It's actually not that hard to place some of the people who've only done 1-2 challenges in certain tiers because they've done more in 1 challenge (Cooke, Brittini, Svetlanta) than some have in 3 or 4 or 5. Here's how I would base it - I know some will disagree but this is based on overall performance skewing higher with athleticism. Each group isn't in order, that's too tough...and time consuming haha Tier 1 – Emily Bailey, Evelyn, Laurel, Emily Schrom, Rachel - Top 5 for sure. Tier 2 – Cooke, Jodi, Holly Shand, Cara Maria, Camila, Theresa, Sarah Rice , Paula, Jillian , Coral Tier 3 - Kelley , Ellen, Ruthie, Christena Pyle, Kendal, KellyAnne, Brittini, Ashley Mitchell, Ruthie, Veronica , JennaTier 4 – Kina, Aneesa, Beth, Tonya, Tina, Susie, Svetlana, Nany, Nia, Averey, Nicole Zanatta , Nicole Ramos, Tori, JennTier 5 – Mandi, Cara Z, Irulan, Trishelle, Kim, Jonna, Marie, Lori, Janelle, Ashley K., Diem, Mallory , Robin, Elka, JulieTier 6 – Anne, Ayanna, Jasmine, Ibis, Sarah Greyson, Katie Doyle, Jessica, Amanda, Sylvia, Kailah, Jemmye, Christina LeBlancTier 7 – Amaya, Arissa, Brittany, Casey, Colie, Devyn, Genesis, Jisela, Johanna, Sam McGinn, Simone, Melinda,Tier 8 – Brooke, Cameran, Emilee, Katelynn, Latoya, Emilee, Leah, Montana, Naomi, Rachel M., Shauvon
I agree with alot of that! I just don't get how so many people put Emily Bailey in a higher tier when Ruthie & Ellen consistently out performed her on Sexes. Emily never even won an ion and they had two apiece.
Good point! Thats definitely up for debate. I actually had Ellen in Tier 2 but felt it was unfair to have Ruthie in 3. Ruthie's proved (for me at least), shes not as strong overall as people think. I based Emily on all 3 of her challenges compared to all of Ruthies handful and Ellens 1. Ellen's wins were also mostly strategic. She DQ'd on 1 or 2 physical missions. Ruthie also didn't have many standout moments after her first challenge. Emily was consistent on all the endurance and adrenaline ones which stood out to me.
Good point! Thats definitely up for debate. I actually had Ellen in Tier 2 but felt it was unfair to have Ruthie in 3. Ruthie's proved (for me at least), shes not as strong overall as people think. I based Emily on all 3 of her challenges compared to all of Ruthies handful and Ellens 1. Ellen's wins were also mostly strategic. She DQ'd on 1 or 2 physical missions. Ruthie also didn't have many standout moments after her first challenge. Emily was consistent on all the endurance and adrenaline ones which stood out to me.
I agree, of the three Emily is probably the most well rounded so I guess I do get her ranking. I just find myself wanting to give Ellen & Ruthie a boost just because they had moments that shined brighter than anything Emily did, but I can see how Emily has proven to be more capable as a whole. Also I tend to block out how easy it was for Kim to take Ruthie out in the Duel....
This just makes me rememberhow much I miss Ruthie. I hope we see her again with the new wave of old schoolers returning. Such an underrated challenger.
Here's 3-5 people in my tiers--if you have someone you're curious about ask. Remember we all base it on different things. I consider strength, endurance, strategy, desire & intelligence.
Tier 1: Laurel, Holly, Evelyn & Emily B (Debatable Rachel R & Jodi)
Tier 2: Emily S, Tori H, Camila, Cara Maria & Ruthie
Tier 3: Coral, Susie, Veronica, Sarah, Jenn, Jillian & Kina
Tier 4: Theresa, Nany, Jonna, Ashley M & Julie S
Tier 5: Paula, Diem, Tara, Kimberly & KellyAnne
Tier 6: Brittini S, Cooke, Irulan, Christena, Mallory & Kendal (people who could have been great)
This just makes me rememberhow much I miss Ruthie. I hope we see her again with the new wave of old schoolers returning. Such an underrated challenger.
shut da *** up nd put a selfie onn ya profe pic dat ain't ya catfish
I dont like her, but IMO Sarah should be top tier. Highly unpopular opinion.
