Rick screams red herring tbh. He doesn't have a winners edit imo. We don't normally see winners getting undermined or contradicted as often as we've seen with Rick. We are constantly shown he's not the one in control. I think people are confusing visibility with a winners edit. With someone like nick you could tell by the merge, rick hasn't got that. Mike & Ben were also in control for a good part of the game. Rick is just along for the ride.
kvm1977 wrote:I still don't believe Devens wins which might make me an idiot but he's not playing a strong game. I hope he saves Julie this week and goes home next week. Devens wouldn't be one of the worst 5 winners though--at least not IMO
"There is no way Mike is wining its too obvious" "There is no way Ben is wining its too obvious" "There is no way Nick is wining its too obvious" I'm not one to be for editing, but Devin's is getting the same edit that the basic white male gets who wins.
I'm still not convinced the person that returns doesn't win. I also think Gavin and Lauren are legit contenders. Devens may win but making the F3 is going to be tough--he's probably going to have to use the idol and win immunity twice or immunity then the fire building competition.
kvm1977 wrote:I still don't believe Devens wins which might make me an idiot but he's not playing a strong game. I hope he saves Julie this week and goes home next week. Devens wouldn't be one of the worst 5 winners though--at least not IMO
"There is no way Mike is wining its too obvious" "There is no way Ben is wining its too obvious" "There is no way Nick is wining its too obvious" I'm not one to be for editing, but Devin's is getting the same edit that the basic white male gets who wins.
Rick would easily be the worst winner the show history. He was voted out fourth for crying out loud. If you can manage to look past that, theres also his terrible social game, being on the wrong side of the votes all but 3 times, and the fact he has never once had any sort of power. Ben is better, Adam is better, **** fabio might be better than rick at this point
Rick would easily be the worst winner the show history. He was voted out fourth for crying out loud. If you can manage to look past that, theres also his terrible social game, being on the wrong side of the votes all but 3 times, and the fact he has never once had any sort of power. Ben is better, Adam is better, **** fabio might be better than rick at this point
TIL: Winning multiple immunities, getting multiple idols, winning the midseason re-entry twist and orchestrating blindsides when everyone wants you out are all signs of horrible gameplay.
TIL: Winning multiple immunities, getting multiple idols, winning the midseason re-entry twist and orchestrating blindsides when everyone wants you out are all signs of horrible gameplay.
he was voted out like anything else is fine sure but he was voted out that’s an automatic asterisk regardless
TIL: Winning multiple immunities, getting multiple idols, winning the midseason re-entry twist and orchestrating blindsides when everyone wants you out are all signs of horrible gameplay.
he was voted out like anything else is fine sure but he was voted out that’s an automatic asterisk regardless
I'm quite sure the season is called Extinction Island - not Twist is an Asterisk. Whoever wins the season, wins the season. The twist, as stupid as it is...is part of the game.
That said, let's not get ahead of ourselves here. I personally don't see Rick getting much past next tribal unless he catches a real break with the returnee.
Bacchus wrote:TIL: Winning multiple immunities, getting multiple idols, winning the midseason re-entry twist and orchestrating blindsides when everyone wants you out are all signs of horrible gameplay.
he was voted out like anything else is fine sure but he was voted out that’s an automatic asterisk regardless
I'm quite sure the season is called Extinction Island - not Twist is an Asterisk. Whoever wins the season, wins the season. The twist, as stupid as it is...is part of the game. That said, let's not get ahead of ourselves here. I personally don't see Rick getting much past next tribal unless he catches a real break with the returnee.
I get it’s a part of the game but much like Big Brother there’s always a conversation of if the person brought back were to win. It’s gonna always be a conversation and the facts would remain he’d be the only winner to ever be voted out. It looks weird regardless of if it’s a part of the game tbh. I agree I don’t think he wins either just adding to conversation
TIL: Winning multiple immunities, getting multiple idols, winning the midseason re-entry twist and orchestrating blindsides when everyone wants you out are all signs of horrible gameplay.
When you cant get 6 other people to work with you then it's horrible game play. When you're constantly on the bottom and you have done nothing to make yourself look like less of a threat, it's horrible gameplay. Winning immunity isnt actually gameplay, plenty of people win multiple immunity challenges who have awful gameplay, Keith nale is great at immunity challenges, but has zero gameplay skills whatsoever.
So keith had better gameplay than natalie since he won more immunity challenges? Winning immunity challenges is fine but winning them doesn't mean you automatically played a good game.
So keith had better gameplay than natalie since he won more immunity challenges? Winning immunity challenges is fine but winning them doesn't mean you automatically played a good game.
