jenn was a good/great competitor on both cutthroat and rivals up until she had food poisoning. most people are too emotionally driven and filled with anger to admit this and will lie about her performance to make themselves feel better about her being a ***** to cara. she was performing on almost the same level as ev and better than laurel in the missions DESPITE having the worst "B" partner of the three: Mandi, Paula, Cara. i even remember people claiming some nonsense that jonna/jasmine should've gone further than jenn/mandi
i hate susie but she was probably the best female statistically on inferno 3. ev was exceptional on certain missions but susie was consistent throughout
this ev vs tonya discussion reminds me of their kelly anne vs jenna one
I don't recall too much, but didn't Susie have Cara to assist her in her wins though?
For real, not only that, she never delivered exceptionally well like Evelyn did in some challenges. Even in the last challenge before the final she was struggling and barely finished in like 12 minutes while Evelyn's time was around 4 minutes, comparable to some of the guys time, lol. That along with some other examples, it can be seen how Ev's performance overall was more immpresive than Susie.
But Susie did really well too. Her, Evelyn, Tonya and Paula all did good on Inferno 3.
******** already had the net climbing challenge in the bag with or without ev's high score. good guys only the wrap and roll mission because of susie
regardless consistently good quality, which is what susie was putting up, is better than ev's roller coaster performances that were all over the place and totally unpredictable. ev ranged from downright bad to exceptional while susie ranged from average to exceptional. ev was a volkswagen that was ready to exlpode at any time while susie was the toyota you could ALWAYS count on
susie was outperforming both her teammates and the bad ***** so even if we assume cara was going to beat susie in the missions if she had tried it wouldnt have changed the fact that susie was still putting up consistently higher scores than girls like ev
jenn was a good/great competitor on both cutthroat and rivals up until she had food poisoning. most people are too emotionally driven and filled with anger to admit this and will lie about her performance to make themselves feel better about her being a ***** to cara. she was performing on almost the same level as ev and better than laurel in the missions DESPITE having the worst "B" partner of the three: Mandi, Paula, Cara. i even remember people claiming some nonsense that jonna/jasmine should've gone further than jenn/mandi
i hate susie but she was probably the best female statistically on inferno 3. ev was exceptional on certain missions but susie was consistent throughout
this ev vs tonya discussion reminds me of their kelly anne vs jenna one
I don't recall too much, but didn't Susie have Cara to assist her in her wins though?
For real, not only that, she never delivered exceptionally well like Evelyn did in some challenges. Even in the last challenge before the final she was struggling and barely finished in like 12 minutes while Evelyn's time was around 4 minutes, comparable to some of the guys time, lol. That along with some other examples, it can be seen how Ev's performance overall was more immpresive than Susie.
But Susie did really well too. Her, Evelyn, Tonya and Paula all did good on Inferno 3.
******** already had the net climbing challenge in the bag with or without ev's high score. good guys only the wrap and roll mission because of susie
regardless consistently good quality, which is what susie was putting up, is better than ev's roller coaster performances that were all over the place and totally unpredictable. ev ranged from downright bad to exceptional while susie ranged from average to exceptional. ev was a volkswagen that was ready to exlpode at any time while susie was the toyota you could ALWAYS count on
Evelyn didn't have a "roller coaster" performance. She did constantly good and exceptionally well in alot of them as well. The times she outperformed Susie it was usually by a large margin. It's silly to call her "unpredictable" when all she got was praise by her teammates AND the good guys as well (Like Alton), and did great overall. Susie on the other hand never did anything "exceptional", she did consistently okay to good, never great or amazing.
Evelyn was the beast competitor that performed with most guys standards, while Susie was the good safe competitor who did consistantly good but never amazed. Looking at both overall times and performances, Evelyn clearly was the better performer and competitor on the females side in Inferno 3.
Susie is good but was never like physically amazing ... She knew how to play her cards though so even though I don't like her I will say she knows how to make up strategically what she lacks physically.
