I hope Mike goes for being an idiot asap. If you can’t handle an annoying personality and jeopardize your position in the game for it, you deserve to lose. Nick is weird af, creeps me out bad.
Nick's weird. Mike's odd. But Natalie had to go. It's honestly ridiculous that anyone is upset she's gone. She added nothing to the show. Absolutely nothing.
What we're seeing is the Goliaths don't believe they need numbers so they're going after each other. That makes sense given the assumed personality
Imagine being that pressed of someone getting voted out.
I know you are desperate for post counts and my attention, lucky for you I’m feeling generous so I’ll actually acknowledge you. Am I pressed? No. The point of a message board is to express your opinion. Am I tweeting about this? Am I sending hate messages to any players? No. Besides when I log into this site have I thought of Survivor? No. As a fan of entertaining tv and Natalie in particular am I bummed she left? Yes. I think Mike made a dumb move and when people make dumb moves, I enjoy seeing it cost them in the game. Contribute to the conversation of the show or go seek attention elsewhere.
Nick's weird. Mike's odd. But Natalie had to go. It's honestly ridiculous that anyone is upset she's gone. She added nothing to the show. Absolutely nothing.What we're seeing is the Goliaths don't believe they need numbers so they're going after each other. That makes sense given the assumed personality
Alright kkkvm, we get you hate Natalie. To say she is useless is absured and shows you just want a reaction. If you disliked her, felt she was negative, bossy, or annoying I totally get that but to act like she was Purple Kelly is insane.
Nick's weird. Mike's odd. But Natalie had to go. It's honestly ridiculous that anyone is upset she's gone. She added nothing to the show. Absolutely nothing.What we're seeing is the Goliaths don't believe they need numbers so they're going after each other. That makes sense given the assumed personality
Alright kkkvm, we get you hate Natalie. To say she is useless is absured and shows you just want a reaction. If you disliked her, felt she was negative, bossy, or annoying I totally get that but to act like she was Purple Kelly is insane.
Again, she added nothing to the show. I don't hate her...her leaving makes the game better. Anyone that can't acknowledge that isn't paying attention to the actual game.
Nick's weird. Mike's odd. But Natalie had to go. It's honestly ridiculous that anyone is upset she's gone. She added nothing to the show. Absolutely nothing.What we're seeing is the Goliaths don't believe they need numbers so they're going after each other. That makes sense given the assumed personality
She's an amazing character, her being gone doesn't help the goliaths, if anything it shows Mike will try and jump ship to the Davids side. The very next vote since they have been merging at 13 is critical and will determine the entire post merge imo. I always think no matter how annoying, you should never get rid of a loyal number. Natalie was someone who made it clear where she would put votes, you don't just go off book.
kvm1977 wrote:Nick's weird. Mike's odd. But Natalie had to go. It's honestly ridiculous that anyone is upset she's gone. She added nothing to the show. Absolutely nothing.What we're seeing is the Goliaths don't believe they need numbers so they're going after each other. That makes sense given the assumed personality
Alright kkkvm, we get you hate Natalie. To say she is useless is absured and shows you just want a reaction. If you disliked her, felt she was negative, bossy, or annoying I totally get that but to act like she was Purple Kelly is insane.
Again, she added nothing to the show. I don't hate her...her leaving makes the game better. Anyone that can't acknowledge that isn't paying attention to the actual game.
We don't like her for her gameplay lol we love her because she's hilarious and a great character. We need those people sometimes, shes great because she's NOTHING like most survivor players.
Nick's weird. Mike's odd. But Natalie had to go. It's honestly ridiculous that anyone is upset she's gone. She added nothing to the show. Absolutely nothing.What we're seeing is the Goliaths don't believe they need numbers so they're going after each other. That makes sense given the assumed personality
She's an amazing character, her being gone doesn't help the goliaths, if anything it shows Mike will try and jump ship to the Davids side. The very next vote since they have been merging at 13 is critical and will determine the entire post merge imo. I always think no matter how annoying, you should never get rid of a loyal number. Natalie was someone who made it clear where she would put votes, you don't just go off book.
