i was in the majority (a common floater pitch to win (not saying shes a floater)) and she took out brett which even after she said why, still made no sense... so no, she didn't "own" anything in that tribal. she stumbled through most of her answers too, and didn't even SPEAK UP when a move she did (swayed ken) was awarded to someone else. Yeah she really owned that
Adam was able to escape so many tribals because people like Jay, Zeke, and David were bigger threats. Hannah was also able to escape so many tribals because of those 3. Her taking out Brett made complete sense(I don't get how you don't understand her logic behind this).
KennyER wrote:Also Hannah owned Adam at that FTC lol. Basically what Adam said during FTC is "Hannah went rogue and I had to listen to her"
i think more people saw adam as a threat though... definitely more of a threat then hannah ever was. and because of this, the fact that adam escaped so many tribals without anyone getting him is what made people want to vote. All hannah has is, yes i was in the majority (a common floater pitch to win (not saying shes a floater)) and she took out brett which even after she said why, still made no sense... so no, she didn't "own" anything in that tribal. she stumbled through most of her answers too, and didn't even SPEAK UP when a move she did (swayed ken) was awarded to someone else. Yeah she really owned that
Adam was able to escape so many tribals because people like Jay, Zeke, and David were bigger threats. Hannah was also able to escape so many tribals because of those 3. Her taking out Brett made complete sense(I don't get how you don't understand her logic behind this).You still didn't answer my question tho ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
lol they saw him try a lot more than the other two. trying counts for something ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ finding two idols and using one to try an save an ally, another for his own protection, giving up a reward steal for brownie points, forming a bond with an enemy to get make sure if jay was eliminated he'd put in a good word for taylor and michele, and even if unintentional, being on the wrong side of most votes is REALLY good for your game because then the person eliminated likes and trusts you.
KennyER wrote:Also Hannah owned Adam at that FTC lol. Basically what Adam said during FTC is "Hannah went rogue and I had to listen to her"
i think more people saw adam as a threat though... definitely more of a threat then hannah ever was. and because of this, the fact that adam escaped so many tribals without anyone getting him is what made people want to vote. All hannah has is, yes i was in the majority (a common floater pitch to win (not saying shes a floater)) and she took out brett which even after she said why, still made no sense... so no, she didn't "own" anything in that tribal. she stumbled through most of her answers too, and didn't even SPEAK UP when a move she did (swayed ken) was awarded to someone else. Yeah she really owned that
Adam was able to escape so many tribals because people like Jay, Zeke, and David were bigger threats. Hannah was also able to escape so many tribals because of those 3. Her taking out Brett made complete sense(I don't get how you don't understand her logic behind this).You still didn't answer my question tho ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
giving up a reward steal for brownieforming a bond with an enemy to get make sure if jay was eliminated he'd put in a good word for taylor and michele, and even if unintentional, being on the wrong side of most votes is REALLY good for your game because then the person eliminated likes and trusts you.
It all leads back to his mother having cancer lolz
so you think Russell openly hates everyone hantz should have won despite literally never trying once to talk to gulu(the majority of the jury) yeah right.
I'm surprised people find the result controversial. It was clear that Ken was choosing the winner and he picked Adam.
And Adam is nowhere near the worst winner ever. Natalie White (the winner no one will ever remember) is easily the worst.
Adam will fall into the murky middle in my book. Didn't really care for him and wasn't impressed by his game, but he found himself with two people he outplayed in the end.
Natalie isn't bad lol. There was no way Russell would have won due to the worst social game of all time.
lol at this narrative you're trying to paint. Russell might have been a **** but he outplayed Natalie and what's his name. Russell carried them to the end lolz.
so tell me, if adam had not said anything about his mom (which he almost didn't if that last juror didn't ask - at least it looked that way)... he wouldn't have won? **** that, adam was still winning that game hands ******* down. don't give me that bs
I don't think he beats Hannah or Ken without that tbh.
