As much as I didn't Adam as a character on the show, (I only liked his dynamic with Jay), he truly needed it the most.
this has nothing to do with needing, we might as well have this show be a one episode season and tell us their story and hand out the cash if that's the case.
This has everything to do with whatever the jury wants to focus on. If they go for who needs it most, it's part of the game. If they go for who they like the most, that's valid. If they go for strategic reasons, that's valid as well.
I don't see what's so hard to fathom that there isn't a set reason to vote for. Sure flashy game makes for better tv, but the jury might not give a rats *** about it.
richjoe92 wrote:As much as I didn't Adam as a character on the show, (I only liked his dynamic with Jay), he truly needed it the most.
this has nothing to do with needing, we might as well have this show be a one episode season and tell us their story and hand out the cash if that's the case.
This has everything to do with whatever the jury wants to focus on. If they go for who needs it most, it's part of the game. If they go for who they like the most, that's valid. If they go for strategic reasons, that's valid as well. I don't see what's so hard to fathom that there isn't a set reason to vote for. Sure flashy game makes for better tv, but the jury might not give a rats *** about it.
its who played the most game, this just shows that in real life and in this game the jury aren't always right and can't look at the evidence and they go with their emotions which is crud.
i swear ppl hate survivor every season even though the type of winner changes all the time... adam was WAY more deserving than Michelle was last season, yet none of you will admit to that. **** this lol
richjoe92 wrote:As much as I didn't Adam as a character on the show, (I only liked his dynamic with Jay), he truly needed it the most.
this has nothing to do with needing, we might as well have this show be a one episode season and tell us their story and hand out the cash if that's the case.
This has everything to do with whatever the jury wants to focus on. If they go for who needs it most, it's part of the game. If they go for who they like the most, that's valid. If they go for strategic reasons, that's valid as well. I don't see what's so hard to fathom that there isn't a set reason to vote for. Sure flashy game makes for better tv, but the jury might not give a rats *** about it.
its who played the most game, this just shows that in real life and in this game the jury aren't always right and can't look at the evidence and they go with their emotions which is crud.
Youu're not getting it. That's not wrong. And it's not about who played the most game.It's about who can win the Jury over. So you can do whatever you have to do to convice them you're the one.
i swear ppl hate survivor every season even though the type of winner changes all the time... adam was WAY more deserving than Michelle was last season, yet none of you will admit to that. **** this lol
richjoe92 wrote:As much as I didn't Adam as a character on the show, (I only liked his dynamic with Jay), he truly needed it the most.
this has nothing to do with needing, we might as well have this show be a one episode season and tell us their story and hand out the cash if that's the case.
This has everything to do with whatever the jury wants to focus on. If they go for who needs it most, it's part of the game. If they go for who they like the most, that's valid. If they go for strategic reasons, that's valid as well. I don't see what's so hard to fathom that there isn't a set reason to vote for. Sure flashy game makes for better tv, but the jury might not give a rats *** about it.
its who played the most game, this just shows that in real life and in this game the jury aren't always right and can't look at the evidence and they go with their emotions which is crud.
Youu're not getting it. That's not wrong. And it's not about who played the most game.It's about who can win the Jury over. So you can do whatever you have to do to convice them you're the one.
Don't go on Survivor if you won't reward game play.
richjoe92 wrote:As much as I didn't Adam as a character on the show, (I only liked his dynamic with Jay), he truly needed it the most.
this has nothing to do with needing, we might as well have this show be a one episode season and tell us their story and hand out the cash if that's the case.
This has everything to do with whatever the jury wants to focus on. If they go for who needs it most, it's part of the game. If they go for who they like the most, that's valid. If they go for strategic reasons, that's valid as well. I don't see what's so hard to fathom that there isn't a set reason to vote for. Sure flashy game makes for better tv, but the jury might not give a rats *** about it.
its who played the most game, this just shows that in real life and in this game the jury aren't always right and can't look at the evidence and they go with their emotions which is crud.
Youu're not getting it. That's not wrong. And it's not about who played the most game.It's about who can win the Jury over. So you can do whatever you have to do to convice them you're the one.
richjoe92 wrote:As much as I didn't Adam as a character on the show, (I only liked his dynamic with Jay), he truly needed it the most.
this has nothing to do with needing, we might as well have this show be a one episode season and tell us their story and hand out the cash if that's the case.