She could barely outperform paula with assistance.. She was not outperforming Ev on I3 lol.
dog day afternoon: ev #1 score while susie was average
giraffic park: susie was several seconds off from the #1 score of Paula while ev DQed
hook me: ev #1 score while susie was average/good
nothin but net: ev #1 score while susie was good
ev was exceptional 4x while susie was exceptional 3x. ev also DQed 3x while susie never had a single DQ or bad day. susie ranged from average-exceptional while ev had almost as many DQs as #1 days
dog day afternoon: ev #1 score while susie was average
giraffic park: susie was several seconds off from the #1 score of Paula while ev DQed
hook me: ev #1 score while susie was average/good
nothin but net: ev #1 score while susie was good
ev was exceptional 4x while susie was exceptional 3x. ev also DQed 3x while susie never had a single DQ or bad day. susie ranged from average-exceptional while ev had almost as many DQs as #1 days
Props to you for remembering all of this lol I forgot most of The Inferno 3. I really wish we got to see Susie vs. Tonya in the inferno.
Susie is good but was never like physically amazing ... She knew how to play her cards though so even though I don't like her I will say she knows how to make up strategically what she lacks physically.
She could barely outperform paula with assistance.. She was not outperforming Ev on I3 lol.
she isnt physically "amazing" but shes solid, reliable and was clearly more consistent than ev on inferno 3 who was basically an all or nothing ***** the entire season. nobody wants to deal with that mental instability up and down hormonal ****
and she did outperform paula. paula beat her once on the climbing wall by a decent margin and again by a mere several seconds in giraffic park. the rest of the time susie turned her into split paula soup by smashing her skull and scored times in the ground with minutes to spare. paula's ONE life shield was a victory over susie by a mere 5 seconds or less
dog day afternoon: ev #1 score while susie was average
giraffic park: susie was several seconds off from the #1 score of Paula while ev DQed
hook me: ev #1 score while susie was average/good
nothin but net: ev #1 score while susie was good
ev was exceptional 4x while susie was exceptional 3x. ev also DQed 3x while susie never had a single DQ or bad day. susie ranged from average-exceptional while ev had almost as many DQs as #1 days
A win doesn't necesarilly makes it "exceptional". Susie didn't have "exceptional" performances, she won them simply because she performed better then her teammates, but she didn't stand out or was exceptional, unlike how Evelyn was with her wins. Susie's supposed "exceptional" performances was nowhere near Evelyn's exceptional performances. You have to look how they won them. Evelyn killed the ladder face challenge. Dominated the Hook me challenge where Alton at his prime coudn't reel her in, that's call exceptional. And LOL Susie was NOT good at "Nothing but Net". She was struggling the whole time and nearly gave up, how is that "good"?. She also finished with around 12 minutes were Evelyn blew her out fo the water doing less than half of the time it took Susie to finish it with around 4 minutes, comparable to some guys time. Ev's DQ'd were also mostly paired, so not entirely her fault, were's Susie bad performances like "Nothin but Net" was simply cause she was not strong enough to do them. Huge difference. Based on the level of dominance of their wins and performance overall, including the final challenge, Evelyn was the superior athlete and performer.
susie was good during "nothing but net." she was second overall
exceptional is subjective. if you want to dock susie's winning performances as not exceptional then we should also refuse to use the term for ev's ladder race and dog day afternoon which leaves only the last two missions which are comparable to susie's super human endeavor during "wrap and roll." either way you look at it their wins are comparable but the only difference is that ev's wins came at the price of team anchoring DQs and a mentally unstable personality
you cant blame ev's DQs on her partners. "wrap and roll" was mostly the womens' effort and "steady as you go" used the same teammates that the winning times Tonya and Jenn used unless youre trying to say that the teammates were noticeably worse during ev's run than they were during tonya/jenns' turns. aneesa/tonya/jenn all did fine on "steady as you go" and they all shared the same "resource" of partners as ev
evelyn has great physical and athletic ability but her brain is not up to par. susie has decent/serviceable physical ability that is good ENOUGH but her brain and nerves are top notch. a competitor is just as much about mental toughness as it is about physical. evelyn **** BLOCKS her own physical ability/talent by getting flustered
I mean, I'll take Susie over Ev any day really. Ev, despite being alpha female, she's annoying and bat-shit crazy. Susie at least is consistant, although average, but sane.
