Who here thinks the newer generation challengers are better competitors than the older challengers? I've seen new school challenge fans state that some of the older challengers wouldn't cut it in todays challenges because they're more physically demanding, which is laughable.
They are a lot more physically demanding than older missions but I don't agree.
Right! Though the older challenges had physically demanding missions too, the Extreme Challenge for example had several of them.
I'm still waiting for that one amateur new school fan to come along and state that they're not.
They did have some but a lot of the missions back in the day were less extreme.
Who here thinks the newer generation challengers are better competitors than the older challengers? I've seen new school challenge fans state that some of the older challengers wouldn't cut it in todays challenges because they're more physically demanding, which is laughable.
They are a lot more physically demanding than older missions but I don't agree.
Right! Though the older challenges had physically demanding missions too, the Extreme Challenge for example had several of them.
I'm still waiting for that one amateur new school fan to come along and state that they're not.
They did have some but a lot of the missions back in the day were less extreme.
Do you think a new school team of Zach, Frank, Jordan, Leroy, CJ, Dustin is better (in their primes) than a old school team of Eric Nies, James, Shane, Adam Larson, Jamie and Christian?
Who here thinks the newer generation challengers are better competitors than the older challengers? I've seen new school challenge fans state that some of the older challengers wouldn't cut it in todays challenges because they're more physically demanding, which is laughable.
They are a lot more physically demanding than older missions but I don't agree.
Right! Though the older challenges had physically demanding missions too, the Extreme Challenge for example had several of them.
I'm still waiting for that one amateur new school fan to come along and state that they're not.
They did have some but a lot of the missions back in the day were less extreme.
Do you think a new school team of Zach, Frank, Jordan, Leroy, CJ, Dustin is better (in their primes) than a old school team of Eric Nies, James, Shane, Adam Larson, Jamie and Christian?
Who here thinks the newer generation challengers are better competitors than the older challengers? I've seen new school challenge fans state that some of the older challengers wouldn't cut it in todays challenges because they're more physically demanding, which is laughable.
They are a lot more physically demanding than older missions but I don't agree.
Right! Though the older challenges had physically demanding missions too, the Extreme Challenge for example had several of them.
I'm still waiting for that one amateur new school fan to come along and state that they're not.
They did have some but a lot of the missions back in the day were less extreme.
Do you think a new school team of Zach, Frank, Jordan, Leroy, CJ, Dustin is better (in their primes) than a old school team of Eric Nies, James, Shane, Adam Larson, Jamie and Christian?
I'm only talking about missions not people .
I know, but I want to get your understanding of competitors.
Superboy from ER (also Paul Anderson from Youtube I think).
He is the reason anybody (who didn't see it when they first aired) has been able to watch the 1st 4 Challenges & the older RR seasons. Please tell me you have RW Back to New York somewhere, that is the main season of anything that I've been wanting to see.
Who here thinks the newer generation challengers are better competitors than the older challengers? I've seen new school challenge fans state that some of the older challengers wouldn't cut it in todays challenges because they're more physically demanding, which is laughable.
They are a lot more physically demanding than older missions but I don't agree.
Right! Though the older challenges had physically demanding missions too, the Extreme Challenge for example had several of them.
I'm still waiting for that one amateur new school fan to come along and state that they're not.
They did have some but a lot of the missions back in the day were less extreme.
Do you think a new school team of Zach, Frank, Jordan, Leroy, CJ, Dustin is better (in their primes) than a old school team of Eric Nies, James, Shane, Adam Larson, Jamie and Christian?
I'm only talking about missions not people .
I know, but I want to get your understanding of competitors.
No none of those would. The newer girls are better tho. Like laurel & Emily would school most of the old girls.
Superboy from ER (also Paul Anderson from Youtube I think).
He is the reason anybody (who didn't see it when they first aired) has been able to watch the 1st 4 Challenges & the older RR seasons. Please tell me you have RW Back to New York somewhere, that is the main season of anything that I've been wanting to see.
No sorry, I'm not a big enough Real World fan to have the seasons.
Who here thinks the newer generation challengers are better competitors than the older challengers? I've seen new school challenge fans state that some of the older challengers wouldn't cut it in todays challenges because they're more physically demanding, which is laughable.
They are a lot more physically demanding than older missions but I don't agree.
Right! Though the older challenges had physically demanding missions too, the Extreme Challenge for example had several of them.
I'm still waiting for that one amateur new school fan to come along and state that they're not.
They did have some but a lot of the missions back in the day were less extreme.
Do you think a new school team of Zach, Frank, Jordan, Leroy, CJ, Dustin is better (in their primes) than a old school team of Eric Nies, James, Shane, Adam Larson, Jamie and Christian?