Natalie is the consensus worst winner in Survivor history. I think you better go back to the drawing board with that analogy.
So keith had better gameplay than natalie since he won more immunity challenges? Winning immunity challenges is fine but winning them doesn't mean you automatically played a good game.
Natalie is the consensus worst winner in Survivor history. I think you better go back to the drawing board with that analogy.
So keith had better gameplay than natalie since he won more immunity challenges? Winning immunity challenges is fine but winning them doesn't mean you automatically played a good game.
Natalie is the consensus worst winner in Survivor history. I think you better go back to the drawing board with that analogy.
People love saying that the show should go back to the basics but forget that most of the early seasons had an immunity beast lose to a more strategic player. The challenges have always been way less important than gameplay. **** some of the people considered top winners like earl yul tony todd sandra twice never won the necklace.
People love saying that the show should go back to the basics but forget that most of the early seasons had an immunity beast lose to a more strategic player. The challenges have always been way less important than gameplay. **** some of the people considered top winners like earl yul tony todd sandra twice never won the necklace.
Gameplay should trump winning challenges but there's too many twists for me
Rick screams red herring tbh. He doesn't have a winners edit imo. We don't normally see winners getting undermined or contradicted as often as we've seen with Rick. We are constantly shown he's not the one in control. I think people are confusing visibility with a winners edit. With someone like nick you could tell by the merge, rick hasn't got that. Mike & Ben were also in control for a good part of the game. Rick is just along for the ride.
aww
I'm still not convinced the person that returns doesn't win. I also think Gavin and Lauren are legit contenders. Devens may win but making the F3 is going to be tough--he's probably going to have to use the idol and win immunity twice or immunity then the fire building competition.
It's just pathetic on so many levels
Gavin should be disqualified just for having that ugly *** blue tattoo
****. Rick not only wins immunity but finds the idol AND pulls a fake out at tribal? Scorched earth campaign.
Love the reactions here! "beST sEaSON eVeR eXcePt iF dEveNs wInS tHEn bOTtoM fIVE."
Rick would easily be the worst winner the show history. He was voted out fourth for crying out loud. If you can manage to look past that, theres also his terrible social game, being on the wrong side of the votes all but 3 times, and the fact he has never once had any sort of power. Ben is better, Adam is better, **** fabio might be better than rick at this point
Meanwhile Rick back at camp after tribal...
e94.jpg
TIL: Winning multiple immunities, getting multiple idols, winning the midseason re-entry twist and orchestrating blindsides when everyone wants you out are all signs of horrible gameplay.
https://twitter.com/hashtagfiggy/status/1126294475880501248?s=21
Figgy thinks Devens is playing a great game
he was voted out like anything else is fine sure but he was voted out that’s an automatic asterisk regardless
I'm quite sure the season is called Extinction Island - not Twist is an Asterisk. Whoever wins the season, wins the season. The twist, as stupid as it is...is part of the game.
That said, let's not get ahead of ourselves here. I personally don't see Rick getting much past next tribal unless he catches a real break with the returnee.
I get it’s a part of the game but much like Big Brother there’s always a conversation of if the person brought back were to win. It’s gonna always be a conversation and the facts would remain he’d be the only winner to ever be voted out. It looks weird regardless of if it’s a part of the game tbh. I agree I don’t think he wins either just adding to conversation
When you cant get 6 other people to work with you then it's horrible game play. When you're constantly on the bottom and you have done nothing to make yourself look like less of a threat, it's horrible gameplay. Winning immunity isnt actually gameplay, plenty of people win multiple immunity challenges who have awful gameplay, Keith nale is great at immunity challenges, but has zero gameplay skills whatsoever.
I hate Rick that's all
IT'S LITERALLY ******* GAMEPLAY.
So keith had better gameplay than natalie since he won more immunity challenges? Winning immunity challenges is fine but winning them doesn't mean you automatically played a good game.
Finally, a response that makes sense!
Natalie is the consensus worst winner in Survivor history. I think you better go back to the drawing board with that analogy.
He means Natalie Anderson
Rick is the most annoying man on this show. And there’s a man who calls himself wardog, that say a lot.
People love saying that the show should go back to the basics but forget that most of the early seasons had an immunity beast lose to a more strategic player. The challenges have always been way less important than gameplay. **** some of the people considered top winners like earl yul tony todd sandra twice never won the necklace.
Gameplay should trump winning challenges but there's too many twists for me
Without EOE Rick would be nothing wish it was that way. Season would be way better.
Pages