susie was good during "nothing but net." she was second overall
exceptional is subjective. if you want to dock susie's winning performances as not exceptional then we should also refuse to use the term for ev's ladder race and dog day afternoon which leaves only the last two missions which are comparable to susie's super human endeavor during "wrap and roll." either way you look at it their wins are comparable but the only difference is that ev's wins came at the price of team anchoring DQs and a mentally unstable personality
you cant blame ev's DQs on her partners. "wrap and roll" was mostly the womens' effort and "steady as you go" used the same teammates that the winning times Tonya and Jenn used unless youre trying to say that the teammates were noticeably worse during ev's run than they were during tonya/jenns' turns. aneesa/tonya/jenn all did fine on "steady as you go" and they all shared the same "resource" of partners as ev
evelyn has great physical and athletic ability but her brain is not up to par. susie has decent/serviceable physical ability that is good ENOUGH but her brain and nerves are top notch. a competitor is just as much about mental toughness as it is about physical. evelyn **** BLOCKS her own physical ability/talent by getting flustered
1) No, Susie wasn't good on "Nothing but net". Just cause she was 2nd doesn't mean she was good. Look at her performance. She was actually pretty bad. They had a 15 minute time limit to finish the mission and she barely finished it with 12 minutes while having trouble doing so and struggling the whole way. She just didn't had the strenght to do good on that mission, unlike Ev.
2) I'm stating Susie's win as not 'exceptional" cause they just weren't. Especially compared to Evelyn's wins. I also wouldn't dismiss Evelyn's impressive "exceptional" performances in "Lader Race", "Dog Day" and "Nothing but Net" because she killed it. Especially in Dog Day where, again I will have to mention it, Alton in his prime couldn't reel Evelyn in and like he said "She's moving our boat!" lol. Also in "Dog Day" where her time was comparable to the guys time. So I don't think we should refuse to use that term on Evelyn cause her wins were extremelly impressive, unlike most of Susie's wins.
3) That's debatable. On "Wrap and Roll" it was a partners challenge where Ev and Derrick were the first to go. They DQ'd because BOTH of them weren't far enough with each other, a mistake that (just like Ev stated) most probably anyone who would've gotten 1st would have DQ, cause everyone else saw that mistake and made sure to not make it. And "Steady as they go" was shady. Even Jenn stated that Evelyn implied that she thought Jenn did bad on purpose just to make sure Ev didn't win the Life Shield. Ev fell because of her team not doing good on their part with the logs, thus making her fall over. Not really EV's fault at all.
I guess we will just disagree, which is ok. But my point stands that Evelyn was the superior performer, her wins were more immpresive, was the better overall athelete, performed better at the final, and all things considered was the top female on I3.
The Inferno/Gauntlet 3 is where a lot of Ev's rep comes from in the first place: people gassing her up to the heavens. Ev was NOT pulling that whole **** boat & I have no clue why Alton even said that.
dog day afternoon: ev #1 score while susie was average
giraffic park: susie was several seconds off from the #1 score of Paula while ev DQed
hook me: ev #1 score while susie was average/good
nothin but net: ev #1 score while susie was good
ev was exceptional 4x while susie was exceptional 3x. ev also DQed 3x while susie never had a single DQ or bad day. susie ranged from average-exceptional while ev had almost as many DQs as #1 days
the way you remember this is the same way i remember Rivals 2 and Free Agents. when it comes to defending Zach
Honestly, IMO Johnny B. will never be the true "champ". The fact that it took him as long as he did just to catch up to Darrell + how they've tried to rewrite history when it comes to that has never sat right with me & will never sit right with me until they finally let Darrell return (which at this point will probably never happen smh). How people act like Darrell hadn't had 4 wins YEARS before Johnny, yet this is never mentioned or talked about is some bullshit. Had the Ruins incident never happened, he would've had 5 years before Johnny & at anytime he comes back & wins, he will be tying Johnny's record after being gone for 6 years.
Sucks thread update with Ruthie, Melinda, Ibis, and Emily B all ranking. So far I only really disagree with Melinda and maybe Johanna, good list so far otherwise.
Honestly, IMO Johnny B. will never be the true "champ". The fact that it took him as long as he did just to catch up to Darrell + how they've tried to rewrite history when it comes to that has never sat right with me & will never sit right with me until they finally let Darrell return (which at this point will probably never happen smh). How people act like Darrell hadn't had 4 wins YEARS before Johnny, yet this is never mentioned or talked about is some bullshit. Had the Ruins incident never happened, he would've had 5 years before Johnny & at anytime he comes back & wins, he will be tying Johnny's record after being gone for 6 years.
I agree. I feel like Landon is the true champion to me. With Darrell being a close second.
But I think the reason Darrell having 4 wins isn't really mentioned is because he's not really on the shows anymore. If he were doing them now I think it would be mentioned.
But I do think that Darrell should return because he needs to redeem himself after how he went out on his last 2 appearences and on top of that go for that 5th win.
