Before the challenges are over for good we need to see a battle of the sexes 3. It seems like every season of the RW theres this boys vs. girls theme and im tired of it, and then on the challenges, its the theme of the show.
I don't even care if the girls lose at this point, it would be just nice to see the girls sticking together and not being on the boys side. No casting Johannas, Caseys, Paulas..all alpha females.
And I think BMP could put together a realistic cast like Rachel, Emily (DC), Ayiiia, Kelly Anne, Susie, Evelynn, Ruthie, etc.
If they put in most of those girls and maybe only one or two of JEK's pawns, theres no way the other girls would let the guys control the team. IDK, its just something that needs to happen.
[QUOTE=Lamb Chop!!!;158700]I don't think that'll ever happen. Apparently the concept of Battle of the Sexes is copyrighted and MTV doesn't want to have to pay for the rights...[/QUOTE]
IMO, it would be a ratings win.
[QUOTE=Npresh24;158712]So instead of BOTS they could do a Ruins 2 with a Male Team and Female Team. with 14 men and 14 women[/QUOTE]
Worst idea ever, I guess for the sake of completing a trilogy like they have with Inferno and Gauntlet they should do BOTS, but change the elimination up. No one wants to go on a show where they get voted off rather than competing to stay. Like TJ said though, they'd have to be really strong girls on there. I'd throw in Jodi, Kina, Jillian in that mix as well, even though Jodi and Kina stated they've retired. I think they should do an Inferno vs Gauntlet theme. Where it's the winners of Inferno 3 and losers of the final team vs the winners of Gauntlet 3 and losers of the final team. Since Ev and Kenny were on both shows, they'd be on the Inferno team because they won that challenge, so they'd have to get someone who was eliminated earlier from the Inferno to replace them on that team. Which ever team wins the challenge of the day, they get to pick if they want to have an Inferno or a Gauntlet for the elimination that day. A little entertaining eh?
I still think BMP slept on casting for FM2. The whole entire cancun cast minus Derek and CJ should of been on FM2. Crossing my fingers for a Gauntlet 4 with Emilee as a cast member getting sent home first, before someone like Casey. tehehehe.
[QUOTE=r3iKo;158725]Worst idea ever, I guess for the sake of completing a trilogy like they have with Inferno and Gauntlet they should do BOTS, but change the elimination up. No one wants to go on a show where they get voted off rather than competing to stay. [B]Like TJ said though, they'd have to be really strong girls on there. I'd throw in Jodi, Kina, Jillian in that mix as well, even though Jodi and Kina stated they've retired. [/B]I think they should do an Inferno vs Gauntlet theme. Where it's the winners of Inferno 3 and losers of the final team vs the winners of Gauntlet 3 and losers of the final team. Since Ev and Kenny were on both shows, they'd be on the Inferno team because they won that challenge, so they'd have to get someone who was eliminated earlier from the Inferno to replace them on that team. Which ever team wins the challenge of the day, they get to pick if they want to have an Inferno or a Gauntlet for the elimination that day. A little entertaining eh?[/QUOTE]
Thats why I named some realistic, unretired cast members.
[QUOTE=tjhallow;158768]Thats why I named some realistic, unretired cast members.[/QUOTE]
I know, I agree with you 100%. I was just saying. Also Gauntlet 4 should never happen
I think they could safely do a variation on Ruins 2 but instead while each team is competing to win, each team member is competing to survive within their own team via points. While similar to the BOTS, it could be a mix of male & female on each team and choosing missions where it does not always rely on those categories that play to men's strengths. I believe on one of the BOTS, the girls complained there was no cooking challenge or something.
[QUOTE=r3iKo;158792]I know, I agree with you 100%. I was just saying. Also Gauntlet 4 should never happen[/QUOTE]
Out of all the old formats, that is the one thats MOST likely to happen again because of all the new rookies. Cancun, DC, FM2, and Brooklyn, yeah I'd say the next challenge could possibly be a vets vs. rookies format.
And all the Gauntlets were entertaining and had good ratings actually so I could see it happening.
