Adam made the moves in the latter episodes to recover from some of his bonehead moves. I wish that the Immunity wins were rewarded more. I was ******* the vote to be 6-2-1 for Adam to win with Ken getting 2. I don't think it should have been 9-0-0. I would love to see Ken play again. He'd probably be either 2nd out or taken as a goat to the end but he will be one of my top 10 favorites.
Anyone that votes for a winner based on need or what's going on at home is an awful juror.
loool when people still don't understand how juries work in survivor
I'm starting to think you're an idiot. We understand it. We're just saying that it's idiotic. I pray to God they stop casting people that don't care about gameplay. If you like a horrible player winning that's great.
Adam made the moves in the latter episodes to recover from some of his bonehead moves. I wish that the Immunity wins were rewarded more. I was ******* the vote to be 6-2-1 for Adam to win with Ken getting 2. I don't think it should have been 9-0-0. I would love to see Ken play again. He'd probably be either 2nd out or taken as a goat to the end but he will be one of my top 10 favorites.
No, he didn't. Hannah made the moves. Adam didn't make any valid moves.
kvm1977 wrote:Anyone that votes for a winner based on need or what's going on at home is an awful juror.
loool when people still don't understand how juries work in survivor
I'm starting to think you're an idiot. We understand it. We're just saying that it's idiotic. I pray to God they stop casting people that don't care about gameplay. If you like a horrible player winning that's great.
ur just starting? ****. Just playing, I stop bothering replying to some people here cause their post just makes no absolute sense.
richjoe92 wrote:As much as I didn't Adam as a character on the show, (I only liked his dynamic with Jay), he truly needed it the most.
this has nothing to do with needing, we might as well have this show be a one episode season and tell us their story and hand out the cash if that's the case.
This has everything to do with whatever the jury wants to focus on. If they go for who needs it most, it's part of the game. If they go for who they like the most, that's valid. If they go for strategic reasons, that's valid as well. I don't see what's so hard to fathom that there isn't a set reason to vote for. Sure flashy game makes for better tv, but the jury might not give a rats *** about it.
its who played the most game, this just shows that in real life and in this game the jury aren't always right and can't look at the evidence and they go with their emotions which is crud.
Youu're not getting it. That's not wrong. And it's not about who played the most game.It's about who can win the Jury over. So you can do whatever you have to do to convice them you're the one.
win the jury vote with ur game not ur personal life. I don't think you get it, if Adam were to win by getting those idiots to believe he got Ken to switch instead of Hannah or even Ken himself (so he claims) then go ahead. But let's be real, that wasn't the case. Had nothing to do with the game therefore watching this season was highkey and beyond pointless with a ending like this.
And that's your personal plight. But obviously, Adam playing this game for his mom and making it to the end for his mom was simultaneously personal and game play. They beauty of survivor is that these players grow. Even sunday and someone else asked questions about personal growth or personality.
This ending doesn't take away from the season. As much as I wanted Ken to win, Adam's struggle was something far more of importance to me. My logic is, you did something right to get to the end. Now you gotta show the jury, why youre choices were the best choices as well as why you feel you deserve to win.
Others like you would vote for strategic purposes, and that is perfectly fine as well. Neither of us are wrong. We just focus or emphasize on different aspects.
If the jury voted on gameplay, or even if they voted on personal relationships like many do, the votes would've never fallen as unanimous. Never. Not sure if it means the jury is fully of whole hearted people, or if it means they aren't real players, but it's a fact.
No one is dictating how people voted--we're criticizing people voting with emotion instead of gameplay which we absolutely have the right to doAdam's gameplay was awful--absolutely awful
OMG IT HAPPENS EVERY ******* SEASON. Emotion almost always rules over gameplay because it's a personal ******* game when you are stranded out on an island cut off from everyone. Its so ******* easy for someone to sit at home and judge, but really you don't have a ******* clue how it works. Michelle winning last season was definitely emotional because ppl hated that aubry backstabbed so many people.... jesus christ. it's been 33 seasons. you can't predict a jury. smfh
kvm1977 wrote:Anyone that votes for a winner based on need or what's going on at home is an awful juror.
loool when people still don't understand how juries work in survivor
I'm starting to think you're an idiot. We understand it. We're just saying that it's idiotic. I pray to God they stop casting people that don't care about gameplay. If you like a horrible player winning that's great.
ur just starting? ****. Just playing, I stop bothering replying to some people here cause their post just makes no absolute sense.