I understand your logic but I don't believe that's the best way to play the game. If the Goliaths all stayed together 9 would have made the merge...an alliance of 9 isn't an alliance. You get rid of people that you don't see yourself going deep with. The goal should never be to make the jury
kvm1977 wrote:Nick's weird. Mike's odd. But Natalie had to go. It's honestly ridiculous that anyone is upset she's gone. She added nothing to the show. Absolutely nothing.What we're seeing is the Goliaths don't believe they need numbers so they're going after each other. That makes sense given the assumed personality
Alright kkkvm, we get you hate Natalie. To say she is useless is absured and shows you just want a reaction. If you disliked her, felt she was negative, bossy, or annoying I totally get that but to act like she was Purple Kelly is insane.
Again, she added nothing to the show. I don't hate her...her leaving makes the game better. Anyone that can't acknowledge that isn't paying attention to the actual game.
We don't like her for her gameplay lol we love her because she's hilarious and a great character. We need those people sometimes, shes great because she's NOTHING like most survivor players.
She's not a great character or hilarious but to each their own
kvm1977 wrote:Nick's weird. Mike's odd. But Natalie had to go. It's honestly ridiculous that anyone is upset she's gone. She added nothing to the show. Absolutely nothing.What we're seeing is the Goliaths don't believe they need numbers so they're going after each other. That makes sense given the assumed personality
She's an amazing character, her being gone doesn't help the goliaths, if anything it shows Mike will try and jump ship to the Davids side. The very next vote since they have been merging at 13 is critical and will determine the entire post merge imo. I always think no matter how annoying, you should never get rid of a loyal number. Natalie was someone who made it clear where she would put votes, you don't just go off book.
I understand your logic but I don't believe that's the best way to play the game. If the Goliaths all stayed together 9 would have made the merge...an alliance of 9 isn't an alliance. You get rid of people that you don't see yourself going deep with. The goal should never be to make the jury
Even if we aren't trying to get to the jury with 9, natalie would easily be my number 1 tbh. She's the perfect blend of blindly loyal and no chance to win. I don't see the goliaths or the Davids for that matter sticking together for much longer but like I said everything comes down to this next vote.
Idk if I could handle Natalie while out there, 24/7 someone bossing you around. At least that’s how they showed it. Imagine out of spite she gets the votes to win since you took her there. I’ve never seen someone seem to try to be horrible socially with every single person. I haven’t read interviews, maybe the show just chose all those moments.
Idk if I could handle Natalie while out there, 24/7 someone bossing you around. At least that’s how they showed it. Imagine out of spite she gets the votes to win since you took her there. I’ve never seen someone seem to try to be horrible socially with every single person. I haven’t read interviews, maybe the show just chose all those moments.
kvm1977 wrote:Nick's weird. Mike's odd. But Natalie had to go. It's honestly ridiculous that anyone is upset she's gone. She added nothing to the show. Absolutely nothing.What we're seeing is the Goliaths don't believe they need numbers so they're going after each other. That makes sense given the assumed personality
She's an amazing character, her being gone doesn't help the goliaths, if anything it shows Mike will try and jump ship to the Davids side. The very next vote since they have been merging at 13 is critical and will determine the entire post merge imo. I always think no matter how annoying, you should never get rid of a loyal number. Natalie was someone who made it clear where she would put votes, you don't just go off book.
I understand your logic but I don't believe that's the best way to play the game. If the Goliaths all stayed together 9 would have made the merge...an alliance of 9 isn't an alliance. You get rid of people that you don't see yourself going deep with. The goal should never be to make the jury
Even if we aren't trying to get to the jury with 9, natalie would easily be my number 1 tbh. She's the perfect blend of blindly loyal and no chance to win. I don't see the goliaths or the Davids for that matter sticking together for much longer but like I said everything comes down to this next vote.