Especially since Ken has a daughter
Gosh if I could have gone on a few years ago I would have been a shoo in... my mom was fighting breast cancer for the second time, but it was her fifth battle and the kicker her younger sister, my God-mother... had to have a radical mastectomy at the same time because she too was being treated for breast cancer at the same time <--- all true and **** I missed my shot!!! Adam sucked so much, Hannah didn't convey her quiet but well played game...
Hanna - yes girl Ozzy's back...sigh
lool david or adam was winning that season... the others may have gotten some votes, but in the jury's eyes they clearly saw adam do more than the other two... the other two were verrrrry UTR and it's hard to reward someone when you can only take their word for it (rather than see it with your own eyes)
did he tho? Russell took her thinking she was an easy win. She said in the very beginning she knew she could win if she worked with him. She played him, got to sit back and make moves letting him take all the heat. She literally changed the game by getting rid of erik. She played him and everyone into thinking she wasn't a threat then she won.
Russell got played twice, he thought Natalie and Sandra were goats but he ended up being the goat.
Explain
dying at someone actually thinking natalie is a good winner... but actually hahahhaha
Ken maybe, but i think Hannah wins if he says nothing. Don't be ignorant and think that him getting every vote has nothing to do with sympathy.
the jury only sees what happens at tribal and hear what happened from the latest eliminated... how many times did they witness hannah and ken do something at tribal? how many times do you think their names were brought up in ponderosa over the likes of adam, david, and jay?
i'm not being ignorant.. i know the sympathy card played extremely well to his advantage. but it also solidified what was already pretty much going to be his win anyways...much like jeremy did when he played the baby card and spencer got arrogant.
Natalie is a deserving winner because mick and Russell are undeserving. If you think Russell had a shot at winning either season than you are a idiot.
if you want to complain about the jury voting with emotions over gameplay then get a reality check because had they not played with emotions, russell would have won. (that is not for HvV... parvati would have won that)
Um the jury knew what moves Hannah was responsible for. Michelle even asked Hannah if she was ever on the opposite end of a vote lol. The jury saw Adam get played by Sunday. The jury saw Adam waste 2 idols. What did the jury see that Adam actually did that was positive?
Also Hannah owned Adam at that FTC lol. Basically what Adam said during FTC is "Hannah went rogue and I had to listen to her"
there's a huge difference in losing because everyone hates you and losing because sympathy. If Russell was so great he would have played a social game. You think he should have won when he ignored half the jury? Yeah that makes sense. The social game and emotional voting aren't the same. If Russell was so great then his ******* would have noticed hey my plan to literally only ever talk to my alliance didn't work last time, maybe i should switch it up
I can't believe noncausals actually think Russell was a good player lol. What's next Boston Rob is the greatest player of all time?
I never said Russell was a good player ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
i think more people saw adam as a threat though... definitely more of a threat then hannah ever was. and because of this, the fact that adam escaped so many tribals without anyone getting him is what made people want to vote. All hannah has is, yes i was in the majority (a common floater pitch to win (not saying shes a floater)) and she took out brett which even after she said why, still made no sense... so no, she didn't "own" anything in that tribal. she stumbled through most of her answers too, and didn't even SPEAK UP when a move she did (swayed ken) was awarded to someone else. Yeah she really owned that
Adam was able to escape so many tribals because people like Jay, Zeke, and David were bigger threats. Hannah was also able to escape so many tribals because of those 3. Her taking out Brett made complete sense(I don't get how you don't understand her logic behind this).
You still didn't answer my question tho ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
lol they saw him try a lot more than the other two. trying counts for something ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ finding two idols and using one to try an save an ally, another for his own protection, giving up a reward steal for brownie points, forming a bond with an enemy to get make sure if jay was eliminated he'd put in a good word for taylor and michele, and even if unintentional, being on the wrong side of most votes is REALLY good for your game because then the person eliminated likes and trusts you.
It all leads back to his mother having cancer lolz
Oh so he gets close with Jay then screws Jay over multiple times ****
Great work Adam. The guy even helped Ken win immunity over Jay and somehow Jay is going to forgive all of that and sway Tay/Michelle? I don't think so
Pages