Because people in spoiler threads accidently spoil outcomes without realizing or try and act like theyre good at predictions when really they are just using their spoilers. So it's easy to gather results from their posts.
Omg. The Survivor subreddit is THE WORST with this. I remember someone said they "had a feeling" that Bruce would get evacuated. I'm a couple months sober from that hellhole <3
I did a quick scroll through the spoilers thread while only looking at the screen names and I saw tvcoffee and Fiona in there lol.
and what about it?
Because people in spoiler threads accidently spoil outcomes without realizing or try and act like theyre good at predictions when really they are just using their spoilers. So it's easy to gather results from their posts.
But there aren't any actual spoilers about how this show is going. I mean, we have the roundtable pic that the show gave us last week (which is a a minor spoiler), and now Sandra possibly spoiled something with a picture but I don't know if it's definitive (it also only spoils like 2 things). There aren't actual spoilers for who wins and such, so anything people are predicting is pretty much just speculation/prediction.
Thank you! Yall confusing me. You said to basically take any speculation from interviews over there, and thats what happened. I havent seen any definitive spoilers here, twitter, or reddit. Trust me, Ive looked to try to confirm my only prediction, which is solely based on the edit so far. I know nothing lol
Wrong spoilers are out there cause I don't see how all yall correctly guessed parv and Dan being traitors and no it's not a given that they would be because the cast is stacked and anyone was relevant enough to be a traitor. And as far as I'm concerned it's randomized. We only had one season to go off of which was only half celebrities.
Umm I gotta disagree Timster. I knew Cire would be a Traitor season 1 with no spoilers and guessed Dan would be here too. Parv was an educated guess but not a lock like Cirie and Dan were.
Once the cast was known, from jump people were saying Dan, Parvarti, and Sandra would be traitors because of their game history. If there were actual spoilers, Phaedras name wouldve been in the mix.
sometimes its really as simple as people taking educated guesses lol
Wait why are we talking about spoilers of who would be traitors? The show tells us right away who the traitors are, and we've been past that for a month now anyway and all know who the current traitors are. I am truly confused lol.
My question regarding spoilers has to do with things like the shot of the roundtable in the next episode; does that go here since the show showed us, or is that a spoiler because you have to look for it and figure it out?
Wrong spoilers are out there cause I don't see how all yall correctly guessed parv and Dan being traitors and no it's not a given that they would be because the cast is stacked and anyone was relevant enough to be a traitor. And as far as I'm concerned it's randomized. We only had one season to go off of which was only half celebrities.
Wrong spoilers are out there cause I don't see how all yall correctly guessed parv and Dan being traitors and no it's not a given that they would be because the cast is stacked and anyone was relevant enough to be a traitor. And as far as I'm concerned it's randomized. We only had one season to go off of which was only half celebrities.
They need at least 1-2 traitors who are gamers and can think of the proper strategies and more so be willing to lie/manipulate/'kill.' We saw in the first season (and in other editions) that some people struggle with that (hell, Cody was a gamer and still did). So, one it's logical that they are going to put a Dan and/or Parvati in as a traitor because they know they are capable of doing it. It's a risk to put in a group of people where you have no idea if they can do what it takes. Also, we know some people (including Dan) campaigned to be a traitor; it's why they go on the show. So, I do think it's very logical to assume that among Dan, Parvati, Sandra, CT, and Bananas that 1-2 of them would be a traitor.
I mean, imagine this season with some combination of John, Bergie, Sheree, Kevin, and MJ as traitors. Come on now.
if this was next seasons cast, they need to just make the most random choices like 3 housewives or like bergie, john, and larsa. these people are too smart now
I don't necessarily disagree for this US2 season and all these reality tv ppl, but I think we underestimate non gamers and small players. Humans can be very ruthless and cutthroat regardless if big or small players. Alex and Murielle on AUS2 were this way and I'm betting one or two of the names you just mentioned could be the exact same. And think we see these ones as faithful so they can really act whatever way they want but I wonder if they'd polish their gameplay up to play different as a traitor. I mean that Christian from US1 he seemed to tone down his behavior albeit he was still an idiot but I did notice a change.