You don't keep someone in the game that others see as an easy vote if they reach the final. You get rid of those people as soon as possible. I'd rather go home first than right before tribal because if someone like Natalie gets taken to a final over you then you played an awful game. Mike had absolutely no reason to keep Natalie. If he kept her it would have been an idiotic decision. If so tired of players keeping someone like Natalie around.
kvm1977 wrote:Nick's weird. Mike's odd. But Natalie had to go. It's honestly ridiculous that anyone is upset she's gone. She added nothing to the show. Absolutely nothing.What we're seeing is the Goliaths don't believe they need numbers so they're going after each other. That makes sense given the assumed personality
She's an amazing character, her being gone doesn't help the goliaths, if anything it shows Mike will try and jump ship to the Davids side. The very next vote since they have been merging at 13 is critical and will determine the entire post merge imo. I always think no matter how annoying, you should never get rid of a loyal number. Natalie was someone who made it clear where she would put votes, you don't just go off book.
I understand your logic but I don't believe that's the best way to play the game. If the Goliaths all stayed together 9 would have made the merge...an alliance of 9 isn't an alliance. You get rid of people that you don't see yourself going deep with. The goal should never be to make the jury
Even if we aren't trying to get to the jury with 9, natalie would easily be my number 1 tbh. She's the perfect blend of blindly loyal and no chance to win. I don't see the goliaths or the Davids for that matter sticking together for much longer but like I said everything comes down to this next vote.
You don't keep someone in the game that others see as an easy vote if they reach the final. You get rid of those people as soon as possible. I'd rather go home first than right before tribal because if someone like Natalie gets taken to a final over you then you played an awful game. Mike had absolutely no reason to keep Natalie. If he kept her it would have been an idiotic decision. If so tired of players keeping someone like Natalie around.
Well I really hope you never play because this is super dumb logic. First off, going home first you make less money, less of an experience, no jury, that would be a waste of putting your life on hold for almost 2 months. You are saying basically that you’d rather go first than have a 1/3 shot at winning immunity (cause Natalie wouldn’t win) and going to the final 3. Natalie is a number and disposable at anytime. It was a bad play.
kvm1977 wrote:Nick's weird. Mike's odd. But Natalie had to go. It's honestly ridiculous that anyone is upset she's gone. She added nothing to the show. Absolutely nothing.What we're seeing is the Goliaths don't believe they need numbers so they're going after each other. That makes sense given the assumed personality
She's an amazing character, her being gone doesn't help the goliaths, if anything it shows Mike will try and jump ship to the Davids side. The very next vote since they have been merging at 13 is critical and will determine the entire post merge imo. I always think no matter how annoying, you should never get rid of a loyal number. Natalie was someone who made it clear where she would put votes, you don't just go off book.
I understand your logic but I don't believe that's the best way to play the game. If the Goliaths all stayed together 9 would have made the merge...an alliance of 9 isn't an alliance. You get rid of people that you don't see yourself going deep with. The goal should never be to make the jury
Even if we aren't trying to get to the jury with 9, natalie would easily be my number 1 tbh. She's the perfect blend of blindly loyal and no chance to win. I don't see the goliaths or the Davids for that matter sticking together for much longer but like I said everything comes down to this next vote.
You don't keep someone in the game that others see as an easy vote if they reach the final. You get rid of those people as soon as possible. I'd rather go home first than right before tribal because if someone like Natalie gets taken to a final over you then you played an awful game. Mike had absolutely no reason to keep Natalie. If he kept her it would have been an idiotic decision. If so tired of players keeping someone like Natalie around.
