[QUOTE=TheFeedMachi;350172]Camila walking into the pool was a great gif.[/QUOTE]
Yeah I'll admit that was a good gif..Not only that but I think that's the only remotely entertaining thing she's done on these things.
[QUOTE=Fresh Meat;350186]Her constant meltdowns on each challenge are pretty entertaining. She's the perfect mix for these shows: great competitor and brings drama.[/QUOTE]
I remember when somebody on here(as much as i remember) a long time ago i think during Cuttroath said how she is reality tv gold and should be on every challenge untill they get cancelled.Really cursed her on that one
[QUOTE=Fresh Meat;350186]Her constant meltdowns on each challenge are pretty entertaining. She's the perfect mix for these shows: great competitor and brings drama.[/QUOTE]
I loved her ripping Big Easy a new one on BotS. I don't know if I'm in the minority here, but I think he deserved it. She's one of my favorite competitors.
[QUOTE=Meelz;350277]I loved her ripping Big Easy a new one on BotS. I don't know if I'm in the minority here, but I think [B]he deserved it[/B]. She's one of my favorite competitors.[/QUOTE]
Unlucky choice of words here and there but 100%ly deserved...
[QUOTE=Meelz;350277]I loved her ripping Big Easy a new one on BotS. I don't know if I'm in the minority here, but I think he deserved it. She's one of my favorite competitors.[/QUOTE]
Yep he did deserve it..But Camilla deserved to lose so it evens out methinks.
[QUOTE=Debut Album;350288]Yep he did deserve it..But Camilla deserved to lose so it evens out methinks.[/QUOTE]
I hate the edit Big E always gets especially on Cuttroath they made it seem like he was this good competitor that kept going in for no reason when in reality he cost ten people 30 000 dollars and deserved what Camila told him ,only time i felt bad for him was when Laurel yelled at him
[QUOTE=goodgirl;350293]I hate the edit Big E always gets especially on Cuttroath they made it seem like he was this good competitor that kept going in for no reason when in reality he cost ten people 30 000 dollars and deserved what Camila told him ,only time i felt bad for him was when Laurel yelled at him[/QUOTE]
He cost a lot of people money on Gauntlet 3 certainly even after claiming they could rely on him no matter what. I had to give props to Brad for at least trying to help him when no one else would during the Final.
According to Laurel, there is much more that lead up to that exchange that was not shown but she still feels like she stepped over a line. wishes she had told her side of the story in a confessional and apologized to Easy.
[QUOTE=Desertpuma;350294]He cost a lot of people money on Gauntlet 3 certainly even after claiming they could rely on him no matter what. I had to give props to Brad for at least trying to help him when no one else would during the Final.
According to Laurel, there is much more that lead up to that exchange that was not shown but she still feels like she stepped over a line. wishes she had told her side of the story in a confessional and apologized to Easy.[/QUOTE]
She explained her side on the podcast one time and her side sounded stupid imo, it was apparently because Eric said she couldn't sit with him and the guys, like really? Laurel just likes to go after the weak. At least Camilla's rant was a little justified, she was understandably frustrated and lots of people have yelled at their partners when frustrated. And people are edited like that on purpose, if you noticed they always try to show them saying something cocky then failing right after saying it, lol its kinda mean actually, I remember Preston saying something confident then he fails horribly at the 1st challenge.
From what I understand there was more than that and that she was quite drunk so she may not remember all of it. Somewhere on youtube is the aftermath that never made it on the show and involves Dan ranting about it.
Note to self: if by some miracle I land on a Challenge, never make bold predictions I cannot back up.
[QUOTE=Debut Album;350288]Yep he did deserve it..But Camilla deserved to lose so it evens out methinks.[/QUOTE]
Yes, the second best female on that season deserved to lose.
How does one "deserve" to win or lose? The very concept seems incredibly stupid to me. Winning on merit us all that can possibly matter when the competition is fair and not skewed for political correctness.
[QUOTE=Fresh Meat;350330]I was talking about Battle of the Seasons and Sarah would be the best girl that season.[/QUOTE]
I think Camila is better than Sarah and that is based on what castmembers have said
[QUOTE=goodgirl;350331]I think Camila is better than Sarah and that is based on what castmembers have said[/QUOTE]
I kinda wanna agree with this. But that "Bob Marley" moment...
[QUOTE=Meelz;350335]I kinda wanna agree with this. But that "Bob Marley" moment...[/QUOTE]
Come on:) That was just a joke...She had absolutely no clue and said something;
[QUOTE=V1man;350327]How does one "deserve" to win or lose? The very concept seems incredibly stupid to me. Winning on merit us all that can possibly matter when the competition is fair and not skewed for political correctness.[/QUOTE]
Nobody has really given any merit winning recently. It's all just been handed on a silver platter. There's no real strategic gameplay.
[QUOTE=V1man;350327]How does one "deserve" to win or lose? The very concept seems incredibly stupid to me. Winning on merit us all that can possibly matter when the competition is fair and not skewed for political correctness.[/QUOTE]
How's it stupid, V1. It is what it is. No deep thinking should be required...
[QUOTE=Nostalgic;350427]How's it stupid, V1. It is what it is. No deep thinking should be required...[/QUOTE]
"It is what it is" ranks right along side of "deserves," in my opinion. Nonetheless I'll respond.
To espouse the person "X" is more deserving than person "Y" suggests there need be no competition at all. MTV can simply take a vote when the cast is announced and potential viewers may select the most deserving cast member who will then be awarded the winner's share check and MTV can save the costs of producing the challenge.
The "deserving" argument began in one of the early seasons of Survivor (and perhaps in season 1 of BB as well) with arguments that because of someone perceived poverty or other circumstance, someone was more "deserving" than a statistically better player who was wealthy or had a successful, ongoing career. It's neither an intelligent (See definition of "stupid") approach to game play, nor does it comport with the principals of the Game Show Act which are cited in the cast contract.
Pages