This has everything to do with whatever the jury wants to focus on. If they go for who needs it most, it's part of the game. If they go for who they like the most, that's valid. If they go for strategic reasons, that's valid as well. I don't see what's so hard to fathom that there isn't a set reason to vote for. Sure flashy game makes for better tv, but the jury might not give a rats *** about it.
its who played the most game, this just shows that in real life and in this game the jury aren't always right and can't look at the evidence and they go with their emotions which is crud.
Youu're not getting it. That's not wrong. And it's not about who played the most game.It's about who can win the Jury over. So you can do whatever you have to do to convice them you're the one.
Don't go on Survivor if you won't reward game play.
richjoe92 wrote:As much as I didn't Adam as a character on the show, (I only liked his dynamic with Jay), he truly needed it the most.
this has nothing to do with needing, we might as well have this show be a one episode season and tell us their story and hand out the cash if that's the case.
This has everything to do with whatever the jury wants to focus on. If they go for who needs it most, it's part of the game. If they go for who they like the most, that's valid. If they go for strategic reasons, that's valid as well. I don't see what's so hard to fathom that there isn't a set reason to vote for. Sure flashy game makes for better tv, but the jury might not give a rats *** about it.
its who played the most game, this just shows that in real life and in this game the jury aren't always right and can't look at the evidence and they go with their emotions which is crud.
Youu're not getting it. That's not wrong. And it's not about who played the most game.It's about who can win the Jury over. So you can do whatever you have to do to convice them you're the one.
win the jury vote with ur game not ur personal life. I don't think you get it, if Adam were to win by getting those idiots to believe he got Ken to switch instead of Hannah or even Ken himself (so he claims) then go ahead. But let's be real, that wasn't the case. Had nothing to do with the game therefore watching this season was highkey and beyond pointless with a ending like this.
hannamez8 wrote:I just wanna know is there gonna a be a teaser for queen M and King Ozzy's season or should I save face (like I should of with this season) ??
whos Queen M? And yea I think so
This has everything to do with whatever the jury wants to focus on. If they go for who needs it most, it's part of the game. If they go for who they like the most, that's valid. If they go for strategic reasons, that's valid as well.
I don't see what's so hard to fathom that there isn't a set reason to vote for. Sure flashy game makes for better tv, but the jury might not give a rats *** about it.
pls don't ever sign up for survrior boo
How in God's **** was Hannah not cast on Mamanuca Islands over Hali/Sierra?
KEN GOT ROBBEDDD TRUE WINNER OF THE SURVIVOR111
its who played the most game, this just shows that in real life and in this game the jury aren't always right and can't look at the evidence and they go with their emotions which is crud.
this is joke btw
adam is the trashiest winner ever
i swear ppl hate survivor every season even though the type of winner changes all the time... adam was WAY more deserving than Michelle was last season, yet none of you will admit to that. **** this lol
So annoyed with the Adam show right now. I'm sorry about his mom, I've lost mine as well, but my God can we talk about the game.
:/ you should like that I'm not completely heartless
Youu're not getting it. That's not wrong. And it's not about who played the most game.It's about who can win the Jury over. So you can do whatever you have to do to convice them you're the one.
mikayla
Anyone that votes for a winner based on need or what's going on at home is an awful juror.
Don't go on Survivor if you won't reward game play.
THIS EXACTLY.
yall are so ******* blind.
Michelle was infinitely better at the game than Adam was
I'll do whatever the **** I want to do bro.
Lol y'all can't dictate how people should vote
win the jury vote with ur game not ur personal life. I don't think you get it, if Adam were to win by getting those idiots to believe he got Ken to switch instead of Hannah or even Ken himself (so he claims) then go ahead. But let's be real, that wasn't the case. Had nothing to do with the game therefore watching this season was highkey and beyond pointless with a ending like this.
I adore David lol
No one is dictating how people voted--we're criticizing people voting with emotion instead of gameplay which we absolutely have the right to do
Adam's gameplay was awful--absolutely awful
loool when people still don't understand how juries work in survivor
THE WINNER OF THE SURVIVOR MILLENIALS VS GEN X- ADAMS MOM CANCER!
Yessir. Adam was socially inept. Michele's entire game was her social skills.
oh ❤️
Pages