Well I really hope you never play because this is super dumb logic. First off, going home first you make less money, less of an experience, no jury, that would be a waste of putting your life on hold for almost 2 months. You are saying basically that you’d rather go first than have a 1/3 shot at winning immunity (cause Natalie wouldn’t win) and going to the final 3. Natalie is a number and disposable at anytime. It was a bad play.
kvm1977 wrote:Nick's weird. Mike's odd. But Natalie had to go. It's honestly ridiculous that anyone is upset she's gone. She added nothing to the show. Absolutely nothing.What we're seeing is the Goliaths don't believe they need numbers so they're going after each other. That makes sense given the assumed personality
She's an amazing character, her being gone doesn't help the goliaths, if anything it shows Mike will try and jump ship to the Davids side. The very next vote since they have been merging at 13 is critical and will determine the entire post merge imo. I always think no matter how annoying, you should never get rid of a loyal number. Natalie was someone who made it clear where she would put votes, you don't just go off book.
I understand your logic but I don't believe that's the best way to play the game. If the Goliaths all stayed together 9 would have made the merge...an alliance of 9 isn't an alliance. You get rid of people that you don't see yourself going deep with. The goal should never be to make the jury
Even if we aren't trying to get to the jury with 9, natalie would easily be my number 1 tbh. She's the perfect blend of blindly loyal and no chance to win. I don't see the goliaths or the Davids for that matter sticking together for much longer but like I said everything comes down to this next vote.
You don't keep someone in the game that others see as an easy vote if they reach the final. You get rid of those people as soon as possible. I'd rather go home first than right before tribal because if someone like Natalie gets taken to a final over you then you played an awful game. Mike had absolutely no reason to keep Natalie. If he kept her it would have been an idiotic decision. If so tired of players keeping someone like Natalie around.
You absolutely keep around the goats, that's how a lot of winners win....... it might not be as impressive but it's effective
kvm1977 wrote:Nick's weird. Mike's odd. But Natalie had to go. It's honestly ridiculous that anyone is upset she's gone. She added nothing to the show. Absolutely nothing.What we're seeing is the Goliaths don't believe they need numbers so they're going after each other. That makes sense given the assumed personality
She's an amazing character, her being gone doesn't help the goliaths, if anything it shows Mike will try and jump ship to the Davids side. The very next vote since they have been merging at 13 is critical and will determine the entire post merge imo. I always think no matter how annoying, you should never get rid of a loyal number. Natalie was someone who made it clear where she would put votes, you don't just go off book.
I understand your logic but I don't believe that's the best way to play the game. If the Goliaths all stayed together 9 would have made the merge...an alliance of 9 isn't an alliance. You get rid of people that you don't see yourself going deep with. The goal should never be to make the jury
Even if we aren't trying to get to the jury with 9, natalie would easily be my number 1 tbh. She's the perfect blend of blindly loyal and no chance to win. I don't see the goliaths or the Davids for that matter sticking together for much longer but like I said everything comes down to this next vote.
You don't keep someone in the game that others see as an easy vote if they reach the final. You get rid of those people as soon as possible. I'd rather go home first than right before tribal because if someone like Natalie gets taken to a final over you then you played an awful game. Mike had absolutely no reason to keep Natalie. If he kept her it would have been an idiotic decision. If so tired of players keeping someone like Natalie around.
Well I really hope you never play because this is super dumb logic. First off, going home first you make less money, less of an experience, no jury, that would be a waste of putting your life on hold for almost 2 months. You are saying basically that you’d rather go first than have a 1/3 shot at winning immunity (cause Natalie wouldn’t win) and going to the final 3. Natalie is a number and disposable at anytime. It was a bad play.
