I don't think it's fair to try and diminish Dan or Parv's reputation based on this. It's hard to try and convince someone you aren't a traitor once the target is there, banishment is basically just a check and see if your right game.
I don't think it's fair to try and diminish Dan or Parv's reputation based on this. It's hard to try and convince someone you aren't a traitor once the target is there, banishment is basically just a check and see if your right game.
Am I the only one that would have still killed Peter?
I mean, it's tricky. I feel like Dan blew their games up on his way out. They were already onto Parvati anyways and now they are onto them both.
They're ****** if they do, ****** if they don't. IMO
That's a good point. I think the best plan would have been to vote out Peter and say how that screams it wasn't them because it's too obvious but there's too many people onto Parv.
Peter would be an idiot to decline the offer.
It depends on what he knows, if they told him if he declines there is no murder, it's smarter for him to decline and banish Parv next. If he has no idea what happens if he declines, then smart play is to accept, then still target Parv, then you replace two traitors, Dan and Parv, with two new traitors, Peter and whoever they recruit, who no one suspects
Even if they told him--the goal is to win all the money and you can only do that as a traitor. Plus, his crew would never suspect him even after this.
I don't think it's fair to try and diminish Dan or Parv's reputation based on this. It's hard to try and convince someone you aren't a traitor once the target is there, banishment is basically just a check and see if your right game.
who is doing that?
Just in general. You know these flip floppy fans will.
I don't think it's fair to try and diminish Dan or Parv's reputation based on this. It's hard to try and convince someone you aren't a traitor once the target is there, banishment is basically just a check and see if your right game.
who is doing that?
No one--Dan's great at BB but played horribly in this game. That doesn't change his past. Same with Parv though I don't think she's played poorly other than allowing Dan to vote for Bergie. She knew better.
Being a Traitor is tricky especially playing with production savvy people. Probably easy on the UK versions. People like Sandra & Janelle knew Dan and Parv were likely candidates for the role. If they do too much they get banished, and if they do too little there are sus and get banished. It's a tricky role to play and like I said when suspected it's hard to switch the target. You can mayne pull it off once but once that person is shown Faithful, you are done.
I don't want this to happen because I truly love Phaedra and Parvati together, but Parvati's best move might be to target Phaedra. As Trishelle clocked, Dan would target another traitor. Parvati can honestly point out to Peter than his plan outed Dan, and that Dan outed Phaedra. Obviously that is irrelevant if Peter is recruited, but that would have been a potentially solid plan for her.
I know this is typically a TERRIBLE strategy but with her back so far up against the wall does Parv have anything to lose by saying they attempted to recruit her? Peter could act like he believes it which would be a non-sus way for him to change the alliances vote.
I don't want this to happen because I truly love Phaedra and Parvati together, but Parvati's best move might be to target Phaedra. As Trishelle clocked, Dan would target another traitor. Parvati can honestly point out to Peter than his plan outed Dan, and that Dan outed Phaedra. Obviously that is irrelevant if Peter is recruited, but that would have been a potentially solid plan for her.
I was thinking the same thing but trying to justify another strategy to keep both girls safe. It's really her smartest move to put that in Sandra and Trishelle's ear cause didnt Janie say those were her only friends? She needs to do that and lay the guilt trip thick on Sandra that Sandra better not be playing her as the Traitor with the info.
I know this is typically a TERRIBLE strategy but with her back so far up against the wall does Parv have anything to lose by saying they attempted to recruit her? Peter could act like he believes it which would be a non-sus way for him to change the alliances vote.
The producers could support the theory to by making her last at breakfast.
Congrats to my NO SPOILER thread surpassing those spoilers freaks who had departure day and 4 extra months, to still be outshined by the NO SPOILER thread!
I feel like Pilot Pete's best play is to accept and then still vote out Parvati anyway. Then replace her with her with one of his minions (possibly Bergie, since he's close with Phaedra too).
slowly? Took you long enough! Get in line! He had me on love island when he had to name something that goes in his mouth and he said **** with no shame.
Peter best play imo is to accept and then come clean that they tried to recruit him but he declined it. He could easily spin that to put the final nail in Parvati's coffin. The fact that he got rid of 2 traitors by then would make no one even suspect him and he could take it all in the end.
Nah she's playing great she's literally about to have Peter as her little puppet as she picks his alliance off 1 by 1
How you figure that? Peter can just as easily accept, find out who the traitors are and have his alliance still target Parvati/Phaedra and recruit someone else.
Nah she's playing great she's literally about to have Peter as her little puppet as she picks his alliance off 1 by 1
How you figure that? Peter can just as easily accept, find out who the traitors are and have his alliance still target Parvati/Phaedra and recruit someone else.
Agreed which is why I would have killed Peter but I don't think she's playing bad. Dan hurt her game more than anything.
Nah she's playing great she's literally about to have Peter as her little puppet as she picks his alliance off 1 by 1
How you figure that? Peter can just as easily accept, find out who the traitors are and have his alliance still target Parvati/Phaedra and recruit someone else.
Agreed which is why I would have killed Peter but I don't think she's playing bad. Dan hurt her game more than anything.
Yeah I do wonder if she'd fought harder against trying to murder Bergie how it would have worked out. It would have at least cast a bit of doubt in Peter's mind (or they could have murdered Peter of course), and she would be in a better place than she is now.
I don't think it's fair to try and diminish Dan or Parv's reputation based on this. It's hard to try and convince someone you aren't a traitor once the target is there, banishment is basically just a check and see if your right game.
who is doing that?
