[QUOTE=Inglorious;305114]When Jasmine gets drunk and crazy, Rashida is her alter ego who comes out and tears the house apart. I'd love to see Rashida and Marry get into it.[/QUOTE]
*****. Why Jasmine why does your alter ego have to have a ghetto name? And yeah I would like to see that myself.
[QUOTE=FishHooks;305091]On that we agree. The guy seems way to shady for me. While I have distaste for several members of the talent pool due to their behavior, he is the one person who creeps me out the most just by his mere presence.[/QUOTE]
Yah. Especially the whole percocet incident.
[QUOTE=Nostalgic;305115]LMFAO. Why Jasmine why does your alter ego have to have a ghetto name? And yeah I would like to see that myself.[/QUOTE]
I think that is part of the charm of Rashida. ;)
[QUOTE=Inglorious;305116]Yah. Especially the whole percocet incident.[/QUOTE]
Okay, and that has to do with what? He hasn't done anything a trifle as some of the other **** that goes down on these show that we've been over a million times
[QUOTE=FishHooks;305091]On that we agree. The guy seems way to shady for me. While I have distaste for several members of the talent pool due to their behavior, he is the one person who creeps me out the most just by his mere presence.[/QUOTE]
Enlighten me, how? Knight was the most intriguing.
[QUOTE=Nostalgic;305130]Okay, and that has to do with what? He hasn't done anything a trifle as some of the other **** that goes down on these show that we've been over a million times
Enlighten me, how? Knight was the most intriguing.[/QUOTE]
I think it's safe to say that the community here has a wide variety of opinions about Knight, and every other cast member to appear on any show. Some situations may turn people off to cast members while others may be more sympathetic. And that's okay. (except if it's Johnny, then we all dislike him. Kidding. :p)
Personally, I'm not a fan of what we've seen of him (Knight) on his Real World season, but if he happens to appear on the next challenge, I'd like to see how he'll act in that environment and if he's a good competitor. I've never really been one to 'dislike' someone because of how they've appeared on a heavily edited reality television show. I've disliked actions, but never the person as a whole.
With that said, I've been tossing around ideas for a new challenge format. Representatives from past challenges in a couples format based on who won and who lost? That'd be oddly specific and incredibly difficult to cast. How about a challenge dealing with elimination records? People who've won paired up with people who've never won or haven't appeared in any? Same *** or opposite ***. Or team based. Team based could be potentially lopsided though. How about... people who were invited to Brad and Tori's wedding versus the people who weren't? ....Okay, that was mostly joking (Although that'd be hilarious).
[QUOTE=Nostalgic;305130]Okay, and that has to do with what? He hasn't done anything a trifle as some of the other **** that goes down on these show that we've been over a million times
Enlighten me, how? Knight was the most [COLOR="Red"]intriguing[/COLOR].[/QUOTE]
Please explain this.
Secondly, just because other cast members did other bad things, it doesn't excuse or exonerate Knight.
Remember when the percocet disappeared? People directly asked him if he took one, but Knight couldn't give a straight answer. How is that not shady?
[QUOTE=IWhipMyHair;305148]What month is everybody predicting they leave for the challenge? For sure either June/July?[/QUOTE]
I would say June since they're already done with St.Thomas filming.
[QUOTE=Inglorious;305142]Please explain this.
Secondly, just because other cast members did other bad things, it doesn't excuse or exonerate Knight.
Remember when the percocet disappeared? People directly asked him if he took one, but Knight couldn't give a straight answer. How is that not shady?[/QUOTE]
Its not shady. If he did do it a thief is a thief. And when exactly did I say he should be exonerated?
[QUOTE=Inglorious;305142]Please explain this.
Secondly, just because other cast members did other bad things, it doesn't excuse or exonerate Knight.
Remember when the percocet disappeared? People directly asked him if he took one, but Knight couldn't give a straight answer. [B]How is that not shady?[/B][/QUOTE]
It is good TV, that is all.
