The Challenge: Generic Thread

69913 posts / 0 new
Last post

Why were Naomi's lips so chapped on Rivals 2 btw?

Ugh I just imagined if Frank didn't retire him & Jonna could've been partners for next season. "Screw you Frank!"

Rewatched BOTS2 Finale and after a clue saying 1st place gets a 10 minute advantage, 2nd place gets 5 minutes and "all others" get 0 minutes I think that confirms if Jonna/Derek beat Zach/Ashley then it would've been a 4 team final and they would've edited over TJ saying 3 teams make the final with the cheap voice overs they do all the time.

*cheap show with cheap challenges* 

*wins 250k all for self* I Love Money

*shares 250k between 4 people after grueling challenges on BOTS2*

202mitch wrote:

a trip down memory lane

I just watched that video and I gotta say that was as refreshing as an Ice cold Pepsi. Watching actual RW/RR castmembers(mostly) talk drama and fun and such was really cool...Back when this show was acutally about Real World and Road Rulers coming together to compete **** with each other in various ways(With G3 D1 and FM1 being exceptions) If only these shows were even half as good(and pure) as those were now...

You must know that you sound like the challenge Hitler when you say shit like this.

Ugh I just imagined if Frank didn't retire him & Jonna could've been partners for next season. "Screw you Frank!"

frank & Jonna are friends. 

Debut Album wrote:

202mitch wrote:a trip down memory lane

I just watched that video and I gotta say that was as refreshing as an Ice cold Pepsi. Watching actual RW/RR castmembers(mostly) talk drama and fun and such was really cool...Back when this show was acutally about Real World and Road Rulers coming together to compete **** with each other in various ways(With G3 D1 and FM1 being exceptions) If only these shows were even half as good(and pure) as those were now...

You must know that you sound like the challenge Hitler when you say shit like this.

You must know that I really don't give a ****.

They would've had Frank with Nany. That would've been one of the REAL co-ed rivalries & one of the pairs that justified the format in the first place. The fact that they couldn't get Frank, Jordan/Nia and either Zach/Trey with Marie should've told them to scrap it for another year or not do it at all.

Kellyanne also should've been with Darrell b/c that fight with Jamie looks lame. Darrell/Kellyanne caused mayhem in the house.

timster3 wrote:

Ugh I just imagined if Frank didn't retire him & Jonna could've been partners for next season. "Screw you Frank!"

frank & Jonna are friends. 

Still? I thought they had a falling out.

KennyER wrote:Debut Album wrote:KennyER wrote:Debut Album wrote:KennyER wrote:Br***Hat wrote:v123 wrote:Bananas lack of self awareness and propensity to do the righteous thing is really quite disturbing. I honestly think he really might be evil or mentally disabled. The part of the brain that governs your integrity and virtues is probably severely messed up in his case. I wonder if he was born this wayhaving Abe in this episode really highlighted how messed up in the brain bananas is. The way Abe went about in his confessions about how bananas has the seamless ability to lie and scam and exploit people just for some cash like just really emphasized the entire nany backstabbing situation and how it is very likely that bananas could very well be a functioning sociopath Extreme much?  I don't think Bananas is a so far out there to be a sociopath.  I just think he's very selfish.  He talks about friends, but if you really watch how he acts, its a lot more about what they can do for him than what he can do for them.  Then like most people do, he sees it in a light where it makes him look good.  The challenge just makes selfishness shine a lot brighter.  If he was a sociopath, I think we'd be seeing some pretty bad stuff happening that just isn't.But I do like how Abe is handling Bananas right now.  He's totally messing with him and from all appearances, Bananas seems to think it's just coincidence.  I dno't know if this is a good strategy for Abe to win or not, but its sure fun to watch.Bananas will make the next power move. Telling Abram about Thomas and Cara will break that trio up and turn the rookies against Abram.If he does that then he will be EVEN MORE of a piece of shit than he alrady is.Abram is coming after him. The move needs to be made now that he only has like Aneesa who won't send him in.It doesn't matter. The only one that needs to be telling Abram that is Cara. It's not his place to be opening his mouth about that even if it does mean his *** if he doesn't.All is fair in love, war, and ************** that. That's a line you don't cross regardless of the game. It's being messy and putting yourself in the middle of something that's none of your buisness to begin with. And if someone did that shit to him he wouldn't be saying "all is fair in love, war, and challenges" so he shouldn't be doing that to anyone else.

