The Challenge: World Championship- Darrell L Taylor

147 posts / 0 new
Last post

WT and CD was the feud I didn't know I needed. Vevmo needs a new villain and I'm enjoying WT taking on that role.

Puts the L in Darrell

I enjoy his partnership with Kiki

Puts the L in Darrell

Huh?

Wes tracked is that you in ur pfp?

Easily the star of the season!

Easily the star of the season!

 

Once Darrell wins a season he can retire, but till then he will be on another 5 seasons

Kiki + Darrell were why superfans kept watching this season, the best team of the season! 

He's lovely Smile

He's lovely

Hes a fine wine

Hes a flop

Idc if y'all praise him for his 4 mediocre wins that were mostly team wins back in 1900 he sucks and is always overrated

1900? Bffr. His first show aired in 2002. At least he didnt have to use roids to get a W

Idc if y'all praise him for his 4 mediocre wins that were mostly team wins back in 1900 he sucks and is always overrated

He has 7 wins technically. While your girl continously flops even on roids. She can only win against an obese and an emaciated chick and only won because the obese chick was injured. So I know you of all people aren't coming for Darrelegend.

fact that everyone arguign about darrell is the most drama in the S39 spoiler thread is WHY he should be brought back 

he will get his win, not even bothered  

I don't think it's entirely fair to trivialize his wins because of the era. That's no one's fault how the show was set up then.

Even good competitors back then weren't securing four wins back-to-back. Never mind that FM is no different from modern formats with it being in pairs, and the teams that season would give a lot of recent duos a run for their money.

The people we say would benefit from the previous era could still not have won. Look at what happened to the vets on Gauntlet 2.

Champs today could very well have never been champs back then. It's easy to say those wins are lesser but this game is nuanced and easier finals with more people didn't make everyone a four-time champ. Not Abe, Brad, Evelyn, Coral, Rachel etc.

 

Idc if y'all praise him for his 4 mediocre wins that were mostly team wins back in 1900 he sucks and is always overrated

how does he suck tho? hes made plenty of finals since then and won tons of elims/dailies.

Kang forever

Kang forever

Kang forever

I don't think it's entirely fair to trivialize his wins because of the era. That's no one's fault how the show was set up then.

Even good competitors back then weren't securing four wins back-to-back. Never mind that FM is no different from modern formats with it being in pairs, and the teams that season would give a lot of recent duos a run for their money.

The people we say would benefit from the previous era could still not have won. Look at what happened to the vets on Gauntlet 2.

Champs today could very well have never been champs back then. It's easy to say those wins are lesser but this game is nuanced and easier finals with more people didn't make everyone a four-time champ. Not Abe, Brad, Evelyn, Coral, Rachel etc.

 

these people act like his 2 near wins on all stars and DA aren't impressive too, it's pure Hater-itis 

A whole man.

i guess he's just held to a different standard but thats ok

Z a d d y

Kang forever

whenever darrell isnt cast/eliminated on a season, it's a flop season 

sla - worst season of all time, all stars 3 - boring after he left,  ride or dies - boring after veronica/him and jay/michelle left

usa 2 - awful season besides winners, s39 - worst season since SLA 

maybe cast him every season and the show improves? seems like a pattern. 

Pages