While I don't particularly care for the guy, Knight was under no legal obligation to respond in any way to the question what was asked of him during the episode. Further, we have no idea what was actually said during the taping or apart from the taping. Everything we know is at the mercy of the producers who were clearly doing their very best to get some drama out of a season largely devoid of the kinds of drama that had made many previous seasons popular.
Given what we know of the allegations of theft and/or use of drugs on both RW and the Challenges, this alleged incident seems rather rather mild in comparison.
[QUOTE=V1man;304943]It could also mean countless other things.
1) Are there no doctors in Nebraska qualified to administer a physical exam? Of course there are.
2) The MMPI can be administered by qualified psychologists. There are a bunch in Nebraska, according to my friend, Google. Maybe Brooke La Barbara could travel around the country next time as a consultant and do them for BMP.
[B]The above is not to suggest that Carley is not on the next challenge. I have no idea. [/B] I don't think, however, that BMP wastes its precious coin to unnecessarily fly someone to/from LA. There is nothing in the casting process for any reality show that can't be done remotely or by FedEx except when the production company doesn't know the potential cast member. Clearly they know Carley.[/QUOTE]
It is also entirely possible that BMP has a group rate contract for the MMPI, although I can't imagine flying people to Burbank from Vegas and Alliance, NE makes fiscal sense. I'm on the fence with this one. It also seems a little late in the process, unless there are some replacements/alternates being cast.
Hey V1man. Been a huge fan of yours for a long time when I was just lurking around in the forums. Thanks for directly replying to me. :)
And I understand what you are saying. We get a very heavily edited depiction of the events that transpired. However, Knight not directly answering those questions still raises red flags for me. That is just my personal opinion.
And other people doing worst things doesn't lessen the seriousness of what Knight allegedly did. I don't think the theory of relativity should be applied here because I can conversely pick other people who have never done anything that I perceived to be wrong to compare Knight to.
@Nostalgic I think we just have different working definitions of shady going on here. To me, if someone were to steal, make it seem like someone else did it, and slink away when asked about it, that is shady to me. Thieves are shady to me.
[url=http://vevmo.com/vbimghost.php?do=displayimg&imgid=13586][img]http://vevmo.com/imagehosting/18234fb69dc53350b.png[/img][/url]
[url=http://vevmo.com/vbimghost.php?do=displayimg&imgid=13587][img]http://vevmo.com/imagehosting/18234fb69dd060344.png[/img][/url]
[url=http://vevmo.com/vbimghost.php?do=displayimg&imgid=13588][img]http://vevmo.com/imagehosting/18234fb69dda4fdc8.png[/img][/url]
Some St. Thomas cast members were headed to New York this morning for something. Could be a taping for an aftershow, digital extension etc, but could be for some testing...
[QUOTE=V1man;305216]It is also entirely possible that BMP has a group rate contract for the MMPI, although I can't imagine flying people to Burbank from Vegas and Alliance, NE makes fiscal sense. I'm on the fence with this one. It also seems a little late in the process, unless there are some replacements/alternates being cast.[/QUOTE]
Or they have an appearance in NE?
[url=http://omahanightlife.com/articles/51812-kilts]Come party with the Real World Stars at Kilts[/url]
[QUOTE=V1man;305216]It is also entirely possible that BMP has a group rate contract for the MMPI, although I can't imagine flying people to Burbank from Vegas and Alliance, NE makes fiscal sense. I'm on the fence with this one. It also seems a little late in the process, unless there are some replacements/alternates being cast.[/QUOTE]
I wondered about the timing as well. It seems as though some people did their "testing" last week in LA, but I guess there could be numerous reasons as to why Carley could have possibly did her testing this week; a replacement because someone didnt pass their evaluations? replacement because someone dropped out? maybe she couldnt make it for the intended date and they gave her a unique date? maybe there are multiple dates people could attend?
Not really sure, but I do think it is a strong possibility that she could be on. She left NE on Tuesday and was back in NE on Wednesday. You would think if she were visiting she would stay longer, or if she were to go see somebody she would have went to Vegas, where she previously lived.