Karma lol Cara did it to him after Rivals. I have heard that cara confirm on her formspring that Camila/Johnny slept together during cutthroat/Rivals. Thats how his gf (x now) found out about it, even though she heard rumors and saw the shit they should have shown on cutthroat but a cast member confirming it was all she needed .

timster3 wrote:Ugh I just imagined if Frank didn't retire him & Jonna could've been partners for next season. "Screw you Frank!"frank & Jonna are friends.

He screw her over Rivals 2 , enough footage all they need.

They are not close anymore.

They would've had Frank with Nany. That would've been one of the REAL co-ed rivalries & one of the pairs that justified the format in the first place. The fact that they couldn't get Frank, Jordan/Nia and either Zach/Trey with Marie should've told them to scrap it for another year or not do it at all.Kellyanne also should've been with Darrell b/c that fight with Jamie looks lame. Darrell/Kellyanne caused mayhem in the house.

KellyAnne was the reason but the mayhem was more Wes vs Darrell. I think they wanted a decent amount of bloodline representation so Jamie/KellyAnne trumps Darrell/KellyAnne here anyway. 

They would've had Frank with Nany. That would've been one of the REAL co-ed rivalries & one of the pairs that justified the format in the first place. The fact that they couldn't get Frank, Jordan/Nia and either Zach/Trey with Marie should've told them to scrap it for another year or not do it at all.Kellyanne also should've been with Darrell b/c that fight with Jamie looks lame. Darrell/Kellyanne caused mayhem in the house.

I agree. Frank/Nany alone would've made the format worth a shit. Same thing with. Darrell and KellyAnne. Trey/Marie ******* Zach. Trey would be a better partner in the long run).

Frank/Nany, Marie/Trey, Nia/Jordan, Cooke/Dustin ugggghhhhhhhh

Debut Album wrote:

KennyER wrote:Debut Album wrote:KennyER wrote:Debut Album wrote:KennyER wrote:Br***Hat wrote:v123 wrote:Bananas lack of self awareness and propensity to do the righteous thing is really quite disturbing. I honestly think he really might be evil or mentally disabled. The part of the brain that governs your integrity and virtues is probably severely messed up in his case. I wonder if he was born this wayhaving Abe in this episode really highlighted how messed up in the brain bananas is. The way Abe went about in his confessions about how bananas has the seamless ability to lie and scam and exploit people just for some cash like just really emphasized the entire nany backstabbing situation and how it is very likely that bananas could very well be a functioning sociopath Extreme much?  I don't think Bananas is a so far out there to be a sociopath.  I just think he's very selfish.  He talks about friends, but if you really watch how he acts, its a lot more about what they can do for him than what he can do for them.  Then like most people do, he sees it in a light where it makes him look good.  The challenge just makes selfishness shine a lot brighter.  If he was a sociopath, I think we'd be seeing some pretty bad stuff happening that just isn't.But I do like how Abe is handling Bananas right now.  He's totally messing with him and from all appearances, Bananas seems to think it's just coincidence.  I dno't know if this is a good strategy for Abe to win or not, but its sure fun to watch.Bananas will make the next power move. Telling Abram about Thomas and Cara will break that trio up and turn the rookies against Abram.If he does that then he will be EVEN MORE of a piece of shit than he alrady is.Abram is coming after him. The move needs to be made now that he only has like Aneesa who won't send him in.It doesn't matter. The only one that needs to be telling Abram that is Cara. It's not his place to be opening his mouth about that even if it does mean his *** if he doesn't.All is fair in love, war, and ************** that. That's a line you don't cross regardless of the game. It's being messy and putting yourself in the middle of something that's none of your buisness to begin with. And if someone did that shit to him he wouldn't be saying "all is fair in love, war, and challenges" so he shouldn't be doing that to anyone else.

