So instead of it being the last two pairs (Two M/M Pairs) that are missing it’s Brad and Kyles partners that are missing.. would make better sense then a Brad and kyle pairing (and keeping the Landon comeback theory alive)
I mean Seasons 2-present has had at least 1 rookie. I was thinking season 23-31 not counting the Exes before
You worded it incorrectly in your original post, that’s why I misunderstood. Your rude response to me telling me to “reread and comprehend”, which was deleted, was unnecessary. Some of the posters on this site are so defensive.
Razor wrote:Unless the missing pair is a strong team I feel like this may be the first season since Seasons 2 where a rookie doesn't make the final
Dustin, Devyn, JD, Zach, Ashley, Sam, and Frank were all rookies..
JD was on Cutthroat and Dustin was on Battle of The Exes
i think they meant before seasons 2 which was exes and ty/emily ct/diem and banans/camilia
Ty and Emily were still rookies. Rookies aren’t “first time Challengers”, they are Challengers who are on their first of second challenge, by Challenge terms. The Island was the last final without a true rookie, if im not mistaking.
Razor wrote:Unless the missing pair is a strong team I feel like this may be the first season since Seasons 2 where a rookie doesn't make the final
Dustin, Devyn, JD, Zach, Ashley, Sam, and Frank were all rookies..
JD was on Cutthroat and Dustin was on Battle of The Exes
Are rookies not someone who has competed in 0 or 1 challenges?
Thats if you go by Gauntlet rules which I kinda go by, although people were being called Veterans on Vendettas after only one appearance which didn't settle with me
I would probably act like abram too since you can’t square up with a female. She is annoying af and I would likely need a lawyer too if I had to tolerate her. And what they are fighting about is her bad if he told her straight up he had no money. But who put that on you tube and why lol
Razor wrote:Unless the missing pair is a strong team I feel like this may be the first season since Seasons 2 where a rookie doesn't make the final
Dustin, Devyn, JD, Zach, Ashley, Sam, and Frank were all rookies..
JD was on Cutthroat and Dustin was on Battle of The Exes
i think they meant before seasons 2 which was exes and ty/emily ct/diem and banans/camilia
Ty and Emily were still rookies. Rookies aren’t “first time Challengers”, they are Challengers who are on their first of second challenge, by Challenge terms. The Island was the last final without a true rookie, if im not mistaking.edit sorry, just Emily. Forgot ty was on Rivals.
Vendettas was calling Nicole Z a vet after being in only 1 challenge.
Razor wrote:Unless the missing pair is a strong team I feel like this may be the first season since Seasons 2 where a rookie doesn't make the final
Dustin, Devyn, JD, Zach, Ashley, Sam, and Frank were all rookies..
JD was on Cutthroat and Dustin was on Battle of The Exes
Are rookies not someone who has competed in 0 or 1 challenges?
Thats if you go by Gauntlet rules which I kinda go by, although people were being called Veterans on Vendettas after only one appearance which didn't settle with me
Yeah they didn’t start considering people who had only done one challenge veterans until after Bloodlines. I remember Christina and Nicole being called vets during rivals 3 lmaoo
I would probably act like abram too since you can’t square up with a female. She is annoying af and I would likely need a lawyer too if I had to tolerate her. And what they are fighting about is her bad if he told her straight up he had no money. But who put that on you tube and why lol
Yeah I agree. Seems like the fight is her fault and she's shitty for that honestly.
You're regular in my mind if you break the rookie barrier twice (4 challenges), I also go by that because back in the day they had a 4-timers chart on the Challenge's wikipedia page while its five now.
Razor wrote:Unless the missing pair is a strong team I feel like this may be the first season since Seasons 2 where a rookie doesn't make the final
Dustin, Devyn, JD, Zach, Ashley, Sam, and Frank were all rookies..
JD was on Cutthroat and Dustin was on Battle of The Exes
i think they meant before seasons 2 which was exes and ty/emily ct/diem and banans/camilia
Ty and Emily were still rookies. Rookies aren’t “first time Challengers”, they are Challengers who are on their first of second challenge, by Challenge terms. The Island was the last final without a true rookie, if im not mistaking.edit sorry, just Emily. Forgot ty was on Rivals.
by Challenge terms after 1 season they consider you a vet, at least that’s what Dirty 30 showed us
Razor wrote:Unless the missing pair is a strong team I feel like this may be the first season since Seasons 2 where a rookie doesn't make the final
Dustin, Devyn, JD, Zach, Ashley, Sam, and Frank were all rookies..