Idk probably wishful thinking on my part because I love Carley and would love to see her do another challenge.
But based on who is speculated so far, to me it sounds like a Rookies vs. Veterans type of season rather than a partner format or battle of the seasons.
[QUOTE=TSPKM2;305281]I wondered about the timing as well. It seems as though some people did their "testing" last week in LA, but I guess there could be numerous reasons as to why Carley could have possibly did her testing this week; a replacement because someone didnt pass their evaluations? replacement because someone dropped out? maybe she couldnt make it for the intended date and they gave her a unique date? maybe there are multiple dates people could attend?
Not really sure, but I do think it is a strong possibility that she could be on. She left NE on Tuesday and was back in NE on Wednesday. You would think if she were visiting she would stay longer, or if she were to go see somebody she would have went to Vegas, where she previously lived.
Idk probably wishful thinking on my part because I love Carley and would love to see her do another challenge.
But based on who is speculated so far, to me it sounds like a Rookies vs. Veterans type of season rather than a partner format or battle of the seasons.[/QUOTE]
I actually wouldn't mind if Carley was on though I cracked myself up at her Laurel amazon diss from awhile back, lol. She's nice.
As for Rookies vs. Veterans we had that 3 times already. I actually hope thats not the case.
Also going along with what FishHooks is saying that would be different and cool for once if they had teams who didn't see each other.
I would love to see teams isolated from each other when not competing. My guess would be though that keeping the pool of people divided up (i.e. different waves and fast in and out flights) is probably an effort to crack down on spoilers. I've wondered if MTV banning Adam Royer has to do more with his utter inability to not tweet things like his Challenge outfits and pretty obvious spoilers the second he leaves a show and his friends are just as bad. A whole different cast would likely cut off the loose lips. Some spoilers that have gotten out are clearly from people on the show IMHO.
[QUOTE=Nostalgic;305292]I actually wouldn't mind if Carley was on though I cracked myself up at her Laurel amazon diss from awhile back, lol. She's nice.
[B]As for Rookies vs. Veterans we had that 3 times already. I actually hope thats not the case. [/B]
Also going along with what FishHooks is saying that would be different and cool for once if they had teams who didn't see each other.[/QUOTE]
Gauntlet 2, Gauntlet 3? only twice.
sometimes themes like that just work...if they keep trying other things they will end up too gimicky and will be stupid. I think they should stick to things that work.
[QUOTE=TSPKM2;305317]Gauntlet 2, Gauntlet 3? only twice.
sometimes themes like that just work...if they keep trying other things they will end up too gimicky and will be stupid. I think they should stick to things that work.[/QUOTE]
The Ruins was about as close to Rookies vs. Vets as you can get without being Gauntlet 4.
[QUOTE=VCR14;305233]
Some St. Thomas cast members were headed to New York this morning for something. Could be a taping for an aftershow, digital extension etc, but could be for some testing...[/QUOTE]
That awkward moment when You've been in The Mansion 100 times
[QUOTE=salt&vinegar;305318]The Ruins was about as close to Rookies vs. Vets as you can get without being Gauntlet 4.[/QUOTE]
I disagree. Half of the Challenger team were veterans.
[QUOTE=TSPKM2;305322]I disagree. Half of the Challenger team were veterans.[/QUOTE]
Actually, only 5 people of the challengers team had been on 2+ challenges prior to ruins.
EDIT: I forgot Dunbar, that makes 6 and thta's pretty much half. My bad, shoot me now.
[QUOTE=TSPKM2;305322]I disagree. Half of the Challenger team were veterans.[/QUOTE]
I never said it was Rookies vs. Vets, I said it was as close to it as you could get without actually being rookies vs. vets.
[QUOTE=salt&vinegar;305324]I never said it was Rookies vs. Vets, I said it was as close to it as you could get without actually being rookies vs. vets.[/QUOTE]
It could have been....but it wasn't...but any challenge could have been close to rooks vs vets with the right casting.
Doesn't matter anyway, doesn't really matter what we want or think...the format/cast has been chosen, its about finding out what and who now.
Pages