[QUOTE=tjhallow;158806]Out of all the old formats, that is the one thats MOST likely to happen again because of all the new rookies. Cancun, DC, FM2, and Brooklyn, yeah I'd say the next challenge could possibly be a vets vs. rookies format.
And all the Gauntlets were entertaining and had good ratings actually so I could see it happening.[/QUOTE]
Well why not the Inferno? They can Lose the Good Guys/Bad ***** thing and The Gauntlet doesn't really have to be Rookies Vs Veterans. They can do something new with those formats(really that's the only reasons I would support them doing a 4th of either show)
[QUOTE=tjhallow;158696][B]Before the challenges are over for good we need to see a battle of the sexes 3. It seems like every season of the RW theres this boys vs. girls theme and im tired of it, and then on the challenges, its the theme of the show.[/B]
I don't even care if the girls lose at this point, it would be just nice to see the girls sticking together and not being on the boys side. No casting Johannas, Caseys, Paulas..all alpha females.
And I think BMP could put together a realistic cast like Rachel, Emily (DC), Ayiiia, Kelly Anne, Susie, Evelynn, Ruthie, etc.
If they put in most of those girls and maybe only one or two of JEK's pawns, theres no way the other girls would let the guys control the team. IDK, its just something that needs to happen.[/QUOTE]
Yeah I would like to see Another Battle of the Sexes Only to see an all guys team.
[QUOTE=Debut Album;158819]Well why not the Inferno? They can Lose the Good Guys/Bad ***** thing and The Gauntlet doesn't really have to be Rookies Vs Veterans. They can do something new with those formats(really that's the only reasons I would support them doing a 4th of either show)[/QUOTE]
Well what format do you suggest?
Good guys vs. bad ***** wouldn't work regardless because hardly any of the alumni are "good guys" anymore.
I don't see what the issue is with a G4 or an I4, its been a long time and I think they would do well.
The Island was flop, D2 wasn't that bad but once again the alliance screwed the whole entire concept of the game ( everyone for themselves, which wasn't the case), and no matter how you spin it, champs vs. challengers will always be lopsided.
The problem with a good guys vs. bad ***** concept is that I couldn't take it seriously, but I think they could find a way to make even teams. I2 and 13 were actually pretty even in my opinion.
[QUOTE=Debut Album;158820]Yeah I would like to see Another Battle of the Sexes Only to see an all guys team.[/QUOTE]
It wouldn't be called "battle of the sexes" then.
The Duel 2 worked on some levels. The only problems I had with it were that the alliance dominated which I think was due to the skill level of the people who weren't the alliance was mcu lower and the best teamed up together. As well as the fact that they had to team up together which is the oppostie of what the duel was. The final mission should have never had Rachel finish first or have people wait for the females to keep up. It should definately be all about how you are as an individual competitor.
[QUOTE=mr.unamazing;159018]The Duel 2 worked on some levels. The only problems I had with it were that the alliance dominated which I think was due to the skill level of the people who weren't the alliance was mcu lower and the best teamed up together. As well as the fact that they had to team up together which is the oppostie of what the duel was. The final mission should have never had Rachel finish first or have people wait for the females to keep up. It should definately be all about how you are as an individual competitor.[/QUOTE]
Doesn't matter anymore, the game has been figured out, and the last three challenges have shown it. They need to switch everything up.
And D2 didn't work, it was the boys alliance and the girls alliance in the final.
[QUOTE=tjhallow;159012]It wouldn't be called "battle of the sexes" then.[/QUOTE]
Oh no that's not what I meant you misunderstood me.
I didn't mean that I wanted there to be ALL guys on battle of the sexes I'm saying that I would watch it just to see an all male team there still would be girls vs guys but I wouldn't care about the girls since they would most likely lose anyway.
I always like new challenges and new ideas are the best after the last couple of challenges. I personnally like the teams of two and hope that Fresh Meat is better. I personnally would like to see a challenge with 3 teams of around ten. Where the best 2 teams compete in the final. Or even a challenge with 3/4 member teams but only have 2 members compete in challenges but all 3/4 would compete in eliminations.
