I think my favorite storyline from all Survivor has to be the Colby/Jerri relationship. From mortal enemies on AO with Colby getting her out, to then Jerri getting her revenge on AS, to then them becoming friends on Hvv.
DScott wrote:Yeah Jerri would of super won that season. Russell is definitely the biggest meat shield goat ever.
She wouldn't. Either hero or Sandra was winning that season.
Hero wins over Jerri, but I think Jerri wins over Sandra. She definitely wins against Russell, Parv or Danielle.
Considering Parv is the final juror, I would say its 5-4-0 or 6-3-0 in Sandra's favor.
Courtney, Amanda, Candice, Rupert and Parv are voting for Sandra. JT is in the air, with leaning towards Sandra. Coach, Colby and Danielle are for Jerri.
I love Parvati and I would love to see her being only 2 times winner but I think Sandra winning that season was deserved.
Sandra deserved it but i feel like Parvati deserved it more. Sandra played much better this season. Had she not been a 2 time winner she couldve gotten much further.
Sandra just had better relations with the Jurors and a more sellable story given that she did try to help the Heros but they **** themselves up. Parvati killed it.
Sandra just had better relations with the Jurors and a more sellable story given that she did try to help the Heros but they **** themselves up. Parvati killed it.
Sandra wasnt a target from the very start. The best thing she did was convince Russell to get rid of the dragon slayer.
I completely agree, Parvati did the best she could. She is an amazing player. She was just stuck with a troll.
Her failing this time was going along with Russell and being an ******* to everyone.
If she didn't have to keep Russell around for protection, I think she could've turned the game around. But she was too scared to send him on his way. She's not dumb, she knew losing him would make her a bigger target. I wish she would've had more faith in herself. If anyone could've saved her, it's her. She should've at least given it a shot.
Yeah maybe. I think she thought that she could win anyway which was probably the mistake she made. I do believe if the jury wasnt bitter and was voting based on gameplay she couldve won easy.
Unpopular opinion:- Russells move with Tyson was better than all of Sandras gameplay that season.
Yeah maybe. I think she thought that she could win anyway which was probably the mistake she made. I do believe if the jury wasnt bitter and was voting based on gameplay she couldve won easy. Unpopular opinion:- Russells move with Tyson was better than all of Sandras gameplay that season.
Yeah maybe. I think she thought that she could win anyway which was probably the mistake she made. I do believe if the jury wasnt bitter and was voting based on gameplay she couldve won easy. Unpopular opinion:- Russells move with Tyson was better than all of Sandras gameplay that season.
That was not Russell's move.. That was Tyson's.
Lol. Getting yourself voted out is an amazing move then. Tyson should be on game changers.
InternationalFan wrote:Yeah maybe. I think she thought that she could win anyway which was probably the mistake she made. I do believe if the jury wasnt bitter and was voting based on gameplay she couldve won easy. Unpopular opinion:- Russells move with Tyson was better than all of Sandras gameplay that season.
That was not Russell's move.. That was Tyson's.
Lol. Getting yourself voted out is an amazing move then. Tyson should be on game changers.
Exactly. **** that's why he was in the running for "Dumbest Move Ever" at the Reunion that season. But that's ok doe cuz Daddy came and got his mil a few seasons later.
Sandra just had better relations with the Jurors and a more sellable story given that she did try to help the Heros but they **** themselves up. Parvati killed it.
Sandra wasnt a target from the very start. The best thing she did was convince Russell to get rid of the dragon slayer.
Facts, but that doesn't take away from Sandra having better relations with the Heroes. I never said Sandra had the best game. She just had the best relations with the majority of the Jury.
Facts, but that doesn't take away from Sandra having better relations with the Heroes. I never said Sandra had the best game. She just had the best relations with the majority of the Jury.
Agreed. I think even if Sandra had no relationship with the heroes she still wouldve got their vote. Parvati and Russell are at negative so her being zero would still be enough.
maybe parvati shouldnt go along laughing at JTs letter
sandra at the end of the day had better relations with the jury. do i think parvati played a good game? yes very much so considering the target she had from day one.
Facts, but that doesn't take away from Sandra having better relations with the Heroes. I never said Sandra had the best game. She just had the best relations with the majority of the Jury.
Agreed. I think even if Sandra had no relationship with the heroes she still wouldve got their vote. Parvati and Russell are at negative so her being zero would still be enough.
I'm not entirely sure. If I recal correctly, Rupert did commend Parvati for playing her game. The biggest issue was her playing so closely with Russel and she had valid reasoning for such. I think had Sandra had no relation with the Jury Parvati would've taken it. IDk, haven't rewatched it in a WHILE.
As both a Parvati and Sandra fan, I think Parv deserved to win but if I was on the jury Parv definitely gets my vote. Parv came in with the biggest target and went with the only options she had Danielle and Russell. I feel like she made the most moves and played the best game and lost because of Amanda and Candice's jealousy. Sandra's whole game consisted of trying to get rid of a guy who still made it to the end. She won not based on her moves but based on the fact that she was the only one who could claim she tried to work with the heroes. Respectable game and it worked but Parv made the best moves IMO.
As both a Parvati and Sandra fan, I think Parv deserved to win but if I was on the jury Parv definitely gets my vote. Parv came in with the biggest target and went with the only options she had Danielle and Russell. I feel like she made the most moves and played the best game and lost because of Amanda and Candice's jealousy. Sandra's whole game consisted of trying to get rid of a guy who still made it to the end. She won not based on her moves but based on the fact that she was the only one who could claim she tried to work with the heroes. Respectable game and it worked but Parv made the best moves IMO.