Sarah's tough for me. I don't think she's a great strategist but had moments and she's definitely not a great athlete. Her social game is nearly flawless, her desire to win is off the charts and her endurance improved. The whole Cara Maria, Camila & Sarah debate is difficult for me. I'm not sure who in that group is really 2nd tier or 3rd tier but Sarah can't hang with most of that first tier...at least not Laurel, Evelyn, Holly & Evelyn.
Also, someone previously mentioned that Emily struggled on Sexes but she really didn't Rachel R ****** up the first mission costing her points and then she sat out a mission yet was still in the inner-circle
Off topic but I can't be the only one who thinks Sarah is so obnoxious and fake everytime she pretends to act shocked when they announce a twist. She drops her mouth wider than Nia did when she was on her knees in the bathroom with Leroy.
Off topic but I can't be the only one who thinks Sarah is so obnoxious and fake everytime she pretends to act shocked when they announce a twist. She drops her mouth wider than Nia did when she was on her knees in the bathroom with Leroy.
Amanda is difficult for me because I didn't watch Rivals 3 but I thought she was solid during Invasion. Probably in the 5-7 range but i need to see more
Let me just explain my reasoning for Sarah being Tier 1...
1)She has the most finals appearences of 5 and has won twice while most girls in tier 1 and 2 are no where near to matching that record. In the final she's always been a consistently strong force minus cutthroat. I believe she would have won serveral more times had she had better luck with teammates. Imagine had Brad not been DQ'd they could have easily won The Ruins, and imagine had Devyn/JD been eliminated; Chet and Sarah would have destroyed that final.
2)She has a good elimination record with only 2 losses on FM2 and Rivals. Meaning she hasnt lost an elimination since 2011 and she retired in 2016, that's impressive IMO. Also, we never got to see her in an individual format so we dont know how strong she would have been alone. I think she could have gone far in Free Agents.
3)She constantly got screwed by partners or was put on a shitty team. Someone like Laurel or Rachel would have done basically the same if stuck with the shitty people she got paired with.
Let me just explain my reasoning for Sarah being Tier 1...1)She has the most finals appearences of 5 and has won twice while most girls in tier 1 and 2 are no where near to matching that record. In the final she's always been a consistently strong force minus cutthroat. I believe she would have won serveral more times had she had better luck with teammates. Imagine had Brad not been DQ'd they could have easily won The Ruins, and imagine had Devyn/JD been eliminated; Chet and Sarah would have destroyed that final.2)She has a good elimination record with only 2 losses on FM2 and Rivals. Meaning she hasnt lost an elimination since 2011 and she retired in 2016, that's impressive IMO. Also, we never got to see her in an individual format so we dont know how strong she would have been alone. I think she could have gone far in Free Agents.3)She constantly got screwed by partners or was put on a shitty team. Someone like Laurel or Rachel would have done basically the same if stuck with the shitty people she got paired with.
Those girls in tier 1 didn't do as many seasons as Sarah. And, you're right, she doesn't have many losses but she doesn't have any impressive wins either. Sarah's just not an elite athlete--she isn't. IMO--to be first tier you have to be a true athlete
Let me just explain my reasoning for Sarah being Tier 1...1)She has the most finals appearences of 5 and has won twice while most girls in tier 1 and 2 are no where near to matching that record. In the final she's always been a consistently strong force minus cutthroat. I believe she would have won serveral more times had she had better luck with teammates. Imagine had Brad not been DQ'd they could have easily won The Ruins, and imagine had Devyn/JD been eliminated; Chet and Sarah would have destroyed that final.2)She has a good elimination record with only 2 losses on FM2 and Rivals. Meaning she hasnt lost an elimination since 2011 and she retired in 2016, that's impressive IMO. Also, we never got to see her in an individual format so we dont know how strong she would have been alone. I think she could have gone far in Free Agents.3)She constantly got screwed by partners or was put on a shitty team. Someone like Laurel or Rachel would have done basically the same if stuck with the shitty people she got paired with.
