You should always take out the people that will give you the most trouble in a final. It was a boss move from Cory.
I'm sitting here trying to think of one reason why keeping Darrell over Tony was a good idea and I have nothing lol Cory can beat Tony in a final, he def can't beat Darrell. Darrell didn't come back so no harm no foul. I love Darrell and wanted him there but that was def the best move possible to take a shot of someone who FOR SURE would've been in the final otherwise.
Because Darrell unlike Tony could have helped Cory on the game. Darrell would have worked with him and made that clear. Tony was a number against him. Also Cory isn't beating anyone in a final not even Tony.
You should always take out the people that will give you the most trouble in a final. It was a boss move from Cory.
I'm sitting here trying to think of one reason why keeping Darrell over Tony was a good idea and I have nothing lol Cory can beat Tony in a final, he def can't beat Darrell. Darrell didn't come back so no harm no foul. I love Darrell and wanted him there but that was def the best move possible to take a shot of someone who FOR SURE would've been in the final otherwise.
Because Darrell unlike Tony could have helped Cory on the game. Darrell would have worked with him and made that clear. Tony was a number against him. Also Cory isn't beating anyone in a final not even Tony.
Darrell would still beat him in the final, the whole point is to win the final
Tony is equally bad if not worse than Cory at finals but he probably wasn't going to make it regardless so doesn't matter. And at the time Tony and Cory worked together.
Darrell was for sure making the final if he wasn't taken out then, so imo it was the right move.
You should always take out the people that will give you the most trouble in a final. It was a boss move from Cory.
I'm sitting here trying to think of one reason why keeping Darrell over Tony was a good idea and I have nothing lol Cory can beat Tony in a final, he def can't beat Darrell. Darrell didn't come back so no harm no foul. I love Darrell and wanted him there but that was def the best move possible to take a shot of someone who FOR SURE would've been in the final otherwise.
Because Darrell unlike Tony could have helped Cory on the game. Darrell would have worked with him and made that clear. Tony was a number against him. Also Cory isn't beating anyone in a final not even Tony.
Darrell would still beat him in the final, the whole point is to win the final
Tony is equally bad if not worse than Cory at finals but he probably wasn't going to make it regardless so doesn't matter. And at the time Tony and Cory worked together.
Darrell was for sure making the final if he wasn't taken out then, so imo it was the right move.
Then why does Cory show up? He's never winning a final. Tony (who is my least favorite person to ever be on this show) is better than Cory in finals. And, no, Tony was never working with Cory. Tony had John and John's crew at that point. Do we don't remember what happened after that decision? You don't worry about final threats day 1. You first need allies. Darrell >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tony for Cory as an ally.
And if you're getting rid of the best you keep Shane not Tony. It was just dumb no matter how people spin it. A big move to make a big move isn't smart.
Tony and Cory worked together the entire of invasion, the **** purge was the 2nd day they were there lmaoooo the mental gymnastics of it all. Ignoring any and all context for what
Tony and Cory are similar competitors, neither are winning unless there's a team involved. Tony's Vendettas is his only performance and Cory on Bloodlines was a lot more impressive.
giving Tony credit while ******** on someone who's the same as them is weird but not surprising
Tony and Cory worked together the entire of invasion, the **** purge was the 2nd day they were there lmaoooo the mental gymnastics of it all.
Tony and Cory are similar competitors, neither are winning unless there's a team involved. Tony's Vendettas is his only performance and Cory on Bloodlines was a lot more impressive.
giving Tony credit while ******** on someone who's the same as them is weird but not surprising
Not giving Tony credit at all--saying someone is better than Cory at a final is like saying someone is better than Big Easy at a final. We all know it. Goes back to Nelson going into an elimination for Cory--just dumb--Nelson has a slightly better chance to win than Cory.
You should always take out the people that will give you the most trouble in a final. It was a boss move from Cory.
I'm sitting here trying to think of one reason why keeping Darrell over Tony was a good idea and I have nothing lol Cory can beat Tony in a final, he def can't beat Darrell. Darrell didn't come back so no harm no foul. I love Darrell and wanted him there but that was def the best move possible to take a shot of someone who FOR SURE would've been in the final otherwise.
Because Darrell unlike Tony could have helped Cory on the game. Darrell would have worked with him and made that clear. Tony was a number against him. Also Cory isn't beating anyone in a final not even Tony.
Darrell would still beat him in the final, the whole point is to win the final
Tony is equally bad if not worse than Cory at finals but he probably wasn't going to make it regardless so doesn't matter. And at the time Tony and Cory worked together.
Darrell was for sure making the final if he wasn't taken out then, so imo it was the right move.
