the real fact is that they were there and know what happened while no one on this forum was...end of story everything else is just opinions based on the lawsuit...and opinions are not facts...I just think we all need to stop pretending like we no what happened.
You're right, we don't know what happened but Susie and Sarah re-opened the topic by addressing it on their podcast. We're simply following their lead and expressing our opinions on a discussion forum. There's nothing wrong with that. If you disagree with what has been said, fair enough. But that doesn't give you, Sarah, Susie or anyone else grounds to tell people they can't talk about this.
the real fact is that they were there and know what happened while no one on this forum was...end of story everything else is just opinions based on the lawsuit...and opinions are not facts...I just think we all need to stop pretending like we no what happened.
You're right, we don't know what happened but Susie and Sarah re-opened the topic by addressing it on their podcast. We're simply following their lead and expressing our opinions on a discussion forum. There's nothing wrong with that. If you disagree with what has been said, fair enough. But that doesn't give you, Sarah, Susie or anyone else grounds to tell people they can't talk about this.
I just want to add Bananas is hardly the type of person whose word you should trust when it comes to sexual and/or aggressive behaviour. His own misconduct aside, he also supports the likes of Tony, who on this season alone, has behaved horribly. *** naked in Jessica's bed after she told him she's not interested, corners Camilla in the middle of a heated argument wherein multiple men had to pry him off of her, made violent threats against her prior to that, had the audacity to laugh about it on the after show wherein he implied she asked for it, so on and so forth. According to Bananas, though, Tony is one of the most deserving kids to be on the show. Smh.
I just want to add Bananas is hardly the type of person whose word you should trust when it comes to sexual and/or aggressive behaviour. His own misconduct aside, he also supports the likes of Tony, who on this season alone, has behaved horribly. *** naked in Jessica's bed after she told him she's not interested, corners Camilla in the middle of a heated argument wherein multiple men had to pry him off of her, made violent threats against her prior to that, had the audacity to laugh about it on the after show wherein he implied she asked for it, so on and so forth. According to Bananas, though, Tony is one of the most deserving kids to be on the show. Smh.
Well I mean Tony is his newest addition to his cult so of course he's going to say that. Bet it'd be a whole different story if he wasn't up his *** or a woman.
Well I mean Tony is his newest addition to his cult so of course he's going to say that. Bet it'd be a whole different story if he wasn't up his *** or a woman.
Same thing with Sarah. The situation with Tonya was a "sexual misconduct" while she think Nia sexually ***ualted Jordan.
I can't stand when they promote a challenge podcast but there's barely anything challenge related on the podcast. Everyone I have listened too is such a letdown in regards to "secrets" and good gossip.
Well I mean Tony is his newest addition to his cult so of course he's going to say that. Bet it'd be a whole different story if he wasn't up his *** or a woman.
Same thing with Sarah. The situation with Tonya was a "sexual misconduct" while she think Nia sexually ***ualted Jordan.
Technically, Nia did sexually ***ault Jordan. She touched his **** through his pants without his consent. Was it aggressive in nature? No. Could he have moved or done something to establish boundaries? Yes. But let's not get definitions confused. That said, Sarah admitted on that same episode of the podcast that she is influenced by her allies/friends on the challenge, to the point that she finds herself laughing along and supporting them when they mistreat people. The whole episode was so incriminating and unnecessary to be honest. I understand Susie and Sarah are just shooting the shit and recording it for us to listen to, but they have to understand it's important to think their dialogue through and be very clear/unabashedly confident when it comes to matters that can be labeled criminal.
Technically, Nia did sexually assault Jordan. She touched his **** through his pants without his consent. Was it aggressive in nature? No. Could he have moved or done something to establish boundaries? Yes. But let's not get definitions confused. That said, Sarah admitted on that same episode of the podcast that she is influenced by her allies/friends on the challenge, to the point that she finds herself laughing along and supporting them when they mistreat people. The whole episode was so incriminating and unnecessary to be honest. I understand Susie and Sarah are just shooting the shit and recording it for us to listen to, but they have to understand it's important to think their dialogue through and be very clear/unabashedly confident when it comes to matters that can be labeled criminal.
That's not what I'm saying. Like you said it could be considered assault but everyone around including Jordan didn't think it was that serious and they've even hung out since that was filmed. I'm just talking about how she was talking shit about Nia a month or so ago while going on this "Kenny is Innocent" campaign.