Karma lol Cara did it to him after Rivals. I have heard that cara confirm on her formspring that Camila/Johnny slept together during cutthroat/Rivals. Thats how his gf (x now) found out about it, even though she heard rumors and saw the shit they should have shown on cutthroat but a cast member confirming it was all she needed .

Well that was shitty of Cara to do but I still don't think Backpack should do it though.

Graphik wrote:

They would've had Frank with Nany. That would've been one of the REAL co-ed rivalries & one of the pairs that justified the format in the first place. The fact that they couldn't get Frank, Jordan/Nia and either Zach/Trey with Marie should've told them to scrap it for another year or not do it at all.Kellyanne also should've been with Darrell b/c that fight with Jamie looks lame. Darrell/Kellyanne caused mayhem in the house.

KellyAnne was the reason but the mayhem was more Wes vs Darrell. I think they wanted a decent amount of bloodline representation so Jamie/KellyAnne trumps Darrell/KellyAnne here anyway. 

Exactly....Darrell talking about Kellyanne & her getting in the middle of him v.s. Wes, to which that itself randomly spawned Nick v.s. Kenny.

3 out of 15 possible choices isn't "decent representation" ****. The Duel had 5 (would've been 6 had Ev not caught mono) & Cutthroat had 7 + Camila. Come on now...

Graphik wrote:

They would've had Frank with Nany. That would've been one of the REAL co-ed rivalries & one of the pairs that justified the format in the first place. The fact that they couldn't get Frank, Jordan/Nia and either Zach/Trey with Marie should've told them to scrap it for another year or not do it at all.Kellyanne also should've been with Darrell b/c that fight with Jamie looks lame. Darrell/Kellyanne caused mayhem in the house.

I agree. Frank/Nany alone would've made the format worth a shit. Same thing with. Darrell and KellyAnne. Trey/Marie ******* Zach. Trey would be a better partner in the long run).

I wouldn't have minded Zach/Marie at all because it would've been WAR between those two **** Marie would not take any of Zach's shit.

I don't mind the Rivals 3 cast that much BUT I wanted to see Raphy/Nany.

KChallenge10 wrote:

Graphik wrote:They would've had Frank with Nany. That would've been one of the REAL co-ed rivalries & one of the pairs that justified the format in the first place. The fact that they couldn't get Frank, Jordan/Nia and either Zach/Trey with Marie should've told them to scrap it for another year or not do it at all.Kellyanne also should've been with Darrell b/c that fight with Jamie looks lame. Darrell/Kellyanne caused mayhem in the house.

KellyAnne was the reason but the mayhem was more Wes vs Darrell. I think they wanted a decent amount of bloodline representation so Jamie/KellyAnne trumps Darrell/KellyAnne here anyway. 

Exactly....Darrell talking about Kellyanne & her getting in the middle of him v.s. Wes, to which that itself randomly spawned Nick v.s. Kenny.3 out of 15 possible choices isn't "decent representation" ****. The Duel had 5 (would've been 6 had Ev not caught mono) & Cutthroat had 7 + Camila. Come on now...

Well without Jamie it would have only been two from bloodlines plus someone said Nicole originally didn't want to do it so it would have been just Vince. Hence why Jamie/KellyAnne trumps Darrell/KellyAnne. A lot of the bloodlines didn't fit the theme so they got what they could. If they really wanted Darrell they would have brought him back before or with another partner but they obviously don't or he's declining. 

I don't mind the Rivals 3 cast that much BUT I wanted to see Raphy/Nany.

Frank/Nany is the true definition of a coed rivals team, he still talks shit about her lol

Graphik wrote:

KChallenge10 wrote:

Graphik wrote:They would've had Frank with Nany. That would've been one of the REAL co-ed rivalries & one of the pairs that justified the format in the first place. The fact that they couldn't get Frank, Jordan/Nia and either Zach/Trey with Marie should've told them to scrap it for another year or not do it at all.Kellyanne also should've been with Darrell b/c that fight with Jamie looks lame. Darrell/Kellyanne caused mayhem in the house.

