I'm trying to make sense of Danielle wanting to recruit Britney. If they need a woman traitor banished and bring in Britney, then that either means Britney is a sacrificial lamb (which could work - but is Danielle really willing to do that?) or Britney and Danielle target Carolyn (which they could do regardless actually).
I didn't ask for every. I asked for one. Lol. The way you'll dedicate page after of page of paragraphs going back and forth with KVM but can't give me one thing that Dunglores has done. Ctfu.
She made a funny joke in episode 3 about the show being housewives hunters. She made a joke about Tom at the breakfast scene this episode. There you go. That's two. One more than Sam ever did.
I'm trying to make sense of Danielle wanting to recruit Britney. If they need a woman traitor banished and bring in Britney, then that either means Britney is a sacrificial lamb (which could work - but is Danielle really willing to do that?) or Britney and Danielle target Carolyn (which they could do regardless actually).
King Tom would be great because they all treat Tom like Carolyn and dismiss him as being too dumb to be a traitor. But because everyone thinks a woman is likely a traitor they have to recruit a woman to basically sacrifice at the next round table.
I like Ciara, wouldn't mind her seeing on something else. As far as who's boring it's Ivar, Sam & Dolores, Sam had a good episode because all the big personalities are gone and someone has to get airtime.
Recruiting at this point is ridiculous, like it's final 9 and we're potentially going to have 3 traitors? If they survive one banishment its 3 out of 7 which would just be embarrassing if they lost at that point. Don't see any reason to give them that option right now
The biggest problem with this show is that they have a set number of episodes, which means they can never let it get down to one traitor before the finale.
I'm trying to make sense of Danielle wanting to recruit Britney. If they need a woman traitor banished and bring in Britney, then that either means Britney is a sacrificial lamb (which could work - but is Danielle really willing to do that?) or Britney and Danielle target Carolyn (which they could do regardless actually).
But because everyone thinks a woman is likely a traitor they have to recruit a woman to basically sacrifice at the next round table.
Right, but does that mean Danielle is wanting to sacrifice Britney? She seems hell bent on recruiting Britney but also does seem close with her. If she truly wants to work with Britney, it seems like recruiting Gabby or someone to then sacrifice them would make more sense. If Danielle is not willing to sacrifice Britney, then by default it means she wants to get rid of Carolyn if Britney is recruited.
Recruiting at this point is ridiculous, like it's final 9 and we're potentially going to have 3 traitors? If they survive one banishment its 3 out of 7 which would just be embarrassing if they lost at that point. Don't see any reason to give them that option right now
Didn't they have 3 this late in season 1? Arie was recruited pretty late, and then Cirie played him like a fiddle!
The biggest problem with this show is that they have a set number of episodes, which means they can never let it get down to one traitor before the finale.
Yeah but if they were to get down to 1, they could then have that person recruit - which is what happened with Phaedra last year. I wish they had done that here; just keep the 2 women, and then have a recruitment if one of them is banished.
It's also interesting to me the faithfuls all assume there are 2 women traitors (which is of course correct). In theory TPTB could have easily started with 2 traitors and then when Rob came in he made it 3 total. I would think Danielle and Carolyn would want to subtly suggest that possibility.
I have to imagine whoever gets recruited will be used to get rid of the other one, if it's gabby then they will team up against Danielle, if Brittany then against Carolyn. Brittany or gabby will likely vote the way they are told regardless but it's more likely if they know for a fact they person they are voting for is a traitor.
I'm not going to lie, when Tom said the whole "women are likely to be cheaters", I thought for a second all of the women were going to ban together and voted him off. Kind of wished that actually happened. Would have been pretty iconic.
I'm not going to lie, when Tom said the whole "women are likely to be cheaters", I thought for a second all of the women were going to ban together and voted him off. Kind of wished that actually happened. Would have been pretty iconic.
why do they keep bringing kate back? now thats what u call a production plant, that lady did nothing on her return last season and was a pitiful strategist.
Yeah Kate was great on season 1, but I'm not a fan of her returns. I don't like anyone coming in mid-season like she did last season, and depending on what her role is she won't be entertaining in this return (nor will Parvati, whom I love, but in general someone hosting a challenge or whatever is just pointless).
I'm hoping they're just returning for a daily challenge and not actually entering the game. I didn't watch S1 so I was happy to see Kate in S2, but I hate late entries in general.
Is there a thread around here for spoilers for this show? Alan said something in an interview that seems to contain a spoiler. Can I just post it and put SPOILERS at the top of the post?
