These guys are production savvy they know production is picking big name strategist to be traitors. Dan knew he would be suspected to he kept a low-profile. Saying names and speaking up would have changed nothing, but his moves were bad too.
Lol yall still doing these think pieces on why Dan was a bad Traitor? I get it, yall cant think beyond the edit.
he was bad, edit or not. They are reality tv vets so obviously they have some idea what production's doing but he did nothing to make himself not suspicious lol
These guys are production savvy they know production is picking big name strategist to be traitors. Dan knew he would be suspected to he kept a low-profile. Saying names and speaking up would have changed nothing, but his moves were bad too.
you know who else production might have picked? bananas.
real smart of dan to take out the only other big male name besides him and CT. Genius!
Lol yall still doing these think pieces on why Dan was a bad Traitor? I get it, yall cant think beyond the edit.
The edit made his game look less bad than it actually was because everyone was onto him, even the housewives who weren't savvy about any of the gamers reputation, Parv is the only one who got royaly screwed by production when they left her with MJ and Ekin Su in that funeral challenge, everyone thought that a traitor was among those remaining 3 because they knew the production would do such thing for ssome reason, when it was Ekin Su that got murdered they narrowed it down to Parv and MJ, and of course production won't pick someone like MJ to be a traitor, so they all thought it was Parv
Lol yall still doing these think pieces on why Dan was a bad Traitor? I get it, yall cant think beyond the edit.
It's always production's fault when you favorites play poorly. Pretending Dan played anything other than poorly is denial. Just like those claiming it hurts his legacy are wrong as well.
Can yall read? I said Dan and Parv made terrible decisions over and over, but I can also acknowledge there was nothing they could have done right. Sandra knew her or Parv would be one. I think it was also Sandra who said she heard Alan tap Dan. They were already on to Parv and then Larsa said she heard Alan touch her. This isn't Survivor or BB once the suspicion is there, you can't just flip the numbers cause the vote is basically just a test of your suspicisions. They have their suspicions and then are savvy enough to watch who production follows, films, etc. Dan and Parv knew they were caught from the beginning, so they basically were just clinging on to dear life. Clearly yall arent intelligent enough to understand though.
Can yall read? I said Dan and Parv made terrible decisions over and over, but I can also acknowledge there was nothing they could have done right. Sandra knew her or Parv would be one. I think it was also Sandra who said she heard Alan tap Dan. They were already on to Parv and then Larsa said she heard Alan touch her. This isn't Survivor or BB once the suspicion is there, you can't just flip the numbers cause the vote is basically just a test of your suspicisions. They have their suspicions and then are savvy enough to watch who production follows, films, etc. Dan and Parv knew they were caught from the beginning, so they basically were just clinging on to dear life. Clearly yall arent intelligent enough to understand though.
Thats where you lose it. There's always a way. If Sandra heard the tap that's great game play by her and Dan needed to deflect better. You're 100% blaming production
Janelle mentioned in an interview that she deduced that Dan and Parvati were traitors partially because they had cameras following them all the time (advice she got from S1 players). Parvati also said that production was more about show first, game second.
Thats where you lose it. There's always a way. If Sandra heard the tap that's great game play by her and Dan needed to deflect better. You're 100% blaming production
Correct. As I acknowledged. However, there was suspicion with her already, so hearing that confirmed it for people like Sandra who already knew.
So how is that on production?
I didn't put that on production. Just said Parv was suspected for numerous reasons before she could even make a move so there was nothing she could do.
Thats where you lose it. There's always a way. If Sandra heard the tap that's great game play by her and Dan needed to deflect better. You're 100% blaming production
Correct. As I acknowledged. However, there was suspicion with her already, so hearing that confirmed it for people like Sandra who already knew.
So how is that on production?
I didn't put that on production. Just said Parv was suspected for numerous reasons before she could even make a move so there was nothing she could do.
yeag but her and Dan both seemed extremely awkward ofc they're suspects regardless of their BIG NAMES lol
Correct. As I acknowledged. However, there was suspicion with her already, so hearing that confirmed it for people like Sandra who already knew.
So how is that on production?
I didn't put that on production. Just said Parv was suspected for numerous reasons before she could even make a move so there was nothing she could do.
Thats where you lose it. There's always a way. If Sandra heard the tap that's great game play by her and Dan needed to deflect better. You're 100% blaming production
There's not with the format of the game.
im just not buying this
You don't have to buy it. I'm glad you don't. It makes the edited product more fun to watch I'm sure.