KellyAnne was the reason but the mayhem was more Wes vs Darrell. I think they wanted a decent amount of bloodline representation so Jamie/KellyAnne trumps Darrell/KellyAnne here anyway. 

Exactly....Darrell talking about Kellyanne & her getting in the middle of him v.s. Wes, to which that itself randomly spawned Nick v.s. Kenny.3 out of 15 possible choices isn't "decent representation" ****. The Duel had 5 (would've been 6 had Ev not caught mono) & Cutthroat had 7 + Camila. Come on now...

Well without Jamie it would have only been two from bloodlines plus someone said Nicole originally didn't want to do it so it would have been just Vince. Hence why Jamie/KellyAnne trumps Darrell/KellyAnne. A lot of the bloodlines didn't fit the theme so they got what they could. If they really wanted Darrell they would have brought him back before or with another partner but they obviously don't or he's declining. 

Raphy fit the theme perfectly; he was the main one arguing with Nany/Nicole. Candice also fit the theme from her allegedly getting into some type of argument with Cory.

Darrell isn't declining, we can see that from his twitter & when he retweeted Emilee while she was going through one of her fits. "They would've brought him back before"...since when is there a timeline on when somebody can be brought back on the show? Did Kellyanne not just come back after 6 years? Did Trishelle not come back after 8? Did Lacey not appear on a show 7 years after her season? Abe is also back after a few years....Mark took breaks in between his "retirements"....the list goes on & on.

Did the Rivals 3 cast get officially revealed? Because this is the generic thread.

Did the Rivals 3 cast get officially revealed? Because this is the generic thread.

yeah guys, look at the thread you are in before posting. 

Debut Album wrote:

Graphik wrote:They would've had Frank with Nany. That would've been one of the REAL co-ed rivalries & one of the pairs that justified the format in the first place. The fact that they couldn't get Frank, Jordan/Nia and either Zach/Trey with Marie should've told them to scrap it for another year or not do it at all.Kellyanne also should've been with Darrell b/c that fight with Jamie looks lame. Darrell/Kellyanne caused mayhem in the house.

I agree. Frank/Nany alone would've made the format worth a shit. Same thing with. Darrell and KellyAnne. Trey/Marie ******* Zach. Trey would be a better partner in the long run).

I wouldn't have minded Zach/Marie at all because it would've been WAR between those two **** Marie would not take any of Zach's shit.

Yeah but I really just don't want to see Zach again..ever. Besides Trey should get another shot IMO.

KChallenge10 wrote:

Graphik wrote:

KChallenge10 wrote:
Graphik wrote:They would've had Frank with Nany. That would've been one of the REAL co-ed rivalries & one of the pairs that justified the format in the first place. The fact that they couldn't get Frank, Jordan/Nia and either Zach/Trey with Marie should've told them to scrap it for another year or not do it at all.Kellyanne also should've been with Darrell b/c that fight with Jamie looks lame. Darrell/Kellyanne caused mayhem in the house.

KellyAnne was the reason but the mayhem was more Wes vs Darrell. I think they wanted a decent amount of bloodline representation so Jamie/KellyAnne trumps Darrell/KellyAnne here anyway. 

Exactly....Darrell talking about Kellyanne & her getting in the middle of him v.s. Wes, to which that itself randomly spawned Nick v.s. Kenny.3 out of 15 possible choices isn't "decent representation" ****. The Duel had 5 (would've been 6 had Ev not caught mono) & Cutthroat had 7 + Camila. Come on now...

Well without Jamie it would have only been two from bloodlines plus someone said Nicole originally didn't want to do it so it would have been just Vince. Hence why Jamie/KellyAnne trumps Darrell/KellyAnne. A lot of the bloodlines didn't fit the theme so they got what they could. If they really wanted Darrell they would have brought him back before or with another partner but they obviously don't or he's declining. 