This is so true. Fair enough Parv didnt build a relationship with most of the heroes, but she came in as friends with both of them. Amanda tried to screw her over and then got bitter when she got outplayed. Candice was such a *****. Parvati was on her side, and voted rupert with her. Whereas Sandra voted Candice out. 2 Jealous******* is 100% correct.
Had HvV took place around now- Parvati would have won hands down. Russell would have a chance too. The thing is Jurors on that season were still old school-ish aka more bitter towards people who outplayed them. Now social game isnt that important for jurors (save for KR!)
Had HvV took place around now- Parvati would have won hands down. Russell would have a chance too. The thing is Jurors on that season were still old school-ish aka more bitter towards people who outplayed them. Now social game isnt that important for jurors (save for KR!)
He was cool in cagayan but second chances Spencer was a complete letdown.
lol
I think my favorite storyline from all Survivor has to be the Colby/Jerri relationship. From mortal enemies on AO with Colby getting her out, to then Jerri getting her revenge on AS, to then them becoming friends on Hvv.
Considering Parv is the final juror, I would say its 5-4-0 or 6-3-0 in Sandra's favor.
Courtney, Amanda, Candice, Rupert and Parv are voting for Sandra. JT is in the air, with leaning towards Sandra. Coach, Colby and Danielle are for Jerri.
I love Parvati and I would love to see her being only 2 times winner but I think Sandra winning that season was deserved.
Sandra deserved it but i feel like Parvati deserved it more. Sandra played much better this season. Had she not been a 2 time winner she couldve gotten much further.
I could tear apart Sandra's game on HvV but I know yall like her lol.
If it was Sandra, Parv, Jerri- Sandra still wins.
Sandra, Russell, Jerri- I could see Jerri, but still giving this one to Sandra.
Parv, Russell, Jerri- Jerri hands down.
As much as I love Parvati, she was not robbed on HvV. She lost that shit in a clear decisive way.
I disagree. She played the best game that she could. Better than anyone could. Or maybe im completely biased lol
***** SHE WENT TO TRIBAL AND WAS HANDING OUT IDOLS LIKE HER NAME WAS PARVATI CLAUSE.
Lol.
But she maneuvered the **** out of that cast. From early first boot target to making it all the way to the end.
Sandra just had better relations with the Jurors and a more sellable story given that she did try to help the Heros but they **** themselves up. Parvati killed it.
Sandra wasnt a target from the very start. The best thing she did was convince Russell to get rid of the dragon slayer.
I completely agree, Parvati did the best she could. She is an amazing player. She was just stuck with a troll.
Her failing this time was going along with Russell and being an ******* to everyone.
If she didn't have to keep Russell around for protection, I think she could've turned the game around. But she was too scared to send him on his way. She's not dumb, she knew losing him would make her a bigger target. I wish she would've had more faith in herself. If anyone could've saved her, it's her. She should've at least given it a shot.
Yeah maybe. I think she thought that she could win anyway which was probably the mistake she made. I do believe if the jury wasnt bitter and was voting based on gameplay she couldve won easy.
Unpopular opinion:- Russells move with Tyson was better than all of Sandras gameplay that season.
That was not Russell's move.. That was Tyson's.
Lol. Getting yourself voted out is an amazing move then. Tyson should be on game changers.
Exactly. **** that's why he was in the running for "Dumbest Move Ever" at the Reunion that season. But that's ok doe cuz Daddy came and got his mil a few seasons later.
Facts, but that doesn't take away from Sandra having better relations with the Heroes. I never said Sandra had the best game. She just had the best relations with the majority of the Jury.
Agreed. I think even if Sandra had no relationship with the heroes she still wouldve got their vote. Parvati and Russell are at negative so her being zero would still be enough.
maybe parvati shouldnt go along laughing at JTs letter
sandra at the end of the day had better relations with the jury. do i think parvati played a good game? yes very much so considering the target she had from day one.
Do it
I'm not entirely sure. If I recal correctly, Rupert did commend Parvati for playing her game. The biggest issue was her playing so closely with Russel and she had valid reasoning for such. I think had Sandra had no relation with the Jury Parvati would've taken it. IDk, haven't rewatched it in a WHILE.
As both a Parvati and Sandra fan, I think Parv deserved to win but if I was on the jury Parv definitely gets my vote. Parv came in with the biggest target and went with the only options she had Danielle and Russell. I feel like she made the most moves and played the best game and lost because of Amanda and Candice's jealousy. Sandra's whole game consisted of trying to get rid of a guy who still made it to the end. She won not based on her moves but based on the fact that she was the only one who could claim she tried to work with the heroes. Respectable game and it worked but Parv made the best moves IMO.
This is so true. Fair enough Parv didnt build a relationship with most of the heroes, but she came in as friends with both of them. Amanda tried to screw her over and then got bitter when she got outplayed. Candice was such a *****. Parvati was on her side, and voted rupert with her. Whereas Sandra voted Candice out. 2 Jealous******* is 100% correct.
Had HvV took place around now- Parvati would have won hands down. Russell would have a chance too. The thing is Jurors on that season were still old school-ish aka more bitter towards people who outplayed them. Now social game isnt that important for jurors (save for KR!)
Agreed.
Sandra> Parvarti>>>> everyone else
Pages