i don't need the money--if I go I'm going to win. I'm always going to get rid of dead weight. I don't respect those that don't. Natalie needed to go. She added nothing to Mike's game. Why would he keep her? I'm not tolerating her personality knowing that she's going to take a spot from someone actually playing the game. She's probably a great person outside the game. She needed to go though. Mike played it perfectly. And, she's not disposal at any time...the furhter you get into the game it's going to be more difficult to get the numbers to take out a useless person
kvm1977 wrote:Nick's weird. Mike's odd. But Natalie had to go. It's honestly ridiculous that anyone is upset she's gone. She added nothing to the show. Absolutely nothing.What we're seeing is the Goliaths don't believe they need numbers so they're going after each other. That makes sense given the assumed personality
She's an amazing character, her being gone doesn't help the goliaths, if anything it shows Mike will try and jump ship to the Davids side. The very next vote since they have been merging at 13 is critical and will determine the entire post merge imo. I always think no matter how annoying, you should never get rid of a loyal number. Natalie was someone who made it clear where she would put votes, you don't just go off book.
I understand your logic but I don't believe that's the best way to play the game. If the Goliaths all stayed together 9 would have made the merge...an alliance of 9 isn't an alliance. You get rid of people that you don't see yourself going deep with. The goal should never be to make the jury
Even if we aren't trying to get to the jury with 9, natalie would easily be my number 1 tbh. She's the perfect blend of blindly loyal and no chance to win. I don't see the goliaths or the Davids for that matter sticking together for much longer but like I said everything comes down to this next vote.
You don't keep someone in the game that others see as an easy vote if they reach the final. You get rid of those people as soon as possible. I'd rather go home first than right before tribal because if someone like Natalie gets taken to a final over you then you played an awful game. Mike had absolutely no reason to keep Natalie. If he kept her it would have been an idiotic decision. If so tired of players keeping someone like Natalie around.
You absolutely keep around the goats, that's how a lot of winners win....... it might not be as impressive but it's effective
And it's how a ton of people blew their chance to win
kvm1977 wrote:Nick's weird. Mike's odd. But Natalie had to go. It's honestly ridiculous that anyone is upset she's gone. She added nothing to the show. Absolutely nothing.What we're seeing is the Goliaths don't believe they need numbers so they're going after each other. That makes sense given the assumed personality
She's an amazing character, her being gone doesn't help the goliaths, if anything it shows Mike will try and jump ship to the Davids side. The very next vote since they have been merging at 13 is critical and will determine the entire post merge imo. I always think no matter how annoying, you should never get rid of a loyal number. Natalie was someone who made it clear where she would put votes, you don't just go off book.
I understand your logic but I don't believe that's the best way to play the game. If the Goliaths all stayed together 9 would have made the merge...an alliance of 9 isn't an alliance. You get rid of people that you don't see yourself going deep with. The goal should never be to make the jury
Even if we aren't trying to get to the jury with 9, natalie would easily be my number 1 tbh. She's the perfect blend of blindly loyal and no chance to win. I don't see the goliaths or the Davids for that matter sticking together for much longer but like I said everything comes down to this next vote.
You don't keep someone in the game that others see as an easy vote if they reach the final. You get rid of those people as soon as possible. I'd rather go home first than right before tribal because if someone like Natalie gets taken to a final over you then you played an awful game. Mike had absolutely no reason to keep Natalie. If he kept her it would have been an idiotic decision. If so tired of players keeping someone like Natalie around.
You absolutely keep around the goats, that's how a lot of winners win....... it might not be as impressive but it's effective
And it's how a ton of people blew their chance to win
it's all about risk management, taking a goat further helps you, I don't think realistically natalie makes it to the final 10 let alone final tribal but she's an easy vote to cut the second she's a liability. She isn't dangerous, she won't turn on you, she's someone you can trust because she's too stubborn to change her plan, she's the kind of alliance you should want.
I'll say this, it makes more sense for Mike to make this move as opposed to Alec last week since He's on the outs. Alec was in a extremely safe position but now is my predicted boot if orange loses
kvm1977 wrote:Nick's weird. Mike's odd. But Natalie had to go. It's honestly ridiculous that anyone is upset she's gone. She added nothing to the show. Absolutely nothing.What we're seeing is the Goliaths don't believe they need numbers so they're going after each other. That makes sense given the assumed personality
She's an amazing character, her being gone doesn't help the goliaths, if anything it shows Mike will try and jump ship to the Davids side. The very next vote since they have been merging at 13 is critical and will determine the entire post merge imo. I always think no matter how annoying, you should never get rid of a loyal number. Natalie was someone who made it clear where she would put votes, you don't just go off book.