I'm only talking about missions not people .
I know, but I want to get your understanding of competitors.
No none of those would. The newer girls are better tho. Like laurel & Emily would school most of the old girls.
I disagree. Evelyn is number one all time for me, but I think Rachel, Jodi, Holly S and Holly P can outperform Emily S (she hasn't shown enough individual mission performance mainly because of pair challenges). The newer challenges only has Evelyn, Laruel, Emily S, Cooke, Brittini and maybe KellyAnne as good female competitors, the older challenge however had numerous good female competiors.
Superboy from ER (also Paul Anderson from Youtube I think).
He is the reason anybody (who didn't see it when they first aired) has been able to watch the 1st 4 Challenges & the older RR seasons. Please tell me you have RW Back to New York somewhere, that is the main season of anything that I've been wanting to see.
No sorry, I'm not a big enough Real World fan to have the seasons.
Who here thinks the newer generation challengers are better competitors than the older challengers? I've seen new school challenge fans state that some of the older challengers wouldn't cut it in todays challenges because they're more physically demanding, which is laughable.
They are a lot more physically demanding than older missions but I don't agree.
Right! Though the older challenges had physically demanding missions too, the Extreme Challenge for example had several of them.
I'm still waiting for that one amateur new school fan to come along and state that they're not.
They did have some but a lot of the missions back in the day were less extreme.
Do you think a new school team of Zach, Frank, Jordan, Leroy, CJ, Dustin is better (in their primes) than a old school team of Eric Nies, James, Shane, Adam Larson, Jamie and Christian?
I'm only talking about missions not people .
I know, but I want to get your understanding of competitors.
No none of those would. The newer girls are better tho. Like laurel & Emily would school most of the old girls.
I disagree. Evelyn is number one all time for me, but I think Rachel, Jodi, Holly S and Holly P can outperform Emily S (she hasn't shown enough individual mission performance mainly because of pair challenges). The newer challenges only has Evelyn, Laruel, Emily S, Cooke, Brittini and maybe KellyAnne as good female competitors, the older challenge however had numerous good female competiors.
Most not all Evelyn is still number one.
None of those old school girls besides maybe maybe Rachel have a chance of taking out Emily anything physical.
Who here thinks the newer generation challengers are better competitors than the older challengers? I've seen new school challenge fans state that some of the older challengers wouldn't cut it in todays challenges because they're more physically demanding, which is laughable.
They are a lot more physically demanding than older missions but I don't agree.
Right! Though the older challenges had physically demanding missions too, the Extreme Challenge for example had several of them.
I'm still waiting for that one amateur new school fan to come along and state that they're not.
They did have some but a lot of the missions back in the day were less extreme.
Do you think a new school team of Zach, Frank, Jordan, Leroy, CJ, Dustin is better (in their primes) than a old school team of Eric Nies, James, Shane, Adam Larson, Jamie and Christian?
I'm only talking about missions not people .
I know, but I want to get your understanding of competitors.
No none of those would. The newer girls are better tho. Like laurel & Emily would school most of the old girls.
I disagree. Evelyn is number one all time for me, but I think Rachel, Jodi, Holly S and Holly P can outperform Emily S (she hasn't shown enough individual mission performance mainly because of pair challenges). The newer challenges only has Evelyn, Laruel, Emily S, Cooke, Brittini and maybe KellyAnne as good female competitors, the older challenge however had numerous good female competiors.
Most not all Evelyn is still number one. None of those old school girls besides maybe maybe Rachel have a chance of taking out Emily anything physical.
You can't just look at the physical though, because physically Laterrian would beat most challengers but he still was a ****** competitor. You have to look at overall ability (skill, athleticism, endurance and etc). But Holly S, Christena, Holly P and Jodi could take out Emily possibly. Emily looks so physically dominate because she defeated low tier competitors such as Melinda, Paula (that's right) and Cara Maria (when she was a weak competitor).
Who here thinks the newer generation challengers are better competitors than the older challengers? I've seen new school challenge fans state that some of the older challengers wouldn't cut it in todays challenges because they're more physically demanding, which is laughable.
They are a lot more physically demanding than older missions but I don't agree.
Right! Though the older challenges had physically demanding missions too, the Extreme Challenge for example had several of them.
I'm still waiting for that one amateur new school fan to come along and state that they're not.
They did have some but a lot of the missions back in the day were less extreme.
Do you think a new school team of Zach, Frank, Jordan, Leroy, CJ, Dustin is better (in their primes) than a old school team of Eric Nies, James, Shane, Adam Larson, Jamie and Christian?
I'm only talking about missions not people .
I know, but I want to get your understanding of competitors.