Someone in this thread was asking about Dan ruining his legacy.
I've also seen similar things on social media, though I think mainly from people who didn't watch Dan on BB.
I read that long *** Parv interview, as I figured the yoga stuff has made her to holy to the black widow persona. She did get petty talking about Lardsa, while claiming she was above the petty lol.
I am watching Janelle on a podcast with Fairply and Rachel, and she said Dan's real mistake was not saying Phaedra's name earlier. Janelle said Phaedra's name was out there a bit, and because Dan had said when he shoots he doesn't miss they were waiting for a name. She said Phaedra was a more dangerous traitor than Dan or Parvati, so if he'd said her name a couple banishments ago people would have gone for it.
But the real tea is that Fairplay claims Sandra watched every season of Traitors in every language before going on the show and didn't pick up on how the last people to breakfast were the ones nearly murdered. Surely that can't be true?!?! Janelle said she told the breakfast thing to the people she was working with, so maybe it really wasn't a known thing in general. Crazy.
I don't think it's fair to try and diminish Dan or Parv's reputation based on this. It's hard to try and convince someone you aren't a traitor once the target is there, banishment is basically just a check and see if your right game.
who is doing that?
Even if they told him--the goal is to win all the money and you can only do that as a traitor. Plus, his crew would never suspect him even after this.
Just in general. You know these flip floppy fans will.
No one--Dan's great at BB but played horribly in this game. That doesn't change his past. Same with Parv though I don't think she's played poorly other than allowing Dan to vote for Bergie. She knew better.
Being a Traitor is tricky especially playing with production savvy people. Probably easy on the UK versions. People like Sandra & Janelle knew Dan and Parv were likely candidates for the role. If they do too much they get banished, and if they do too little there are sus and get banished. It's a tricky role to play and like I said when suspected it's hard to switch the target. You can mayne pull it off once but once that person is shown Faithful, you are done.
this sh it was so funny
I don't want this to happen because I truly love Phaedra and Parvati together, but Parvati's best move might be to target Phaedra. As Trishelle clocked, Dan would target another traitor. Parvati can honestly point out to Peter than his plan outed Dan, and that Dan outed Phaedra. Obviously that is irrelevant if Peter is recruited, but that would have been a potentially solid plan for her.
I know this is typically a TERRIBLE strategy but with her back so far up against the wall does Parv have anything to lose by saying they attempted to recruit her? Peter could act like he believes it which would be a non-sus way for him to change the alliances vote.
I was thinking the same thing but trying to justify another strategy to keep both girls safe. It's really her smartest move to put that in Sandra and Trishelle's ear cause didnt Janie say those were her only friends? She needs to do that and lay the guilt trip thick on Sandra that Sandra better not be playing her as the Traitor with the info.
The producers could support the theory to by making her last at breakfast.
Congrats to my NO SPOILER thread surpassing those spoilers freaks who had departure day and 4 extra months, to still be outshined by the NO SPOILER thread!
Bergie is slowly turning attractive to me.
I feel like Pilot Pete's best play is to accept and then still vote out Parvati anyway. Then replace her with her with one of his minions (possibly Bergie, since he's close with Phaedra too).
slowly? Took you long enough! Get in line! He had me on love island when he had to name something that goes in his mouth and he said **** with no shame.
Dan Gheeing and Rob Cesternino for Rivals 4
Parvati is doing so bad. So obvious.
Peter best play imo is to accept and then come clean that they tried to recruit him but he declined it. He could easily spin that to put the final nail in Parvati's coffin. The fact that he got rid of 2 traitors by then would make no one even suspect him and he could take it all in the end.
Nah she's playing great she's literally about to have Peter as her little puppet as she picks his alliance off 1 by 1
How you figure that? Peter can just as easily accept, find out who the traitors are and have his alliance still target Parvati/Phaedra and recruit someone else.
I can see them carrying Parv along like they did Kate last season, there's really no reason to kill her. Killing Dan was dumb too.
Agreed which is why I would have killed Peter but I don't think she's playing bad. Dan hurt her game more than anything.
Yeah I do wonder if she'd fought harder against trying to murder Bergie how it would have worked out. It would have at least cast a bit of doubt in Peter's mind (or they could have murdered Peter of course), and she would be in a better place than she is now.
Someone in this thread was asking about Dan ruining his legacy.
I've also seen similar things on social media, though I think mainly from people who didn't watch Dan on BB.
I read that long *** Parv interview, as I figured the yoga stuff has made her to holy to the black widow persona. She did get petty talking about Lardsa, while claiming she was above the petty lol.
Lol she did, but then so did Janelle (though Janelle has never claimed to be above pettiness lol) so maybe Larsa really was a lot.
I am watching Janelle on a podcast with Fairply and Rachel, and she said Dan's real mistake was not saying Phaedra's name earlier. Janelle said Phaedra's name was out there a bit, and because Dan had said when he shoots he doesn't miss they were waiting for a name. She said Phaedra was a more dangerous traitor than Dan or Parvati, so if he'd said her name a couple banishments ago people would have gone for it.
But the real tea is that Fairplay claims Sandra watched every season of Traitors in every language before going on the show and didn't pick up on how the last people to breakfast were the ones nearly murdered. Surely that can't be true?!?! Janelle said she told the breakfast thing to the people she was working with, so maybe it really wasn't a known thing in general. Crazy.
Neither ruined their legacy. Not even a little bit. You can keep dreaming though
She has me triggered every episode. She's so stupid
Janelle embraces the pettiness and that's why I love her.
Pages