I understand your logic but I don't believe that's the best way to play the game. If the Goliaths all stayed together 9 would have made the merge...an alliance of 9 isn't an alliance. You get rid of people that you don't see yourself going deep with. The goal should never be to make the jury
Even if we aren't trying to get to the jury with 9, natalie would easily be my number 1 tbh. She's the perfect blend of blindly loyal and no chance to win. I don't see the goliaths or the Davids for that matter sticking together for much longer but like I said everything comes down to this next vote.
You don't keep someone in the game that others see as an easy vote if they reach the final. You get rid of those people as soon as possible. I'd rather go home first than right before tribal because if someone like Natalie gets taken to a final over you then you played an awful game. Mike had absolutely no reason to keep Natalie. If he kept her it would have been an idiotic decision. If so tired of players keeping someone like Natalie around.
You absolutely keep around the goats, that's how a lot of winners win....... it might not be as impressive but it's effective
And it's how a ton of people blew their chance to win
it's all about risk management, taking a goat further helps you, I don't think realistically natalie makes it to the final 10 let alone final tribal but she's an easy vote to cut the second she's a liability. She isn't dangerous, she won't turn on you, she's someone you can trust because she's too stubborn to change her plan, she's the kind of alliance you should want.
You're undersetimating her in once sense--she's opportunistic. She would absolutely jump ship if needed. Again, this particular situation was about what was best for Mike's game. Natalie was never going to help Mike long term. Never. I'd play like the Goliaths. I'm going to target people that I think hurt my game--that doesn't necessarily mean a threat. It's a strategy. Just like keeping numbers and carrying the weak is a strategy. And, again, I'm not trusting other people to cut Natalie when I think she need to go. If I was Mike I would have done the exact same thing. It may or may not work out but I'm not carrying her in the hopes others realize what I realize now. Also, Lyrsa nor Nick are threats either so it's the perfect time to take out Natalie
I'll say this, it makes more sense for Mike to make this move as opposed to Alec last week since He's on the outs. Alec was in a extremely safe position but now is my predicted boot if orange loses
kvm1977 wrote:Nick's weird. Mike's odd. But Natalie had to go. It's honestly ridiculous that anyone is upset she's gone. She added nothing to the show. Absolutely nothing.What we're seeing is the Goliaths don't believe they need numbers so they're going after each other. That makes sense given the assumed personality
She's an amazing character, her being gone doesn't help the goliaths, if anything it shows Mike will try and jump ship to the Davids side. The very next vote since they have been merging at 13 is critical and will determine the entire post merge imo. I always think no matter how annoying, you should never get rid of a loyal number. Natalie was someone who made it clear where she would put votes, you don't just go off book.
I understand your logic but I don't believe that's the best way to play the game. If the Goliaths all stayed together 9 would have made the merge...an alliance of 9 isn't an alliance. You get rid of people that you don't see yourself going deep with. The goal should never be to make the jury
Even if we aren't trying to get to the jury with 9, natalie would easily be my number 1 tbh. She's the perfect blend of blindly loyal and no chance to win. I don't see the goliaths or the Davids for that matter sticking together for much longer but like I said everything comes down to this next vote.
You don't keep someone in the game that others see as an easy vote if they reach the final. You get rid of those people as soon as possible. I'd rather go home first than right before tribal because if someone like Natalie gets taken to a final over you then you played an awful game. Mike had absolutely no reason to keep Natalie. If he kept her it would have been an idiotic decision. If so tired of players keeping someone like Natalie around.