Sucks thread update with Ruthie, Melinda, Ibis, and Emily B all ranking. So far I only really disagree with Melinda and maybe Johanna, good list so far otherwise.
I don't think Ibis, Tori, Camilla, Melinda, Johanna and Casey should be on that list but everyone else is fine.(despite me hating most of them)
I agree. I feel like Landon is the true champion to me. With Darrell being a close second.
But I think the reason Darrell having 4 wins isn't really mentioned is because he's not really on the shows anymore. If he were doing them now I think it would be mentioned.
But I do think that Darrell should return because he needs to redeem himself after how he went out on his last 2 appearences and on top of that go for that 5th win.
Aww thanks Debut
Also totally agree.. Landon and Darrell are the best male contestants by farrrrrr
Honestly, IMO Johnny B. will never be the true "champ". The fact that it took him as long as he did just to catch up to Darrell + how they've tried to rewrite history when it comes to that has never sat right with me & will never sit right with me until they finally let Darrell return (which at this point will probably never happen smh). How people act like Darrell hadn't had 4 wins YEARS before Johnny, yet this is never mentioned or talked about is some bullshit. Had the Ruins incident never happened, he would've had 5 years before Johnny & at anytime he comes back & wins, he will be tying Johnny's record after being gone for 6 years.
I agree. I feel like Landon is the true champion to me. With Darrell being a close second.
But I think the reason Darrell having 4 wins isn't really mentioned is because he's not really on the shows anymore. If he were doing them now I think it would be mentioned.
But I do think that Darrell should return because he needs to redeem himself after how he went out on his last 2 appearences and on top of that go for that 5th win.
Well see the thing is, he's been wanting to return since Seasons 2. At this point they're purposely blacklisting him.
Sucks thread update with Ruthie, Melinda, Ibis, and Emily B all ranking. So far I only really disagree with Melinda and maybe Johanna, good list so far otherwise.
I don't think Ibis, Tori, Camilla, Melinda, Johanna and Casey should be on that list but everyone else is fine.(despite me hating most of them)
Wait Casey ranked? Lol, but yeah going based off the criteria in the OP, I'm fine with the rest.
Honestly, IMO Johnny B. will never be the true "champ". The fact that it took him as long as he did just to catch up to Darrell + how they've tried to rewrite history when it comes to that has never sat right with me & will never sit right with me until they finally let Darrell return (which at this point will probably never happen smh). How people act like Darrell hadn't had 4 wins YEARS before Johnny, yet this is never mentioned or talked about is some bullshit. Had the Ruins incident never happened, he would've had 5 years before Johnny & at anytime he comes back & wins, he will be tying Johnny's record after being gone for 6 years.
I agree. I feel like Landon is the true champion to me. With Darrell being a close second.
But I think the reason Darrell having 4 wins isn't really mentioned is because he's not really on the shows anymore. If he were doing them now I think it would be mentioned.
But I do think that Darrell should return because he needs to redeem himself after how he went out on his last 2 appearences and on top of that go for that 5th win.
Well see the thing is, he's been wanting to return since Seasons 2. At this point they're purposely blacklisting him.
Oh yeah. I don't disagree with that...Someone like Darrell should always be welcomed. Especially for competition since people are just so focused on it. Why not make the competition less predictable?
And when you think about it Darrell actually could do this show some good ratings wise because people defiently remember him from the old days and would bring some people back to the show. Don't get why they don't take advantage of that rather than just chase teenage fanbase that probably isn't even watching anyways.
Sucks thread update with Ruthie, Melinda, Ibis, and Emily B all ranking. So far I only really disagree with Melinda and maybe Johanna, good list so far otherwise.
I don't think Ibis, Tori, Camilla, Melinda, Johanna and Casey should be on that list but everyone else is fine.(despite me hating most of them)
Wait Casey ranked? Lol, but yeah going based off the criteria in the OP, I'm fine with the rest.
******** already had the net climbing challenge in the bag with or without ev's high score. good guys only the wrap and roll mission because of susie
regardless consistently good quality, which is what susie was putting up, is better than ev's roller coaster performances that were all over the place and totally unpredictable. ev ranged from downright bad to exceptional while susie ranged from average to exceptional. ev was a volkswagen that was ready to exlpode at any time while susie was the toyota you could ALWAYS count on
Yup! Queen Susie!