In my personal opinion there is no strategy to murdering. Only thing you can do to draw suspicion to yourself is to murder someone that called you out at the round table. Besides that it's all completely pointless to me when the faithful start speculating why someone was murdered or even saying it was a waste murder someone. It makes no sense at all to me.
Y'all say bananas is unbearable but I'm watching Johnny Fairplay recap with Rachel and Sandra cannot stop bringing up House of villains as comparison. that is such a loser and will forever be proud of being a part of that boring show because he gets calls from nowhere else
if this was next seasons cast, they need to just make the most random choices like 3 housewives or like bergie, john, and larsa. these people are too smart now
I agree, they'll definitely need to switch some things up.
In my personal opinion there is no strategy to murdering. Only thing you can do to draw suspicion to yourself is to murder someone that called you out at the round table. Besides that it's all completely pointless to me when the faithful start speculating why someone was murdered or even saying it was a waste murder someone. It makes no sense at all to me.
There is definitely a strategy to murdering. We are even shown the traitors discussing why they murder people. Traitors certainly want to murder some of the leaders in the house because that makes it easier for the traitors to take advantage of the others. Other times a really random murder can make people go "Wtf?" Or like with Phaedra murdering Tamra, sometimes you want to murder an ally because then people won't think you are a traitor.
And some murders are just because they know the person will never get banished, so they take them out while they can. These tend to be the people that are well liked by the house that are known to be faithfuls.
And some murders are just because they know the person will never get banished, so they take them out while they can. These tend to be the people that are well liked by the house that are known to be faithfuls.
Yup, that has happened before.
Phaedra is playing a great game, but she also has the advantage of people not really looking at the Housewives (getting back to Parvati trying to put some heat on them two episodes ago). The reality is a lot of people were assuming big names in the competition world were going to be traitors, which immediately helps people like Phaedra. That is one thing that would make it interesting if next season they made all of the traitors people who didn't come from competition reality. That would really throw people off.
I just watched an interview with Janelle and Bergie, and this is where you see what kinds of advantages the people who have done competition reality and such have. The host asked Bergie about being the last one untied in the first challenge, and he said he had a really experienced man tying the knots or something. The host noted Janelle was untied first, and Janelle said that's because she kept telling her man he was tying it too tight and she couldn't feel her hands. Smart. Janelle also said (which someone else has already noted in this thread) that she could tell who the traitors were because of where the cameras would go and that if you were in a group and there were no cameras, likely none of them is a traitor. These are things that people who haven't done reality competition before wouldn't think of (though some of that is also just that Janelle is smart).
Omg. The Survivor subreddit is THE WORST with this. I remember someone said they "had a feeling" that Bruce would get evacuated. I'm a couple months sober from that hellhole <3
But there aren't any actual spoilers about how this show is going. I mean, we have the roundtable pic that the show gave us last week (which is a a minor spoiler), and now Sandra possibly spoiled something with a picture but I don't know if it's definitive (it also only spoils like 2 things). There aren't actual spoilers for who wins and such, so anything people are predicting is pretty much just speculation/prediction.
Thank you! Yall confusing me. You said to basically take any speculation from interviews over there, and thats what happened. I havent seen any definitive spoilers here, twitter, or reddit. Trust me, Ive looked to try to confirm my only prediction, which is solely based on the edit so far. I know nothing lol
SPOILER: The winner is Deontay Wilder and the politican
Wrong spoilers are out there cause I don't see how all yall correctly guessed parv and Dan being traitors and no it's not a given that they would be because the cast is stacked and anyone was relevant enough to be a traitor. And as far as I'm concerned it's randomized. We only had one season to go off of which was only half celebrities.
Umm I gotta disagree Timster. I knew Cire would be a Traitor season 1 with no spoilers and guessed Dan would be here too. Parv was an educated guess but not a lock like Cirie and Dan were.
Once the cast was known, from jump people were saying Dan, Parvarti, and Sandra would be traitors because of their game history. If there were actual spoilers, Phaedras name wouldve been in the mix.
sometimes its really as simple as people taking educated guesses lol
Wait why are we talking about spoilers of who would be traitors? The show tells us right away who the traitors are, and we've been past that for a month now anyway and all know who the current traitors are. I am truly confused lol.