I've never had a real issue with mitch before but I now honestly think he's clueless
No one is dictating how people voted--we're criticizing people voting with emotion instead of gameplay which we absolutely have the right to doAdam's gameplay was awful--absolutely awful
OMG IT HAPPENS EVERY ******* SEASON. Emotion almost always rules over gameplay because it's a personal ******* game when you are stranded out on an island cut off from everyone. Its so ******* easy for someone to sit at home and judge, but really you don't have a ******* clue how it works. Michelle winning last season was definitely emotional because ppl hated that aubry backstabbed so many people.... jesus christ. it's been 33 seasons. you can't predict a jury. smfh
i still think hannah sucks i dont see me saying shes better than adam (they are equally terrible players)
None of the best players reached the end and while I didn't agree with Hannah's order it worked out perfectly in the end and she, not Adam, dictated it
Adam won because of his mom...hope he enjoys the money.
Saturday should of won TBH
Y'all can't make cancer patient jokes tf
*****
i wasted idk like 3 months watching this
Adam made the moves in the latter episodes to recover from some of his bonehead moves. I wish that the Immunity wins were rewarded more. I was ******* the vote to be 6-2-1 for Adam to win with Ken getting 2. I don't think it should have been 9-0-0. I would love to see Ken play again. He'd probably be either 2nd out or taken as a goat to the end but he will be one of my top 10 favorites.
I'm starting to think you're an idiot. We understand it. We're just saying that it's idiotic. I pray to God they stop casting people that don't care about gameplay. If you like a horrible player winning that's great.
shouldve known to change the channel when adam first revealed it to us
I loved this season regardless of who the winner is
"The reason I didn't win immunity was because I had to make sure David didn't win" in a comp where there was no impact but the wind.
i love how casuals are dragging adam
on the other hand they are all about ken winning so...
No, he didn't. Hannah made the moves. Adam didn't make any valid moves.
Adam is right there alongside Mike Holloway in the worst winners category.
King Jay, Queen Michaela, King Zeke, Queen Michelle, King David, and Queen Hannah ❤️
What casuals? Who wanted Ken to win. Hannah outplayed Adam--end of stoy. It isn't even debatable
ur just starting? ****. Just playing, I stop bothering replying to some people here cause their post just makes no absolute sense.
And that's your personal plight. But obviously, Adam playing this game for his mom and making it to the end for his mom was simultaneously personal and game play. They beauty of survivor is that these players grow. Even sunday and someone else asked questions about personal growth or personality.
This ending doesn't take away from the season. As much as I wanted Ken to win, Adam's struggle was something far more of importance to me. My logic is, you did something right to get to the end. Now you gotta show the jury, why youre choices were the best choices as well as why you feel you deserve to win.
Others like you would vote for strategic purposes, and that is perfectly fine as well. Neither of us are wrong. We just focus or emphasize on different aspects.
She didn't flaunt it though. Yes, keep the target off yourself but don't wait til the very end to take credit.
Wasn't it like just an hour ago y'all were shitting on Hannah? Jfc
Patiently waiting to see Ozzy aka the highlight of this season.
i mean fb fanpage full of ladies +40 lol
She did. Name one move Adam made that wasn't dictated by someone else
Name a winner that was on the wrong side of as many votes as he was
He even took out Jay...one of the few people that definitely would have taken him to the end and someone he could have used to take out David
Adam's gameplay was awful. Especially for a long time fan
i still think hannah sucks i dont see me saying shes better than adam (they are equally terrible players)
In the end, nobody can deny this:
If the jury voted on gameplay, or even if they voted on personal relationships like many do, the votes would've never fallen as unanimous. Never. Not sure if it means the jury is fully of whole hearted people, or if it means they aren't real players, but it's a fact.
OMG IT HAPPENS EVERY ******* SEASON. Emotion almost always rules over gameplay because it's a personal ******* game when you are stranded out on an island cut off from everyone. Its so ******* easy for someone to sit at home and judge, but really you don't have a ******* clue how it works. Michelle winning last season was definitely emotional because ppl hated that aubry backstabbed so many people.... jesus christ. it's been 33 seasons. you can't predict a jury. smfh
I've never had a real issue with mitch before but I now honestly think he's clueless
Absolutely not true.
Bob is the worst survivor winner of all time
Along with Natalie white
None of the best players reached the end and while I didn't agree with Hannah's order it worked out perfectly in the end and she, not Adam, dictated it
Adam won because of his mom...hope he enjoys the money.
omg mitch knows everything about survivor/jury/HOWITWORKS because he played some online survivor games. k bye
Pages