Raphy fit the theme perfectly; he was the main one arguing with Nany/Nicole. Candice also fit the theme from her allegedly getting into some type of argument with Cory.Darrell isn't declining, we can see that from his twitter & when he retweeted Emilee while she was going through one of her fits. "They would've brought him back before"...since when is there a timeline on when somebody can be brought back on the show? Did Kellyanne not just come back after 6 years? Did Trishelle not come back after 8? Did Lacey not appear on a show 7 years after her season? Abe is also back after a few years....Mark took breaks in between his "retirements"....the list goes on & on.

I've learned to not rely as much on what people say on social media isn't Beth and others popping up sometimes saying they'd come back but still decline?

Also there is no timeline for when somebody can come back when production actually WANTS them to come back. They have been begging for KellyAnne for years and she finally said yes. They've been wanting Trishelle back too hence why she was brought on. Lacey was only brought on because Austin needed a second girl. The only reason Abe is back is because Cara was cheating on him and production saw drama bringing him on because he was originally an alternate plus it's not like Abe hasn't been gone as long as Darrell has. 

Graphik wrote:

KChallenge10 wrote:

Graphik wrote:
KChallenge10 wrote:
Graphik wrote:They would've had Frank with Nany. That would've been one of the REAL co-ed rivalries & one of the pairs that justified the format in the first place. The fact that they couldn't get Frank, Jordan/Nia and either Zach/Trey with Marie should've told them to scrap it for another year or not do it at all.Kellyanne also should've been with Darrell b/c that fight with Jamie looks lame. Darrell/Kellyanne caused mayhem in the house.

KellyAnne was the reason but the mayhem was more Wes vs Darrell. I think they wanted a decent amount of bloodline representation so Jamie/KellyAnne trumps Darrell/KellyAnne here anyway. 

Exactly....Darrell talking about Kellyanne & her getting in the middle of him v.s. Wes, to which that itself randomly spawned Nick v.s. Kenny.3 out of 15 possible choices isn't "decent representation" ****. The Duel had 5 (would've been 6 had Ev not caught mono) & Cutthroat had 7 + Camila. Come on now...

Well without Jamie it would have only been two from bloodlines plus someone said Nicole originally didn't want to do it so it would have been just Vince. Hence why Jamie/KellyAnne trumps Darrell/KellyAnne. A lot of the bloodlines didn't fit the theme so they got what they could. If they really wanted Darrell they would have brought him back before or with another partner but they obviously don't or he's declining. 

Raphy fit the theme perfectly; he was the main one arguing with Nany/Nicole. Candice also fit the theme from her allegedly getting into some type of argument with Cory.Darrell isn't declining, we can see that from his twitter & when he retweeted Emilee while she was going through one of her fits. "They would've brought him back before"...since when is there a timeline on when somebody can be brought back on the show? Did Kellyanne not just come back after 6 years? Did Trishelle not come back after 8? Did Lacey not appear on a show 7 years after her season? Abe is also back after a few years....Mark took breaks in between his "retirements"....the list goes on & on.

I've learned to not rely as much on what people say on social media isn't Beth and others popping up sometimes saying they'd come back but still decline?Also there is no timeline for when somebody can come back when production actually WANTS them to come back. They have been begging for KellyAnne for years and she finally said yes. They've been wanting Trishelle back too hence why she was brought on. Lacey was only brought on because Austin needed a second girl. The only reason Abe is back is because Cara was cheating on him and production saw drama bringing him on because he was originally an alternate plus it's not like Abe hasn't been gone as long as Darrell has. 

So explain Emilee, Isaac & Cohutta's reappearances on Free Agents.

A dude like Darrell wouldn't even waste the time of tweeting/retweeting Challenge stuff like that if he was actually declining & didn't want to do the show, especially since he barely uses social media as it is. Coral/Beth are mothers so one could see why they might decline, fathers don't have a real tough time being away from their children like a mother would & on top of that wouldn't put on an act of wanting to return knowing that they really don't....they would just move on.