Evelyn didn't have a "roller coaster" performance. She did constantly good and exceptionally well in alot of them as well. The times she outperformed Susie it was usually by a large margin. It's silly to call her "unpredictable" when all she got was praise by her teammates AND the good guys as well (Like Alton), and did great overall. Susie on the other hand never did anything "exceptional", she did consistently okay to good, never great or amazing.
Evelyn was the beast competitor that performed with most guys standards, while Susie was the good safe competitor who did consistantly good but never amazed. Looking at both overall times and performances, Evelyn clearly was the better performer and competitor on the females side in Inferno 3.
Susie is good but was never like physically amazing ... She knew how to play her cards though so even though I don't like her I will say she knows how to make up strategically what she lacks physically.
She could barely outperform paula with assistance.. She was not outperforming Ev on I3 lol.
ladder face: ev #1 score while susie was good
wrap and roll: susie #1 score while ev DQed
reversible climbing wall: both mediocre/average
steady as you go: susie #1 score and ev DQed
dog day afternoon: ev #1 score while susie was average
giraffic park: susie was several seconds off from the #1 score of Paula while ev DQed
hook me: ev #1 score while susie was average/good
nothin but net: ev #1 score while susie was good
ev was exceptional 4x while susie was exceptional 3x. ev also DQed 3x while susie never had a single DQ or bad day. susie ranged from average-exceptional while ev had almost as many DQs as #1 days
Yass V123 coming in with the facts!
Props to you for remembering all of this lol I forgot most of The Inferno 3. I really wish we got to see Susie vs. Tonya in the inferno.
she isnt physically "amazing" but shes solid, reliable and was clearly more consistent than ev on inferno 3 who was basically an all or nothing ***** the entire season. nobody wants to deal with that mental instability up and down hormonal ****
and she did outperform paula. paula beat her once on the climbing wall by a decent margin and again by a mere several seconds in giraffic park. the rest of the time susie turned her into split paula soup by smashing her skull and scored times in the ground with minutes to spare. paula's ONE life shield was a victory over susie by a mere 5 seconds or less
A win doesn't necesarilly makes it "exceptional". Susie didn't have "exceptional" performances, she won them simply because she performed better then her teammates, but she didn't stand out or was exceptional, unlike how Evelyn was with her wins. Susie's supposed "exceptional" performances was nowhere near Evelyn's exceptional performances. You have to look how they won them. Evelyn killed the ladder face challenge. Dominated the Hook me challenge where Alton at his prime coudn't reel her in, that's call exceptional. And LOL Susie was NOT good at "Nothing but Net". She was struggling the whole time and nearly gave up, how is that "good"?. She also finished with around 12 minutes were Evelyn blew her out fo the water doing less than half of the time it took Susie to finish it with around 4 minutes, comparable to some guys time. Ev's DQ'd were also mostly paired, so not entirely her fault, were's Susie bad performances like "Nothin but Net" was simply cause she was not strong enough to do them. Huge difference. Based on the level of dominance of their wins and performance overall, including the final challenge, Evelyn was the superior athlete and performer.
Susie was under estimated? I always thought she was a ******... and I always thought everyone knew this
susie was good during "nothing but net." she was second overall
exceptional is subjective. if you want to dock susie's winning performances as not exceptional then we should also refuse to use the term for ev's ladder race and dog day afternoon which leaves only the last two missions which are comparable to susie's super human endeavor during "wrap and roll." either way you look at it their wins are comparable but the only difference is that ev's wins came at the price of team anchoring DQs and a mentally unstable personality
you cant blame ev's DQs on her partners. "wrap and roll" was mostly the womens' effort and "steady as you go" used the same teammates that the winning times Tonya and Jenn used unless youre trying to say that the teammates were noticeably worse during ev's run than they were during tonya/jenns' turns. aneesa/tonya/jenn all did fine on "steady as you go" and they all shared the same "resource" of partners as ev
evelyn has great physical and athletic ability but her brain is not up to par. susie has decent/serviceable physical ability that is good ENOUGH but her brain and nerves are top notch. a competitor is just as much about mental toughness as it is about physical. evelyn **** BLOCKS her own physical ability/talent by getting flustered
I mean, I'll take Susie over Ev any day really. Ev, despite being alpha female, she's annoying and bat-shit crazy. Susie at least is consistant, although average, but sane.