You absolutely keep around the goats, that's how a lot of winners win....... it might not be as impressive but it's effective
And it's how a ton of people blew their chance to win
it's all about risk management, taking a goat further helps you, I don't think realistically natalie makes it to the final 10 let alone final tribal but she's an easy vote to cut the second she's a liability. She isn't dangerous, she won't turn on you, she's someone you can trust because she's too stubborn to change her plan, she's the kind of alliance you should want.
You're undersetimating her in once sense--she's opportunistic. She would absolutely jump ship if needed. Again, this particular situation was about what was best for Mike's game. Natalie was never going to help Mike long term. Never. I'd play like the Goliaths. I'm going to target people that I think hurt my game--that doesn't necessarily mean a threat. It's a strategy. Just like keeping numbers and carrying the weak is a strategy. And, again, I'm not trusting other people to cut Natalie when I think she need to go. If I was Mike I would have done the exact same thing. It may or may not work out but I'm not carrying her in the hopes others realize what I realize now. Also, Lyrsa nor Nick are threats either so it's the perfect time to take out Natalie
I wouldn't say nick isn't a threat, he is someone who could skate by before people actually see how dangerous he is. We've seen him make strong connections with Mike, Christian and Elizabeth. I see him being a dark horse
i don't think keeping the goats is always the right choice, but Natalie was a for sure number for his side, whereas Lyrsa is more of an unknown, so it was definitely dumb, starving for two weeks, being tired all the time, and having to deal with Natalie every day though, i don't blame him for just getting rid of her. i love Natalie for the entertainment she brings, but i would absolutely lose it if i had to deal with her for that long.
Imagine being that pressed of someone getting voted out.
I know you are desperate for post counts and my attention, lucky for you I’m feeling generous so I’ll actually acknowledge you. Am I pressed? No. The point of a message board is to express your opinion. Am I tweeting about this? Am I sending hate messages to any players? No. Besides when I log into this site have I thought of Survivor? No. As a fan of entertaining tv and Natalie in particular am I bummed she left? Yes. I think Mike made a dumb move and when people make dumb moves, I enjoy seeing it cost them in the game. Contribute to the conversation of the show or go seek attention elsewhere.
Yes! All of this.
Imagine being that pressed of someone getting voted out.
Nick's weird. Mike's odd. But Natalie had to go. It's honestly ridiculous that anyone is upset she's gone. She added nothing to the show. Absolutely nothing.
What we're seeing is the Goliaths don't believe they need numbers so they're going after each other. That makes sense given the assumed personality
I know you are desperate for post counts and my attention, lucky for you I’m feeling generous so I’ll actually acknowledge you. Am I pressed? No. The point of a message board is to express your opinion. Am I tweeting about this? Am I sending hate messages to any players? No. Besides when I log into this site have I thought of Survivor? No. As a fan of entertaining tv and Natalie in particular am I bummed she left? Yes. I think Mike made a dumb move and when people make dumb moves, I enjoy seeing it cost them in the game. Contribute to the conversation of the show or go seek attention elsewhere.
Alright kkkvm, we get you hate Natalie. To say she is useless is absured and shows you just want a reaction. If you disliked her, felt she was negative, bossy, or annoying I totally get that but to act like she was Purple Kelly is insane.
Again, she added nothing to the show. I don't hate her...her leaving makes the game better. Anyone that can't acknowledge that isn't paying attention to the actual game.
Next.
Yupp--that's what the tribe told her last night
She's an amazing character, her being gone doesn't help the goliaths, if anything it shows Mike will try and jump ship to the Davids side. The very next vote since they have been merging at 13 is critical and will determine the entire post merge imo. I always think no matter how annoying, you should never get rid of a loyal number. Natalie was someone who made it clear where she would put votes, you don't just go off book.
We don't like her for her gameplay lol we love her because she's hilarious and a great character. We need those people sometimes, shes great because she's NOTHING like most survivor players.