My question regarding spoilers has to do with things like the shot of the roundtable in the next episode; does that go here since the show showed us, or is that a spoiler because you have to look for it and figure it out?
lol I wouldn't have been mad
this is so funny, I've been avoiding that other thread
I agree
And that other thread was all we had for a while until this one, just in defense of ppl hoping around
The only reason not to think Dan is a traitor from day 1 is that there's no doubt he's likely going to be picked as one.
They need at least 1-2 traitors who are gamers and can think of the proper strategies and more so be willing to lie/manipulate/'kill.' We saw in the first season (and in other editions) that some people struggle with that (hell, Cody was a gamer and still did). So, one it's logical that they are going to put a Dan and/or Parvati in as a traitor because they know they are capable of doing it. It's a risk to put in a group of people where you have no idea if they can do what it takes. Also, we know some people (including Dan) campaigned to be a traitor; it's why they go on the show. So, I do think it's very logical to assume that among Dan, Parvati, Sandra, CT, and Bananas that 1-2 of them would be a traitor.
I mean, imagine this season with some combination of John, Bergie, Sheree, Kevin, and MJ as traitors. Come on now.
if this was next seasons cast, they need to just make the most random choices like 3 housewives or like bergie, john, and larsa. these people are too smart now
I don't necessarily disagree for this US2 season and all these reality tv ppl, but I think we underestimate non gamers and small players. Humans can be very ruthless and cutthroat regardless if big or small players. Alex and Murielle on AUS2 were this way and I'm betting one or two of the names you just mentioned could be the exact same. And think we see these ones as faithful so they can really act whatever way they want but I wonder if they'd polish their gameplay up to play different as a traitor. I mean that Christian from US1 he seemed to tone down his behavior albeit he was still an idiot but I did notice a change.
In my personal opinion there is no strategy to murdering. Only thing you can do to draw suspicion to yourself is to murder someone that called you out at the round table. Besides that it's all completely pointless to me when the faithful start speculating why someone was murdered or even saying it was a waste murder someone. It makes no sense at all to me.
Y'all say bananas is unbearable but I'm watching Johnny Fairplay recap with Rachel and Sandra cannot stop bringing up House of villains as comparison. that is such a loser and will forever be proud of being a part of that boring show because he gets calls from nowhere else
I agree, they'll definitely need to switch some things up.
There is definitely a strategy to murdering. We are even shown the traitors discussing why they murder people. Traitors certainly want to murder some of the leaders in the house because that makes it easier for the traitors to take advantage of the others. Other times a really random murder can make people go "Wtf?" Or like with Phaedra murdering Tamra, sometimes you want to murder an ally because then people won't think you are a traitor.
And some murders are just because they know the person will never get banished, so they take them out while they can. These tend to be the people that are well liked by the house that are known to be faithfuls.
Yup, that has happened before.
Phaedra is playing a great game, but she also has the advantage of people not really looking at the Housewives (getting back to Parvati trying to put some heat on them two episodes ago). The reality is a lot of people were assuming big names in the competition world were going to be traitors, which immediately helps people like Phaedra. That is one thing that would make it interesting if next season they made all of the traitors people who didn't come from competition reality. That would really throw people off.
I just watched an interview with Janelle and Bergie, and this is where you see what kinds of advantages the people who have done competition reality and such have. The host asked Bergie about being the last one untied in the first challenge, and he said he had a really experienced man tying the knots or something. The host noted Janelle was untied first, and Janelle said that's because she kept telling her man he was tying it too tight and she couldn't feel her hands. Smart. Janelle also said (which someone else has already noted in this thread) that she could tell who the traitors were because of where the cameras would go and that if you were in a group and there were no cameras, likely none of them is a traitor. These are things that people who haven't done reality competition before wouldn't think of (though some of that is also just that Janelle is smart).
7 hours or less! Will y'all be snacking on anything specific when you watch?
Shrimp and chicken Parmesan
Goldfish
Yum!! Fried or grilled?
I wonder what color headband Parv will wear tonight to trigger that one person?
Happy Parvati day!
Omg I lived for that unhinged rant. I hope we get a sequel to that ...even though the sequel normally doesn't outdo the original
Pages