Debut Album wrote:Well I mean Tony is his newest addition to his cult so of course he's going to say that. Bet it'd be a whole different story if he wasn't up his *** or a woman.
Same thing with Sarah. The situation with Tonya was a "sexual misconduct" while she think Nia sexually ***ualted Jordan.
Technically, Nia did sexually ***ault Jordan. She touched his **** through his pants without his consent. Was it aggressive in nature? No. Could he have moved or done something to establish boundaries? Yes. But let's not get definitions confused. That said, Sarah admitted on that same episode of the podcast that she is influenced by her allies/friends on the challenge, to the point that she finds herself laughing along and supporting them when they mistreat people. The whole episode was so incriminating and unnecessary to be honest. I understand Susie and Sarah are just shooting the shit and recording it for us to listen to, but they have to understand it's important to think their dialogue through and be very clear/unabashedly confident when it comes to matters that can be labeled criminal.
Technically, Nia did sexually assault Jordan. She touched his **** through his pants without his consent. Was it aggressive in nature? No. Could he have moved or done something to establish boundaries? Yes. But let's not get definitions confused. That said, Sarah admitted on that same episode of the podcast that she is influenced by her allies/friends on the challenge, to the point that she finds herself laughing along and supporting them when they mistreat people. The whole episode was so incriminating and unnecessary to be honest. I understand Susie and Sarah are just shooting the shit and recording it for us to listen to, but they have to understand it's important to think their dialogue through and be very clear/unabashedly confident when it comes to matters that can be labeled criminal.
That's not what I'm saying. Like you said it could be considered assault but everyone around including Jordan didn't think it was that serious and they've even hung out since that was filmed. I'm just talking about how she was talking shit about Nia a month or so ago while going on this "Kenny is Innocent" campaign.
Absolutely. Sarah's judgment is just as skewed as Bananas' in that regard.
You see "sexual misconduct" all the time on the shit show. I mean that type of behavior is encouraged as grapefruit outlined earlier. Another of countless examples - Bananas jumped into the bathtub while Janelle was naked on Inferno 3. I'm not really sure how one differentiates that from what happened to Tonya. The fact is none of us really know.
Okay we don't know what happened but clearly something did happen and people keep changing stories. If all they're going to do is dance around it and not tell the truth then why even talk about it? Shut the **** up about it and keep it moving.
And I'm aware that they more than likely can't say what happend due to legal reasons but my point still stands.
You see "sexual misconduct" all the time on the shit show. I mean that type of behavior is encouraged as grapefruit outlined earlier. Another of countless examples - Bananas jumped into the bathtub while Janelle was naked on Inferno 3. I'm not really sure how one differentiates that from what happened to Tonya. The fact is none of us really know.
the difference is.... Tonya sued ****. Didn't think that was a tough concept to grasp. And instead of spending hundreds of thousands on the case on some nut job they would never cast again, they settle it out of court and move on.
Susie and Sarah want people to pay for there podcast now like are they on crack why would you pay monthly to listen. https://www.patreon.com/user
They must be out of their minds. Ain't nobody about to pay for that shit.
Sadly people would lol
Just like they gave her money for the rivals podcast. Until this day I still dont get why they needed that money? They do it in Sarah's living room and through her laptop.
RLK2014 wrote:Susie and Sarah want people to pay for there podcast now like are they on crack why would you pay monthly to listen. https://www.patreon.com/user
They must be out of their minds. Ain't nobody about to pay for that shit.
Sadly people would lolJust like they gave her money for the rivals podcast. Until this day I still dont get why they needed that money? They do it in Sarah's living room and through her laptop.
Yeah. When I typed that I remember people gave them money to drink wine with them..such a **** waste of money.
It's not like either is hurting for money and Susie husband does that stuff for a living so it isn't that much work. Like rivals they were like oh we will have all these guests hey have had mark and Sarah
You're right, we don't know what happened but Susie and Sarah re-opened the topic by addressing it on their podcast. We're simply following their lead and expressing our opinions on a discussion forum. There's nothing wrong with that. If you disagree with what has been said, fair enough. But that doesn't give you, Sarah, Susie or anyone else grounds to tell people they can't talk about this.
Exactly. You can't tell me to stop talking about something when the people involved can't even stick to one story.