Bananas (and I think Sarah Rice and TJ) will be on Robot Chicken tonight. Not completely familiar with the show so not too sure what their role will be 

Robot Chicken is hilarious lol

ChallengeFan00
Anonymous's picture

just rematches cutthroat and I'm so happy that tj called red team out for continuously throwing in Brandon that really ****** me off

KChallenge10 wrote:

Graphik wrote:

KChallenge10 wrote:
Graphik wrote:
KChallenge10 wrote:
Graphik wrote:They would've had Frank with Nany. That would've been one of the REAL co-ed rivalries & one of the pairs that justified the format in the first place. The fact that they couldn't get Frank, Jordan/Nia and either Zach/Trey with Marie should've told them to scrap it for another year or not do it at all.Kellyanne also should've been with Darrell b/c that fight with Jamie looks lame. Darrell/Kellyanne caused mayhem in the house.

KellyAnne was the reason but the mayhem was more Wes vs Darrell. I think they wanted a decent amount of bloodline representation so Jamie/KellyAnne trumps Darrell/KellyAnne here anyway. 

Exactly....Darrell talking about Kellyanne & her getting in the middle of him v.s. Wes, to which that itself randomly spawned Nick v.s. Kenny.3 out of 15 possible choices isn't "decent representation" ****. The Duel had 5 (would've been 6 had Ev not caught mono) & Cutthroat had 7 + Camila. Come on now...

Well without Jamie it would have only been two from bloodlines plus someone said Nicole originally didn't want to do it so it would have been just Vince. Hence why Jamie/KellyAnne trumps Darrell/KellyAnne. A lot of the bloodlines didn't fit the theme so they got what they could. If they really wanted Darrell they would have brought him back before or with another partner but they obviously don't or he's declining. 

Raphy fit the theme perfectly; he was the main one arguing with Nany/Nicole. Candice also fit the theme from her allegedly getting into some type of argument with Cory.Darrell isn't declining, we can see that from his twitter & when he retweeted Emilee while she was going through one of her fits. "They would've brought him back before"...since when is there a timeline on when somebody can be brought back on the show? Did Kellyanne not just come back after 6 years? Did Trishelle not come back after 8? Did Lacey not appear on a show 7 years after her season? Abe is also back after a few years....Mark took breaks in between his "retirements"....the list goes on & on.

I've learned to not rely as much on what people say on social media isn't Beth and others popping up sometimes saying they'd come back but still decline?Also there is no timeline for when somebody can come back when production actually WANTS them to come back. They have been begging for KellyAnne for years and she finally said yes. They've been wanting Trishelle back too hence why she was brought on. Lacey was only brought on because Austin needed a second girl. The only reason Abe is back is because Cara was cheating on him and production saw drama bringing him on because he was originally an alternate plus it's not like Abe hasn't been gone as long as Darrell has. 

So explain Emilee, Isaac & Cohutta's reappearances on Free Agents.A dude like Darrell wouldn't even waste the time of tweeting/retweeting Challenge stuff like that if he was actually declining & didn't want to do the show, especially since he barely uses social media as it is. Coral/Beth are mothers so one could see why they might decline, fathers don't have a real tough time being away from their children like a mother would & on top of that wouldn't put on an act of wanting to return knowing that they really don't....they would just move on.

Because peopel declined Free agents so they were force go a little deeper into the casting spots. Now day shockers like that would hardly happened , since they have 61 soon to be 81 from are you the possibilities that they they would call to fill the spots.

Did someone say that Candice should be with Cory in a Rival theme challenge? That fight was so petty, pointless and irrelevant that wasnt even shown in trailer or mentioned by anyone else. So no thank you, I personally dont need to see candice ever again.

Darrell doesnt make the cast, because production really doesnt care about him anymore. Why or why not? noI idea.

Beth/ Coral I really dont get them, they say they want to come back but stay declining. Production has called them and even offer them bigger paychecks but they stay saying no.

Pages