I think we need a challenge where there is [B]no voting.[/B]
Have all the challenges in heat format, and the bottom two teams (or individuals) faceoff in whatever endgame battle there is in a given week.
I'm personally tired of half the episodes being about the cast trying to memorize the voting order that they came up with the day they walked in the house...
There would still be strategy and it would be a lot less predictable.
That seems fair so it will probably never happen. That I think would work well. Though to me watching the lowest 2 teams perform agianst could work I would like for a chance for massive upsets. So they could have the 2 lowest or my proposal of having the lowest automatically going in and then they pick who ever they want. No voting.
[QUOTE=Bacchus;159026]I think we need a challenge where there is [B]no voting.[/B]
Have all the challenges in heat format, and the bottom two teams (or individuals) faceoff in whatever endgame battle there is in a given week.
I'm personally tired of half the episodes being about the cast trying to memorize the voting order that they came up with the day they walked in the house...
There would still be strategy and it would be a lot less predictable.[/QUOTE]
This is exactly why they need to move back to the Battle format, even with pairs like Seasons where the fate of the team is done by points earned.
[QUOTE=Bacchus;159026]I think we need a challenge where there is [B]no voting.[/B]
Have all the challenges in heat format, and the bottom two teams (or individuals) faceoff in whatever endgame battle there is in a given week.
I'm personally tired of half the episodes being about the cast trying to memorize the voting order that they came up with the day they walked in the house...
There would still be strategy and it would be a lot less predictable.[/QUOTE]
Yeah that's a good Idea. They could throw in a Scoreboard in there to determine where everyone's at.
I think if they did that it couldn't be cumulative. Because in Battle of the Seasons and Battle of the sexes there was always a team that would never have a chance of getting into the inner circle but they were still in. I don't know if BMP would ever do that.
Not only is this a good idea, but it could help both J.S. and The RW/RR Challenges. The only reason why I'm posting is because my local radio station were talking about it. They all said it would be a good idea and they wanted to see more of Jwows ***** haha.
I'm not sure but I think I heard that Ronnie, Mike, and Jwow are fans of the challenges, and that they tried out for the Real World.
Mostly all my friends think J.S was a Real World season...and they think there going to be on the next challenge.
Anyways this could be a good concept and I think it could happen maybe in the future when Jersey Shore starts to suck...
[QUOTE=Blueprint;159152]Not only is this a good idea, but it could help both J.S. and The RW/RR Challenges. The only reason why I'm posting is because my local radio station were talking about it. They all said it would be a good idea and they wanted to see more of Jwows ***** haha.
I'm not sure but I think I heard that Ronnie, Mike, and Jwow are fans of the challenges, and that they tried out for the Real World.
Mostly all my friends think J.S was a Real World season...and they think there going to be on the next challenge.
Anyways this could be a good concept and I think it could happen maybe in the future when Jersey Shore starts to suck...[/QUOTE]
BMP casting are STUPID for not casting some of the jersey shore kids onto a real world season if they did try out...it definitely would've helped ratings.
I watched somewhere in the neighborhood of 30 seconds of Jersey Shore, so casting them would not in any way appeal to me.
That aside, I am sure it would be good for ratings - at least in the short term. Then of course it would probably be the final stake driven into the series, pushing it off the air sooner than it would have been without such a classless intervention...
Of course, Fresh Meat is already doing that, so I guess what is there to lose?
[QUOTE=faceless;159172]LOL at people hating on FM for not being on RW or RR yet want Jersey Shore on challenges. Jersey Shore cast being on the challenges would be horrible.[/QUOTE]
tjhallow likes this.
So when the hills or laguna beach first came did people want them on challenges too? You people need to realize that this JS thing isn't going to last. I'm already getting sick of reading/hearing about them on every website/ magazine and I was obsessed with the show.
[QUOTE=tjhallow;159174]tjhallow likes this.
So when the hills or laguna beach first came did people want them on challenges too? You people need to realize that this JS thing isn't going to last. [B]I'm already getting sick of reading/hearing about them on every website/ magazine and I was obsessed with the show.[/B][/QUOTE]
Ah, welcome back to the world of normalcy.
Pages