Those girls in tier 1 didn't do as many seasons as Sarah. And, you're right, she doesn't have many losses but she doesn't have any impressive wins either. Sarah's just not an elite athlete--she isn't. IMO--to be first tier you have to be a true athlete
I dont even know who Holly and Emily B are. Plus werent challenges back in the day super easy? How are they elite.
HonestTea101 wrote:Let me just explain my reasoning for Sarah being Tier 1...1)She has the most finals appearences of 5 and has won twice while most girls in tier 1 and 2 are no where near to matching that record. In the final she's always been a consistently strong force minus cutthroat. I believe she would have won serveral more times had she had better luck with teammates. Imagine had Brad not been DQ'd they could have easily won The Ruins, and imagine had Devyn/JD been eliminated; Chet and Sarah would have destroyed that final.2)She has a good elimination record with only 2 losses on FM2 and Rivals. Meaning she hasnt lost an elimination since 2011 and she retired in 2016, that's impressive IMO. Also, we never got to see her in an individual format so we dont know how strong she would have been alone. I think she could have gone far in Free Agents.3)She constantly got screwed by partners or was put on a shitty team. Someone like Laurel or Rachel would have done basically the same if stuck with the shitty people she got paired with.
Those girls in tier 1 didn't do as many seasons as Sarah. And, you're right, she doesn't have many losses but she doesn't have any impressive wins either. Sarah's just not an elite athlete--she isn't. IMO--to be first tier you have to be a true athlete
I dont even know who Holly and Emily B are. Plus werent challenges back in the day super easy? How are they elite.
Holly and Emily B are just insane athletes. Holly had size, strength, endurance and intelligence. She was the best girl by far on The Inferno. Emily B was arguably the best strategist and taught Veronca how to play the game by twice screwing her over. Emily did everything well. Holly was also arguably the best leader we've ever seen. Supportive and strategic. If you watch Sexes or The Inferno you'll see why people love them as competitors. I'd take Holly over many guys
The thing with Sarah is she is underrated but put her up against any of the elite "tier 1" girls and she will most likely get crushed in a physical elimination or in a final. Sarah is beatable in almost anything while it would be almost shocking to see someone like Laurel or Ev lose one on one.
Good point! Thats definitely up for debate. I actually had Ellen in Tier 2 but felt it was unfair to have Ruthie in 3. Ruthie's proved (for me at least), shes not as strong overall as people think. I based Emily on all 3 of her challenges compared to all of Ruthies handful and Ellens 1. Ellen's wins were also mostly strategic. She DQ'd on 1 or 2 physical missions. Ruthie also didn't have many standout moments after her first challenge. Emily was consistent on all the endurance and adrenaline ones which stood out to me.
I agree, of the three Emily is probably the most well rounded so I guess I do get her ranking. I just find myself wanting to give Ellen & Ruthie a boost just because they had moments that shined brighter than anything Emily did, but I can see how Emily has proven to be more capable as a whole. Also I tend to block out how easy it was for Kim to take Ruthie out in the Duel....
This just makes me rememberhow much I miss Ruthie. I hope we see her again with the new wave of old schoolers returning. Such an underrated challenger.
Here's 3-5 people in my tiers--if you have someone you're curious about ask. Remember we all base it on different things. I consider strength, endurance, strategy, desire & intelligence.
Tier 1: Laurel, Holly, Evelyn & Emily B (Debatable Rachel R & Jodi)
Tier 2: Emily S, Tori H, Camila, Cara Maria & Ruthie
Tier 3: Coral, Susie, Veronica, Sarah, Jenn, Jillian & Kina
Tier 4: Theresa, Nany, Jonna, Ashley M & Julie S
Tier 5: Paula, Diem, Tara, Kimberly & KellyAnne
Tier 6: Brittini S, Cooke, Irulan, Christena, Mallory & Kendal (people who could have been great)
Tier 7: Aneesa, Beth, Tina, Cara Z, Tonya & Robin
Tier 8: Averey, Kailah & Nia
Tier 9: Johanna, Nicole R & Kat
Tier 10: Genesis, Katie, Ibis & Melissa
Tier 11: Ayanna, Nicole Z, Piggy, Jill T
Tier 12: Trishelle & Svetlana
Tier 13: Mandi, Cynthia, Angel & Amaya
Tier 14: Brianna, McKenzie, Sylvia & Ayiiia
Tier 15: Jemmye, Shavonda & Arissa
Tier 16: Jasmine, Casey & Becky B
Tier 17: Christina L, Anika, LaToya & Priscilla
Tier 18: Rachel Moyal, Jessica, Montana & Jisela
TIer 19: Cameran, Colie, Lacey & Leah
Tier 20: Brooke, Emilee, Shauvon & Katelynn
tbh this is kind of over thinking it a little bit
Yeah, it probably is but don't we all overthink everything with this show--lol
I dont like her, but IMO Sarah should be top tier. Highly unpopular opinion.