I understand your logic but I don't believe that's the best way to play the game. If the Goliaths all stayed together 9 would have made the merge...an alliance of 9 isn't an alliance. You get rid of people that you don't see yourself going deep with. The goal should never be to make the jury
She's not a great character or hilarious but to each their own
Even if we aren't trying to get to the jury with 9, natalie would easily be my number 1 tbh. She's the perfect blend of blindly loyal and no chance to win. I don't see the goliaths or the Davids for that matter sticking together for much longer but like I said everything comes down to this next vote.
Idk if I could handle Natalie while out there, 24/7 someone bossing you around. At least that’s how they showed it. Imagine out of spite she gets the votes to win since you took her there. I’ve never seen someone seem to try to be horrible socially with every single person. I haven’t read interviews, maybe the show just chose all those moments.
She was decent with Angelina
You don't keep someone in the game that others see as an easy vote if they reach the final. You get rid of those people as soon as possible. I'd rather go home first than right before tribal because if someone like Natalie gets taken to a final over you then you played an awful game. Mike had absolutely no reason to keep Natalie. If he kept her it would have been an idiotic decision. If so tired of players keeping someone like Natalie around.
Well I really hope you never play because this is super dumb logic. First off, going home first you make less money, less of an experience, no jury, that would be a waste of putting your life on hold for almost 2 months. You are saying basically that you’d rather go first than have a 1/3 shot at winning immunity (cause Natalie wouldn’t win) and going to the final 3. Natalie is a number and disposable at anytime. It was a bad play.
You absolutely keep around the goats, that's how a lot of winners win....... it might not be as impressive but it's effective
These past two tribals have been awful long term choices. Although Mike was already on the outs so he's likely flipping sides imo.
i don't need the money--if I go I'm going to win. I'm always going to get rid of dead weight. I don't respect those that don't. Natalie needed to go. She added nothing to Mike's game. Why would he keep her? I'm not tolerating her personality knowing that she's going to take a spot from someone actually playing the game. She's probably a great person outside the game. She needed to go though. Mike played it perfectly. And, she's not disposal at any time...the furhter you get into the game it's going to be more difficult to get the numbers to take out a useless person
And it's how a ton of people blew their chance to win
it's all about risk management, taking a goat further helps you, I don't think realistically natalie makes it to the final 10 let alone final tribal but she's an easy vote to cut the second she's a liability. She isn't dangerous, she won't turn on you, she's someone you can trust because she's too stubborn to change her plan, she's the kind of alliance you should want.
I'll say this, it makes more sense for Mike to make this move as opposed to Alec last week since He's on the outs. Alec was in a extremely safe position but now is my predicted boot if orange loses
You're undersetimating her in once sense--she's opportunistic. She would absolutely jump ship if needed. Again, this particular situation was about what was best for Mike's game. Natalie was never going to help Mike long term. Never. I'd play like the Goliaths. I'm going to target people that I think hurt my game--that doesn't necessarily mean a threat. It's a strategy. Just like keeping numbers and carrying the weak is a strategy. And, again, I'm not trusting other people to cut Natalie when I think she need to go. If I was Mike I would have done the exact same thing. It may or may not work out but I'm not carrying her in the hopes others realize what I realize now. Also, Lyrsa nor Nick are threats either so it's the perfect time to take out Natalie
Yes, Alec made a move just to make a move
I wouldn't say nick isn't a threat, he is someone who could skate by before people actually see how dangerous he is. We've seen him make strong connections with Mike, Christian and Elizabeth. I see him being a dark horse
i don't think keeping the goats is always the right choice, but Natalie was a for sure number for his side, whereas Lyrsa is more of an unknown, so it was definitely dumb, starving for two weeks, being tired all the time, and having to deal with Natalie every day though, i don't blame him for just getting rid of her. i love Natalie for the entertainment she brings, but i would absolutely lose it if i had to deal with her for that long.
Nick and Christian >>>>> John is really cool too
I wasn't talking about you lol. But go off.
Pages