1) No, Susie wasn't good on "Nothing but net". Just cause she was 2nd doesn't mean she was good. Look at her performance. She was actually pretty bad. They had a 15 minute time limit to finish the mission and she barely finished it with 12 minutes while having trouble doing so and struggling the whole way. She just didn't had the strenght to do good on that mission, unlike Ev.
2) I'm stating Susie's win as not 'exceptional" cause they just weren't. Especially compared to Evelyn's wins. I also wouldn't dismiss Evelyn's impressive "exceptional" performances in "Lader Race", "Dog Day" and "Nothing but Net" because she killed it. Especially in Dog Day where, again I will have to mention it, Alton in his prime couldn't reel Evelyn in and like he said "She's moving our boat!" lol. Also in "Dog Day" where her time was comparable to the guys time. So I don't think we should refuse to use that term on Evelyn cause her wins were extremelly impressive, unlike most of Susie's wins.
3) That's debatable. On "Wrap and Roll" it was a partners challenge where Ev and Derrick were the first to go. They DQ'd because BOTH of them weren't far enough with each other, a mistake that (just like Ev stated) most probably anyone who would've gotten 1st would have DQ, cause everyone else saw that mistake and made sure to not make it. And "Steady as they go" was shady. Even Jenn stated that Evelyn implied that she thought Jenn did bad on purpose just to make sure Ev didn't win the Life Shield. Ev fell because of her team not doing good on their part with the logs, thus making her fall over. Not really EV's fault at all.
I guess we will just disagree, which is ok. But my point stands that Evelyn was the superior performer, her wins were more immpresive, was the better overall athelete, performed better at the final, and all things considered was the top female on I3.
The Inferno/Gauntlet 3 is where a lot of Ev's rep comes from in the first place: people gassing her up to the heavens. Ev was NOT pulling that whole **** boat & I have no clue why Alton even said that.
the way you remember this is the same way i remember Rivals 2 and Free Agents. when it comes to defending Zach
Honestly, IMO Johnny B. will never be the true "champ". The fact that it took him as long as he did just to catch up to Darrell + how they've tried to rewrite history when it comes to that has never sat right with me & will never sit right with me until they finally let Darrell return (which at this point will probably never happen smh). How people act like Darrell hadn't had 4 wins YEARS before Johnny, yet this is never mentioned or talked about is some bullshit. Had the Ruins incident never happened, he would've had 5 years before Johnny & at anytime he comes back & wins, he will be tying Johnny's record after being gone for 6 years.
Sucks thread update with Ruthie, Melinda, Ibis, and Emily B all ranking. So far I only really disagree with Melinda and maybe Johanna, good list so far otherwise.
I agree. I feel like Landon is the true champion to me. With Darrell being a close second.
But I think the reason Darrell having 4 wins isn't really mentioned is because he's not really on the shows anymore. If he were doing them now I think it would be mentioned.
But I do think that Darrell should return because he needs to redeem himself after how he went out on his last 2 appearences and on top of that go for that 5th win.
I don't think Ibis, Tori, Camilla, Melinda, Johanna and Casey should be on that list but everyone else is fine.(despite me hating most of them)
Aww thanks Debut
Also totally agree.. Landon and Darrell are the best male contestants by farrrrrr
Well see the thing is, he's been wanting to return since Seasons 2. At this point they're purposely blacklisting him.
Wait Casey ranked? Lol, but yeah going based off the criteria in the OP, I'm fine with the rest.
Oh yeah. I don't disagree with that...Someone like Darrell should always be welcomed. Especially for competition since people are just so focused on it. Why not make the competition less predictable?
And when you think about it Darrell actually could do this show some good ratings wise because people defiently remember him from the old days and would bring some people back to the show. Don't get why they don't take advantage of that rather than just chase teenage fanbase that probably isn't even watching anyways.
Yeah she was unfortunatley.
So in the spirit of Bloodlines premiring tonight: Who is everyone rooting for to win?
For me it's Tony/Shane,Cory/Mitch, Thomas/Stephen, Nany/Nicole and Cohutta/Jill.
Im rooting for cara maria now and forever. No matter the rumors of what she does this season i dont care i love her
Im rooting for cara maria now and forever. No matter the rumors of what she does this season i dont care i love her
Cory/Mitch, Jill (never been a huge Cohutta fan), Rianna/Aneesa, KellyAnne, and Larissa.
B you need to get with the program Cara all day every day .
Rooting for my girls KellyAnne, Cara Maria, and Aneesa. Shall be fun.
Pages