Did Trishelle tell MJ before to vote out CT? I don't remember that. So why did MJ seemed surprised that Trishelle didn't vote to end the game at the final 3?
MJ's feeling was that they should have ended the game. CT and Trishelle both voted to vote again. CT knew that MJ was a faithful but voted again to split the money with only him and Trishelle. Trishelle I also think knew CT was a faithful but wanted to backstab him so her and MJ would win. But in the end MJ ended up getting banished because CT and Trishelle were smart enough to save themselves.
Trishelle claims she told MJ after the last roundtable that she knew MJ was a faithful and was going to stick with her. I am not sure what MJ has said about it, but Trishelle's votes to banish Kate and then CT are evidence the conversation likely happened.
I can see accusations that CT was being greedy being accurate, but people seem to group he and Trishelle on that when their motivations seemed different. (And to be clear, I don't care if CT was being greedy lol.) To your point, Trishelle may have been wanting to backstab CT and then ultimately saved herself. If that's true, that still means Trishelle didn't intentionally screw MJ over.
I don't think I am as clueless as Quentin, MJ or Dolores, but that's clearly effective to get to the end. If someone can consciously play that way, good for them!
I'd listen a lot. I'd make a point to speak a bit at most roundtables, but not a lot. You'd want ideas to seem like other people's ideas, but without yourself just being a sheep. If I had felt sure someone was a traitor but we were close, I would keep them around. but try not to be too obvious about it. You also sort of want to be a shield for the traitors, but without being so suspicious you get banished.
I think a lot of players oversimplify the way they talk about being a faithful. You hear a lot of players say it's easier and that there's no reason to lie if you're a faithful. Faithfuls always have to worry about being murdered, and there are definitely reasons to lie as a faithful. There are lot of things to balance as a faithful, too.
I'm on UK3 episode 7. If the traitors had put one of their names in the 4 up for murder and then lost, what would have happened? No murder? In that situation the faithfuls would have known who the others up for murder were, so if no murder happened wouldn't it have been obvious the person was a traitor? Or was there another plan?
I was sad to see Leon stay and Fozia go as Leon has been so wrong all game, whereas Fozia had shown herself to be sharp.
Anna is funny because she's right about Minah, but it had nothing to do with the damn drink. That was also so easily proven wrong since no one else was handed a drink.
What I notice about the UK vs the US is the UK people think a lot about "Whose personality would be a traitor?" That thinking leads them to banish a lot of non-traitors. The UK players also constantly apologize for their votes lol.
You don't have to specify that you're loud about one of your beliefs because you're loud and obnoxious about every thought that pops into your head.
Trishelle claims she told MJ after the last roundtable that she knew MJ was a faithful and was going to stick with her. I am not sure what MJ has said about it, but Trishelle's votes to banish Kate and then CT are evidence the conversation likely happened.
I can see accusations that CT was being greedy being accurate, but people seem to group he and Trishelle on that when their motivations seemed different. (And to be clear, I don't care if CT was being greedy lol.) To your point, Trishelle may have been wanting to backstab CT and then ultimately saved herself. If that's true, that still means Trishelle didn't intentionally screw MJ over.
I don't think I am as clueless as Quentin, MJ or Dolores, but that's clearly effective to get to the end. If someone can consciously play that way, good for them!
I'd listen a lot. I'd make a point to speak a bit at most roundtables, but not a lot. You'd want ideas to seem like other people's ideas, but without yourself just being a sheep. If I had felt sure someone was a traitor but we were close, I would keep them around. but try not to be too obvious about it. You also sort of want to be a shield for the traitors, but without being so suspicious you get banished.
I think a lot of players oversimplify the way they talk about being a faithful. You hear a lot of players say it's easier and that there's no reason to lie if you're a faithful. Faithfuls always have to worry about being murdered, and there are definitely reasons to lie as a faithful. There are lot of things to balance as a faithful, too.
IMG_4567.jpeg
I'm on UK3 episode 7. If the traitors had put one of their names in the 4 up for murder and then lost, what would have happened? No murder? In that situation the faithfuls would have known who the others up for murder were, so if no murder happened wouldn't it have been obvious the person was a traitor? Or was there another plan?
I was sad to see Leon stay and Fozia go as Leon has been so wrong all game, whereas Fozia had shown herself to be sharp.
Anna is funny because she's right about Minah, but it had nothing to do with the damn drink. That was also so easily proven wrong since no one else was handed a drink.
What I notice about the UK vs the US is the UK people think a lot about "Whose personality would be a traitor?" That thinking leads them to banish a lot of non-traitors. The UK players also constantly apologize for their votes lol.
Both Meghan and Ivar are boring (but I'm sure lovely) people that don't need to be on tv.
Pages