I just want to add Bananas is hardly the type of person whose word you should trust when it comes to sexual and/or aggressive behaviour. His own misconduct aside, he also supports the likes of Tony, who on this season alone, has behaved horribly. *** naked in Jessica's bed after she told him she's not interested, corners Camilla in the middle of a heated argument wherein multiple men had to pry him off of her, made violent threats against her prior to that, had the audacity to laugh about it on the after show wherein he implied she asked for it, so on and so forth. According to Bananas, though, Tony is one of the most deserving kids to be on the show. Smh.
Well I mean Tony is his newest addition to his cult so of course he's going to say that. Bet it'd be a whole different story if he wasn't up his *** or a woman.
Same thing with Sarah. The situation with Tonya was a "sexual misconduct" while she think Nia sexually ***ualted Jordan.
I can't stand when they promote a challenge podcast but there's barely anything challenge related on the podcast. Everyone I have listened too is such a letdown in regards to "secrets" and good gossip.
Technically, Nia did sexually ***ault Jordan. She touched his **** through his pants without his consent. Was it aggressive in nature? No. Could he have moved or done something to establish boundaries? Yes. But let's not get definitions confused. That said, Sarah admitted on that same episode of the podcast that she is influenced by her allies/friends on the challenge, to the point that she finds herself laughing along and supporting them when they mistreat people. The whole episode was so incriminating and unnecessary to be honest. I understand Susie and Sarah are just shooting the shit and recording it for us to listen to, but they have to understand it's important to think their dialogue through and be very clear/unabashedly confident when it comes to matters that can be labeled criminal.
That's not what I'm saying. Like you said it could be considered assault but everyone around including Jordan didn't think it was that serious and they've even hung out since that was filmed. I'm just talking about how she was talking shit about Nia a month or so ago while going on this "Kenny is Innocent" campaign.
Hmmmm......Interesting.
Absolutely. Sarah's judgment is just as skewed as Bananas' in that regard.
You see "sexual misconduct" all the time on the shit show. I mean that type of behavior is encouraged as grapefruit outlined earlier. Another of countless examples - Bananas jumped into the bathtub while Janelle was naked on Inferno 3. I'm not really sure how one differentiates that from what happened to Tonya. The fact is none of us really know.
Okay we don't know what happened but clearly something did happen and people keep changing stories. If all they're going to do is dance around it and not tell the truth then why even talk about it? Shut the **** up about it and keep it moving.
And I'm aware that they more than likely can't say what happend due to legal reasons but my point still stands.
the difference is.... Tonya sued ****. Didn't think that was a tough concept to grasp. And instead of spending hundreds of thousands on the case on some nut job they would never cast again, they settle it out of court and move on.
Susie and Sarah want people to pay for there podcast now like are they on crack why would you pay monthly to listen.
https://www.patreon.com/user
They must be out of their minds. Ain't nobody about to pay for that shit.
Sadly people would lol
Just like they gave her money for the rivals podcast. Until this day I still dont get why they needed that money? They do it in Sarah's living room and through her laptop.
Yeah. When I typed that I remember people gave them money to drink wine with them..such a **** waste of money.
It's not like either is hurting for money and Susie husband does that stuff for a living so it isn't that much work. Like rivals they were like oh we will have all these guests hey have had mark and Sarah
$92 per month? If these old******* don't sit down. With that kind of money they better rent out a studio, build a set, and air that shit on TV.
Thiefs. Malandros.
Did I see that right? They want 92 dollars for a ******* podcast?
Sarah is just.....whyyyyyy couldn't Nia just hit her instead of touching Jordan?
image.png
image.png
"A signed page out of Sarah's doodle journal"
"Access to the Brain Candy Book Club"
"A t-shirt/wine glass/coffee mug for $100"
I want to throw apples at both of them.
After reading this whoever give them a cent is a ******* lol
Screenshot_2016-07-08-18-28-13-1.png
Screenshot_2016-07-08-18-28-54-1.png
Screenshot_2016-07-08-18-29-15-1.png
Screenshot_2016-07-08-18-29-19-1.png
Screenshot_2016-07-08-18-29-31-1.png
"We will follow you on Twitter"
*****......this can't be real life right now.
And then they only do the shit once a month? Smfh....
Sadly if you like only 4 more 100 per month things are left meaning someone bought 1
Pages