Then why does Cory show up? He's never winning a final. Tony (who is my least favorite person to ever be on this show) is better than Cory in finals. And, no, Cory was never working with Cory. Tony had John and John's crew at that point. Do we don't remember what happened after that decision? You don't worry about final threats day 1. You first need allies. Darrell >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tony for Cory as an ally.
And if you're getting rid of the best you keep Shane not Tony. It was just dumb no matter how people spin it. A big move to make a big move isn't smart.
Idk where you get off saying Tony is better than Cory at finals given his one final showing in which he got last by a long shot ****. Cory has done better than that at least. By his record, Tony probably isn't making a final and if he does he's likely to do badly.
Cory isn't the best, we all know that. He needs some luck. and he needs to start chopping at threats to win because a lot of guys that season would beat him. His only shot of winning that season was getting rid of Jordan, Darrell, Derrick, and Johnny first and foremost. You don't get that all done by playing safe when you have a clear shot at one of those people. Allies don't mean much when you have that much work to do to even have a shot at winning.
Tony literally finished last in his only final ever how is that better than someone who's been to three and only placed last once
Tony sucks but he had to wait forever which killed his chances. Kind of like saying Mark finished last on The Duel 2. And 1 time, Cory didn't finish last with a male partner but lost to a co-ed team and beat a team of girls that couldn't eat anything. I didn't watch TM but everyone said that the guys all quit after John won so do we even really know how they would have finished?
You should always take out the people that will give you the most trouble in a final. It was a boss move from Cory.
I'm sitting here trying to think of one reason why keeping Darrell over Tony was a good idea and I have nothing lol Cory can beat Tony in a final, he def can't beat Darrell. Darrell didn't come back so no harm no foul. I love Darrell and wanted him there but that was def the best move possible to take a shot of someone who FOR SURE would've been in the final otherwise.
Because Darrell unlike Tony could have helped Cory on the game. Darrell would have worked with him and made that clear. Tony was a number against him. Also Cory isn't beating anyone in a final not even Tony.
Darrell would still beat him in the final, the whole point is to win the final
Tony is equally bad if not worse than Cory at finals but he probably wasn't going to make it regardless so doesn't matter. And at the time Tony and Cory worked together.
Darrell was for sure making the final if he wasn't taken out then, so imo it was the right move.
Then why does Cory show up? He's never winning a final. Tony (who is my least favorite person to ever be on this show) is better than Cory in finals. And, no, Cory was never working with Cory. Tony had John and John's crew at that point. Do we don't remember what happened after that decision? You don't worry about final threats day 1. You first need allies. Darrell >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tony for Cory as an ally.
And if you're getting rid of the best you keep Shane not Tony. It was just dumb no matter how people spin it. A big move to make a big move isn't smart.
Idk where you get off saying Tony is better than Cory at finals given his one final showing in which he got last by a long shot ****. Cory has done better than that at least. By his record, Tony probably isn't making a final and if he does he's likely to do badly.
Cory isn't the best, we all know that. He needs some luck. and he needs to start chopping at threats to win because a lot of guys that season would beat him. His only shot of winning that season was getting rid of Jordan, Darrell, Derrick, and Johnny first and foremost. Even then he'd have to probably get rid of CT, Hunter and Nelson and then he'd have a decent shot. You don't get that all done by playing safe when you have a clear shot at one of those people. Allies don't mean much when you have that much work to do to win.
But you're allies can help you do the work. How is Tony going to help him get work done? It just doesn't make any sense. But whatever. Cory's brilliant--got it
Tony and Cory worked together the entire of invasion, the **** purge was the 2nd day they were there lmaoooo the mental gymnastics of it all.
Tony and Cory are similar competitors, neither are winning unless there's a team involved. Tony's Vendettas is his only performance and Cory on Bloodlines was a lot more impressive.
giving Tony credit while ******** on someone who's the same as them is weird but not surprising
Not giving Tony credit at all--saying someone is better than Cory at a final is like saying someone is better than Big Easy at a final. We all know it. Goes back to Nelson going into an elimination for Cory--just dumb--Nelson has a slightly better chance to win than Cory.
Did keeping Tony help Cory at any point in XXX?
no shit that's the definition of hindsight.
Tony is worse than Cory and he's well within his right to believe he can beat him in a final over Darrell, you're trying to act like Cory while not the best is the worst competitor in the history of this show and it's just intellectually dishonest.
Tony looked horrible in the one final he's ever been in so yeah i'll take the guy who can actually get there and had only looked that bad once.
You should always take out the people that will give you the most trouble in a final. It was a boss move from Cory.