JD was on Cutthroat and Dustin was on Battle of The Exes
i think they meant before seasons 2 which was exes and ty/emily ct/diem and banans/camilia
Ty and Emily were still rookies. Rookies aren’t “first time Challengers”, they are Challengers who are on their first of second challenge, by Challenge terms. The Island was the last final without a true rookie, if im not mistaking.edit sorry, just Emily. Forgot ty was on Rivals.
Vendettas was calling Nicole Z a vet after being in only 1 challenge.
I’m aware. But considering they’ll probably never do another Vets vs. Rookies season, they’re probably just calling everyone who’s done a Challenge a veteran now. I will always follow the rules that were originally set seasons and seasons ago.
About that video Abraham has actual burns on his face and multiple mug shots in his name, he’s a shitty person. Disliking Cara shouldn’t cloud you about him. he has no sympathy from me
Out of the BB19 people the only ones I can see getting on the Challenge are Jessica, Cody & maybe Mark.
Cody was pretty boring and quite overrated in general. He was only liked by fans because he was the only person who didn't trust Paul. I hate to say it but it'd be interesting to see Paul or someone like Josh in a challenge house. Cody's challenge debut would probably be very similar to Victor's and we don't need that.
Him and Jessica can both stay home they weren't interesting in the least on big brother. How about all of bb19 stay home and we don't talk about them again.
Dustin, Devyn, JD, Zach, Ashley, Sam, and Frank were all rookies..
So instead of it being the last two pairs (Two M/M Pairs) that are missing it’s Brad and Kyles partners that are missing.. would make better sense then a Brad and kyle pairing (and keeping the Landon comeback theory alive)
She can do that on Teen Mom and any other show she gets on. Not on the Challenge.
When tge missing pair are from catfish
JD was on Cutthroat and Dustin was on Battle of The Exes
I mean Seasons 2-present has had at least 1 rookie. I was thinking season 23-31 not counting the Exes before
Did they win or are they currently in redemption?
i think they meant before seasons 2 which was exes and ty/emily ct/diem and banans/camilia
You worded it incorrectly in your original post, that’s why I misunderstood. Your rude response to me telling me to “reread and comprehend”, which was deleted, was unnecessary. Some of the posters on this site are so defensive.
Are rookies not someone who has competed in 0 or 1 challenges?
Ty and Emily were still rookies. Rookies aren’t “first time Challengers”, they are Challengers who are on their first of second challenge, by Challenge terms. The Island was the last final without a true rookie, if im not mistaking.
edit sorry, just Emily. Forgot ty was on Rivals.
Thats if you go by Gauntlet rules which I kinda go by, although people were being called Veterans on Vendettas after only one appearance which didn't settle with me
I would probably act like abram too since you can’t square up with a female. She is annoying af and I would likely need a lawyer too if I had to tolerate her. And what they are fighting about is her bad if he told her straight up he had no money. But who put that on you tube and why lol
Vendettas was calling Nicole Z a vet after being in only 1 challenge.
Yeah they didn’t start considering people who had only done one challenge veterans until after Bloodlines. I remember Christina and Nicole being called vets during rivals 3 lmaoo
If you've done 1 challenge you're a vet by current standards.
Yeah I agree. Seems like the fight is her fault and she's shitty for that honestly.
You're regular in my mind if you break the rookie barrier twice (4 challenges), I also go by that because back in the day they had a 4-timers chart on the Challenge's wikipedia page while its five now.
by Challenge terms after 1 season they consider you a vet, at least that’s what Dirty 30 showed us
Abram and Thomas mercenary team will have you guys shook
I’m aware. But considering they’ll probably never do another Vets vs. Rookies season, they’re probably just calling everyone who’s done a Challenge a veteran now. I will always follow the rules that were originally set seasons and seasons ago.
About that video Abraham has actual burns on his face and multiple mug shots in his name, he’s a shitty person. Disliking Cara shouldn’t cloud you about him. he has no sympathy from me
I wish *sighs*
The producers are also calling people like Aneesa a champion so the current standards can take a hike.
I'M QUAKING
Him and Jessica can both stay home they weren't interesting in the least on big brother. How about all of bb19 stay home and we don't talk about them again.
Nat
Would Thomas even agree to be anywhere abram is? He was scared shitless
Huh you guys confused me
It's not like Abram has ever hit anyone on a show....oh wait
Pages