shut da *** up nd put a selfie onn ya profe pic dat ain't ya catfish
dat ain't u in dat pickture
Y'all nead 2 put ya reel face in dat profile pickture
No.
Well this changes everything.
Sarah's tough for me. I don't think she's a great strategist but had moments and she's definitely not a great athlete. Her social game is nearly flawless, her desire to win is off the charts and her endurance improved. The whole Cara Maria, Camila & Sarah debate is difficult for me. I'm not sure who in that group is really 2nd tier or 3rd tier but Sarah can't hang with most of that first tier...at least not Laurel, Evelyn, Holly & Evelyn.
Also, someone previously mentioned that Emily struggled on Sexes but she really didn't Rachel R ****** up the first mission costing her points and then she sat out a mission yet was still in the inner-circle
"hey boo"
lol
Off topic but I can't be the only one who thinks Sarah is so obnoxious and fake everytime she pretends to act shocked when they announce a twist. She drops her mouth wider than Nia did when she was on her knees in the bathroom with Leroy.
Oh you would know about "Brazilian" people would you #SIP
****
Tier 4 is my favorite lol. But where's Amanda? Good job btw!
hahaha
2add0c10c0c75f160b54327e87971ddf.png
Amanda is difficult for me because I didn't watch Rivals 3 but I thought she was solid during Invasion. Probably in the 5-7 range but i need to see more
Amanda is trash so she didn't get on.
Let me just explain my reasoning for Sarah being Tier 1...
1)She has the most finals appearences of 5 and has won twice while most girls in tier 1 and 2 are no where near to matching that record. In the final she's always been a consistently strong force minus cutthroat. I believe she would have won serveral more times had she had better luck with teammates. Imagine had Brad not been DQ'd they could have easily won The Ruins, and imagine had Devyn/JD been eliminated; Chet and Sarah would have destroyed that final.
2)She has a good elimination record with only 2 losses on FM2 and Rivals. Meaning she hasnt lost an elimination since 2011 and she retired in 2016, that's impressive IMO. Also, we never got to see her in an individual format so we dont know how strong she would have been alone. I think she could have gone far in Free Agents.
3)She constantly got screwed by partners or was put on a shitty team. Someone like Laurel or Rachel would have done basically the same if stuck with the shitty people she got paired with.
Those girls in tier 1 didn't do as many seasons as Sarah. And, you're right, she doesn't have many losses but she doesn't have any impressive wins either. Sarah's just not an elite athlete--she isn't. IMO--to be first tier you have to be a true athlete
I dont even know who Holly and Emily B are. Plus werent challenges back in the day super easy? How are they elite.
Holly and Emily B are just insane athletes. Holly had size, strength, endurance and intelligence. She was the best girl by far on The Inferno. Emily B was arguably the best strategist and taught Veronca how to play the game by twice screwing her over. Emily did everything well. Holly was also arguably the best leader we've ever seen. Supportive and strategic. If you watch Sexes or The Inferno you'll see why people love them as competitors. I'd take Holly over many guys
Sarah's just not an athlete...great competitor not an athlete.
The thing with Sarah is she is underrated but put her up against any of the elite "tier 1" girls and she will most likely get crushed in a physical elimination or in a final. Sarah is beatable in almost anything while it would be almost shocking to see someone like Laurel or Ev lose one on one.
I seriously need to see Sarah vs Laurel or Laurel vs Emily lol.
Pages