I'm sitting here trying to think of one reason why keeping Darrell over Tony was a good idea and I have nothing lol Cory can beat Tony in a final, he def can't beat Darrell. Darrell didn't come back so no harm no foul. I love Darrell and wanted him there but that was def the best move possible to take a shot of someone who FOR SURE would've been in the final otherwise.
Because Darrell unlike Tony could have helped Cory on the game. Darrell would have worked with him and made that clear. Tony was a number against him. Also Cory isn't beating anyone in a final not even Tony.
Darrell would still beat him in the final, the whole point is to win the final
Tony is equally bad if not worse than Cory at finals but he probably wasn't going to make it regardless so doesn't matter. And at the time Tony and Cory worked together.
Darrell was for sure making the final if he wasn't taken out then, so imo it was the right move.
Then why does Cory show up? He's never winning a final. Tony (who is my least favorite person to ever be on this show) is better than Cory in finals. And, no, Cory was never working with Cory. Tony had John and John's crew at that point. Do we don't remember what happened after that decision? You don't worry about final threats day 1. You first need allies. Darrell >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tony for Cory as an ally.
And if you're getting rid of the best you keep Shane not Tony. It was just dumb no matter how people spin it. A big move to make a big move isn't smart.
Idk where you get off saying Tony is better than Cory at finals given his one final showing in which he got last by a long shot ****. Cory has done better than that at least. By his record, Tony probably isn't making a final and if he does he's likely to do badly.
Cory isn't the best, we all know that. He needs some luck. and he needs to start chopping at threats to win because a lot of guys that season would beat him. His only shot of winning that season was getting rid of Jordan, Darrell, Derrick, and Johnny first and foremost. Even then he'd have to probably get rid of CT, Hunter and Nelson and then he'd have a decent shot. You don't get that all done by playing safe when you have a clear shot at one of those people. Allies don't mean much when you have that much work to do to win.
But you're allies can help you do the work. How is Tony going to help him get work done? It just doesn't make any sense. But whatever. Cory's brilliant--got it
Darrell wasn't going to help Cory get rid of all those people and you know it. **** Darrell can handle his own shit, he doesn't need to get rid of Jordan, Johnny, and Derrick because he has a shot to beat them all anyway. You're acting like Darrell doesn't play the game straight-up like Landon.
Cory would've had to do all that work with or without Darrell and so getting rid of Darrell was the right move.
between Jman and that one Cory stan being delusional and thinking he's winning things and the opposite end of the spectrum acting like he's trash among trash. Can't nobody just admit dudes average and that's okay ****
between Jman and that one Cory stan being delusional and thinking he's winning things and the opposite end of the spectrum acting like he's trash among trash. Can't nobody just admit dudes average and that's okay ****
Phewwww too much talk about the men..... Kam coming for her win perrr I hope she's been training!
Kam will be a champ imo but this isn't her season. She's gonna have a lot of work to do to get rid of Lolo, Natalie, Jenny, and Ashley who imo would probably all beat her in a final. Nicole and Kaycee are threats too if the final isn't puzzle heavy lol
between Jman and that one Cory stan being delusional and thinking he's winning things and the opposite end of the spectrum acting like he's trash among trash. Can't nobody just admit dudes average and that's okay ****
And we left Tony in 2018 **** it is 2020 & The Kang is back.
i miss when kvm was banned **** the stupid arguments just for argument's sake is annoying
Sigh--you think I'm just arguing about Cory to argue. It was a bad game move and we saw the result as he was sent into the first elimination. If people are going to claim it was a great move why shouldn't I argue that? Because you just want everyone here to have the same opinions...
between Jman and that one Cory stan being delusional and thinking he's winning things and the opposite end of the spectrum acting like he's trash among trash. Can't nobody just admit dudes average and that's okay ****
Cory made the right move. Darrell's a strong player that he can't count on to be in his corner. You don't just let someone like that stay in the game when you have the opprotunity to get rid of them. Period.
i miss when kvm was banned **** the stupid arguments just for argument's sake is annoying
kvm is cool when it comes to talking about old school challenges since that's what I grew up with. But I tend to ignore him otherwise. Acts like his opinion is worth more than it really is and if you don't agree with him, then he starts his passive aggressive attacks.
Because Darrell unlike Tony could have helped Cory on the game. Darrell would have worked with him and made that clear. Tony was a number against him. Also Cory isn't beating anyone in a final not even Tony.
Darrell would still beat him in the final, the whole point is to win the final
Tony is equally bad if not worse than Cory at finals but he probably wasn't going to make it regardless so doesn't matter. And at the time Tony and Cory worked together.
Darrell was for sure making the final if he wasn't taken out then, so imo it was the right move.