Is there a thread around here for spoilers for this show? Alan said something in an interview that seems to contain a spoiler. Can I just post it and put SPOILERS at the top of the post?
if its what Ive seen, I think it would be fine if you wrote spoiler first but I cant speak for everyone. It seems to suggest there may be a brutual ending
Actually nvm I did some digging and Alan did more than hint at a brutual ending and it seems to be specifically next weeks episode and I surely hope the fan theories are wrong
I'm trying to make sense of Danielle wanting to recruit Britney. If they need a woman traitor banished and bring in Britney, then that either means Britney is a sacrificial lamb (which could work - but is Danielle really willing to do that?) or Britney and Danielle target Carolyn (which they could do regardless actually).
lololol
King Tom would be great because they all treat Tom like Carolyn and dismiss him as being too dumb to be a traitor. But because everyone thinks a woman is likely a traitor they have to recruit a woman to basically sacrifice at the next round table.
I like Ciara, wouldn't mind her seeing on something else. As far as who's boring it's Ivar, Sam & Dolores, Sam had a good episode because all the big personalities are gone and someone has to get airtime.
Recruiting at this point is ridiculous, like it's final 9 and we're potentially going to have 3 traitors? If they survive one banishment its 3 out of 7 which would just be embarrassing if they lost at that point. Don't see any reason to give them that option right now
Yeah. I hate the recruitment this late. Absolutely ridiculous.
The biggest problem with this show is that they have a set number of episodes, which means they can never let it get down to one traitor before the finale.
Right, but does that mean Danielle is wanting to sacrifice Britney? She seems hell bent on recruiting Britney but also does seem close with her. If she truly wants to work with Britney, it seems like recruiting Gabby or someone to then sacrifice them would make more sense. If Danielle is not willing to sacrifice Britney, then by default it means she wants to get rid of Carolyn if Britney is recruited.
Didn't they have 3 this late in season 1? Arie was recruited pretty late, and then Cirie played him like a fiddle!
Yeah but if they were to get down to 1, they could then have that person recruit - which is what happened with Phaedra last year. I wish they had done that here; just keep the 2 women, and then have a recruitment if one of them is banished.
It's also interesting to me the faithfuls all assume there are 2 women traitors (which is of course correct). In theory TPTB could have easily started with 2 traitors and then when Rob came in he made it 3 total. I would think Danielle and Carolyn would want to subtly suggest that possibility.
I have to imagine whoever gets recruited will be used to get rid of the other one, if it's gabby then they will team up against Danielle, if Brittany then against Carolyn. Brittany or gabby will likely vote the way they are told regardless but it's more likely if they know for a fact they person they are voting for is a traitor.
IMG_3098.jpeg
IMG_2397.jpeg
I'm not going to lie, when Tom said the whole "women are likely to be cheaters", I thought for a second all of the women were going to ban together and voted him off. Kind of wished that actually happened. Would have been pretty iconic.
I was really hoping for this too
Bold since he cheated and caused alot of drama.
why do they keep bringing kate back? now thats what u call a production plant, that lady did nothing on her return last season and was a pitiful strategist.
Kate was a legend on her first season.
oh i aint watch it. makes sense i guess.
Ntm on Kate! That's my Below Deck rep! Kate is a star! Now Parvati...
Yeah Kate was great on season 1, but I'm not a fan of her returns. I don't like anyone coming in mid-season like she did last season, and depending on what her role is she won't be entertaining in this return (nor will Parvati, whom I love, but in general someone hosting a challenge or whatever is just pointless).
I'm hoping they're just returning for a daily challenge and not actually entering the game. I didn't watch S1 so I was happy to see Kate in S2, but I hate late entries in general.
Season1 Kate was fuin. S2 Kate was forced and absurd. If you hate this show so much why come back? Her gig got tired fast.
They should've had Shitrie representin S1 so we had a 2/5 of the Black Widow Alliance in our screens
Is there a thread around here for spoilers for this show? Alan said something in an interview that seems to contain a spoiler. Can I just post it and put SPOILERS at the top of the post?
I did feel Kate tried too hard season 2 whereas season 1 it felt natural and fun. Still loved her.
https://youtu.be/iAhQQry61t4?si=zm7MCcpezZ7EKXH5
if its what Ive seen, I think it would be fine if you wrote spoiler first but I cant speak for everyone. It seems to suggest there may be a brutual ending
I don't want to see spoilers kindly :). Maybe someone can create a spoiled thread
Actually nvm I did some digging and Alan did more than hint at a brutual ending and it seems to be specifically next weeks episode and I surely hope the fan theories are wrong
:(
Pages