Im sure there are clues (ie cameras following some cast members more than others) that tip people off. I also highly doubt production cares. They are making a show first and foremost, and let's be real, the game is definitely secondary to that (duh) because if it wasn't, the traitors wouldn't be able to just endlessly replenish until they have the number of episodes they need. I'm sure production is also trying to protect valuable cast members like Parvati, Sandra, etc because they make for a better show.
that said, Dan still did a TERRIBLE job. Saying he had "no chance" might be true if Sandra knew it was him from the beginning, but he certainly did a horrible job anyway lol
that said, Dan still did a TERRIBLE job. Saying he had "no chance" might be true if Sandra knew it was him from the beginning, but he certainly did a horrible job anyway lol
I don't disagree with this. I just wonder if he would have played smarter if they didn't know it was him from the start.
Oh is this why OS immediately said something when I made that post regarding Davonne's video? **** that was my first time entering this thread and I had no knowledge of previous discussions going on. Once again my post was more about Davonne and not really about Dan.
But since he's the topic, he did a horrible job, especially because everyone stated their concerns with him and he still didnt change his behavior.
If the US keeps casting only reality stars for future seasons, do you think this has the potential to get boring with preseason alliances like the challenge?
These guys are production savvy they know production is picking big name strategist to be traitors. Dan knew he would be suspected to he kept a low-profile. Saying names and speaking up would have changed nothing, but his moves were bad too.
he was bad, edit or not. They are reality tv vets so obviously they have some idea what production's doing but he did nothing to make himself not suspicious lol
you know who else production might have picked? bananas.
real smart of dan to take out the only other big male name besides him and CT. Genius!
I don't know who 's this Johnny Fairplay guy aside from what little I saw from him in Micronesia but he is not that great of an interviewer
The edit made his game look less bad than it actually was because everyone was onto him, even the housewives who weren't savvy about any of the gamers reputation, Parv is the only one who got royaly screwed by production when they left her with MJ and Ekin Su in that funeral challenge, everyone thought that a traitor was among those remaining 3 because they knew the production would do such thing for ssome reason, when it was Ekin Su that got murdered they narrowed it down to Parv and MJ, and of course production won't pick someone like MJ to be a traitor, so they all thought it was Parv
It's always production's fault when you favorites play poorly. Pretending Dan played anything other than poorly is denial. Just like those claiming it hurts his legacy are wrong as well.
I only say him on house of villians and he is a weird m f
Can yall read? I said Dan and Parv made terrible decisions over and over, but I can also acknowledge there was nothing they could have done right. Sandra knew her or Parv would be one. I think it was also Sandra who said she heard Alan tap Dan. They were already on to Parv and then Larsa said she heard Alan touch her. This isn't Survivor or BB once the suspicion is there, you can't just flip the numbers cause the vote is basically just a test of your suspicisions. They have their suspicions and then are savvy enough to watch who production follows, films, etc. Dan and Parv knew they were caught from the beginning, so they basically were just clinging on to dear life. Clearly yall arent intelligent enough to understand though.
Oh boy...
Mo
Thats where you lose it. There's always a way. If Sandra heard the tap that's great game play by her and Dan needed to deflect better. You're 100% blaming production
Moo
Alan didn't even tap Parvati
Janelle mentioned in an interview that she deduced that Dan and Parvati were traitors partially because they had cameras following them all the time (advice she got from S1 players). Parvati also said that production was more about show first, game second.
Correct. As I acknowledged. However, there was suspicion with her already, so hearing that confirmed it for people like Sandra who already knew.
So how is that on production?
There's not with the format of the game.
I didn't put that on production. Just said Parv was suspected for numerous reasons before she could even make a move so there was nothing she could do.
im just not buying this
yeag but her and Dan both seemed extremely awkward ofc they're suspects regardless of their BIG NAMES lol
So were a lot of people
You don't have to buy it. I'm glad you don't. It makes the edited product more fun to watch I'm sure.
Im sure there are clues (ie cameras following some cast members more than others) that tip people off. I also highly doubt production cares. They are making a show first and foremost, and let's be real, the game is definitely secondary to that (duh) because if it wasn't, the traitors wouldn't be able to just endlessly replenish until they have the number of episodes they need. I'm sure production is also trying to protect valuable cast members like Parvati, Sandra, etc because they make for a better show.
that said, Dan still did a TERRIBLE job. Saying he had "no chance" might be true if Sandra knew it was him from the beginning, but he certainly did a horrible job anyway lol
I don't disagree with this. I just wonder if he would have played smarter if they didn't know it was him from the start.
Oh is this why OS immediately said something when I made that post regarding Davonne's video? **** that was my first time entering this thread and I had no knowledge of previous discussions going on. Once again my post was more about Davonne and not really about Dan.
But since he's the topic, he did a horrible job, especially because everyone stated their concerns with him and he still didnt change his behavior.
Huh? To the first part.
Those were their for tv reasons, they weren't valid lol. They can't say "productions decision was obvious".
*there
Thank you <3
Lmaooo it's just one of my pet peeves so I've gotta stay consistent!
If the US keeps casting only reality stars for future seasons, do you think this has the potential to get boring with preseason alliances like the challenge?
Pages