Then why does Cory show up? He's never winning a final. Tony (who is my least favorite person to ever be on this show) is better than Cory in finals. And, no, Tony was never working with Cory. Tony had John and John's crew at that point. Do we don't remember what happened after that decision? You don't worry about final threats day 1. You first need allies. Darrell >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tony for Cory as an ally.
And if you're getting rid of the best you keep Shane not Tony. It was just dumb no matter how people spin it. A big move to make a big move isn't smart.
Tony and Cory worked together the entire of invasion, the **** purge was the 2nd day they were there lmaoooo the mental gymnastics of it all. Ignoring any and all context for what
Tony and Cory are similar competitors, neither are winning unless there's a team involved. Tony's Vendettas is his only performance and Cory on Bloodlines was a lot more impressive.
giving Tony credit while ******** on someone who's the same as them is weird but not surprising
Tony literally finished last in his only final ever how is that better than someone who's been to three and only placed last once
Not giving Tony credit at all--saying someone is better than Cory at a final is like saying someone is better than Big Easy at a final. We all know it. Goes back to Nelson going into an elimination for Cory--just dumb--Nelson has a slightly better chance to win than Cory.
Did keeping Tony help Cory at any point in XXX?
Idk where you get off saying Tony is better than Cory at finals given his one final showing in which he got last by a long shot ****. Cory has done better than that at least. By his record, Tony probably isn't making a final and if he does he's likely to do badly.
Cory isn't the best, we all know that. He needs some luck. and he needs to start chopping at threats to win because a lot of guys that season would beat him. His only shot of winning that season was getting rid of Jordan, Darrell, Derrick, and Johnny first and foremost. You don't get that all done by playing safe when you have a clear shot at one of those people. Allies don't mean much when you have that much work to do to even have a shot at winning.
Tony sucks but he had to wait forever which killed his chances. Kind of like saying Mark finished last on The Duel 2. And 1 time, Cory didn't finish last with a male partner but lost to a co-ed team and beat a team of girls that couldn't eat anything. I didn't watch TM but everyone said that the guys all quit after John won so do we even really know how they would have finished?
But you're allies can help you do the work. How is Tony going to help him get work done? It just doesn't make any sense. But whatever. Cory's brilliant--got it
no shit that's the definition of hindsight.
Tony is worse than Cory and he's well within his right to believe he can beat him in a final over Darrell, you're trying to act like Cory while not the best is the worst competitor in the history of this show and it's just intellectually dishonest.
Tony looked horrible in the one final he's ever been in so yeah i'll take the guy who can actually get there and had only looked that bad once.
Darrell wasn't going to help Cory get rid of all those people and you know it. **** Darrell can handle his own shit, he doesn't need to get rid of Jordan, Johnny, and Derrick because he has a shot to beat them all anyway. You're acting like Darrell doesn't play the game straight-up like Landon.
Cory would've had to do all that work with or without Darrell and so getting rid of Darrell was the right move.
Lol
between Jman and that one Cory stan being delusional and thinking he's winning things and the opposite end of the spectrum acting like he's trash among trash. Can't nobody just admit dudes average and that's okay ****
Give me a valid comp for Cory....any era
Phewwww too much talk about the men..... Kam coming for her win perrr I hope she's been training!
imagine me going out of my way to give you anything. The audacity ****
That's what I thought
yeah you thought, that's where you went wrong. you're forgiven tho we all make mistakes
Kam will be a champ imo but this isn't her season. She's gonna have a lot of work to do to get rid of Lolo, Natalie, Jenny, and Ashley who imo would probably all beat her in a final. Nicole and Kaycee are threats too if the final isn't puzzle heavy lol
i miss when kvm was banned **** the stupid arguments just for argument's sake is annoying
And we left Tony in 2018 **** it is 2020 & The Kang is back.
Sigh--you think I'm just arguing about Cory to argue. It was a bad game move and we saw the result as he was sent into the first elimination. If people are going to claim it was a great move why shouldn't I argue that? Because you just want everyone here to have the same opinions...
Hey Pink, do you know the current status of the cast and if they're still quarantining, and is the mystery blonde girl really for a singing show?
Okay first off. As a Power Ranger fan you name makes me smile.
Secondly keep this talk about the guys up. The women get too much attention on here tbh.
Thanks
Cory made the right move. Darrell's a strong player that he can't count on to be in his corner. You don't just let someone like that stay in the game when you have the opprotunity to get rid of them. Period.
kvm is cool when it comes to talking about old school challenges since that's what I grew up with. But I tend to ignore him otherwise. Acts like his opinion is worth more than it really is and if you don't agree with him, then he starts his passive aggressive attacks.
His passive aggressive response is a joy to watch.
Who do you guys think will be the best person in the final?
I say either Darrell or Nam.
Pages