No none of those would. The newer girls are better tho. Like laurel & Emily would school most of the old girls.
I disagree. Evelyn is number one all time for me, but I think Rachel, Jodi, Holly S and Holly P can outperform Emily S (she hasn't shown enough individual mission performance mainly because of pair challenges). The newer challenges only has Evelyn, Laruel, Emily S, Cooke, Brittini and maybe KellyAnne as good female competitors, the older challenge however had numerous good female competiors.
Most not all Evelyn is still number one. None of those old school girls besides maybe maybe Rachel have a chance of taking out Emily anything physical.
You can't just look at the physical though, because physically Laterrian would beat most challengers but he still was a ****** competitor. You have to look at overall ability (skill, athleticism, endurance and etc). But Holly S, Christena, Holly P and Jodi could take out Emily possibly. Emily looks so physically dominate because she defeated low tier competitors such as Melinda, Paula (that's right) and Cara Maria (when she was a weak competitor).
Jodi lost to robin on the duel in something physical.....
Emily is physically dominant because she is extremely muscular.
She'd destroy Jodi.
Who here thinks the newer generation challengers are better competitors than the older challengers? I've seen new school challenge fans state that some of the older challengers wouldn't cut it in todays challenges because they're more physically demanding, which is laughable.
They are a lot more physically demanding than older missions but I don't agree.
Right! Though the older challenges had physically demanding missions too, the Extreme Challenge for example had several of them.
I'm still waiting for that one amateur new school fan to come along and state that they're not.
They did have some but a lot of the missions back in the day were less extreme.
Do you think a new school team of Zach, Frank, Jordan, Leroy, CJ, Dustin is better (in their primes) than a old school team of Eric Nies, James, Shane, Adam Larson, Jamie and Christian?
I'm only talking about missions not people .
I know, but I want to get your understanding of competitors.
No none of those would. The newer girls are better tho. Like laurel & Emily would school most of the old girls.
I disagree. Evelyn is number one all time for me, but I think Rachel, Jodi, Holly S and Holly P can outperform Emily S (she hasn't shown enough individual mission performance mainly because of pair challenges). The newer challenges only has Evelyn, Laruel, Emily S, Cooke, Brittini and maybe KellyAnne as good female competitors, the older challenge however had numerous good female competiors.
Most not all Evelyn is still number one. None of those old school girls besides maybe maybe Rachel have a chance of taking out Emily anything physical.
You can't just look at the physical though, because physically Laterrian would beat most challengers but he still was a ****** competitor. You have to look at overall ability (skill, athleticism, endurance and etc). But Holly S, Christena, Holly P and Jodi could take out Emily possibly. Emily looks so physically dominate because she defeated low tier competitors such as Melinda, Paula (that's right) and Cara Maria (when she was a weak competitor).
Jodi lost to robin on the duel in something physical..... Emily is physically dominant because she is extremely muscular. She'd destroy Jodi.
What mission was that? And from what I remember, Jodi did the best out of the females in Zip Up (Inferno 2).
Who here thinks the newer generation challengers are better competitors than the older challengers? I've seen new school challenge fans state that some of the older challengers wouldn't cut it in todays challenges because they're more physically demanding, which is laughable.
They are a lot more physically demanding than older missions but I don't agree.
Right! Though the older challenges had physically demanding missions too, the Extreme Challenge for example had several of them.
I'm still waiting for that one amateur new school fan to come along and state that they're not.
They did have some but a lot of the missions back in the day were less extreme.
Do you think a new school team of Zach, Frank, Jordan, Leroy, CJ, Dustin is better (in their primes) than a old school team of Eric Nies, James, Shane, Adam Larson, Jamie and Christian?
I'm only talking about missions not people .
I know, but I want to get your understanding of competitors.
No none of those would. The newer girls are better tho. Like laurel & Emily would school most of the old girls.
I disagree. Evelyn is number one all time for me, but I think Rachel, Jodi, Holly S and Holly P can outperform Emily S (she hasn't shown enough individual mission performance mainly because of pair challenges). The newer challenges only has Evelyn, Laruel, Emily S, Cooke, Brittini and maybe KellyAnne as good female competitors, the older challenge however had numerous good female competiors.
Most not all Evelyn is still number one. None of those old school girls besides maybe maybe Rachel have a chance of taking out Emily anything physical.
You can't just look at the physical though, because physically Laterrian would beat most challengers but he still was a ****** competitor. You have to look at overall ability (skill, athleticism, endurance and etc). But Holly S, Christena, Holly P and Jodi could take out Emily possibly. Emily looks so physically dominate because she defeated low tier competitors such as Melinda, Paula (that's right) and Cara Maria (when she was a weak competitor).
Jodi lost to robin on the duel in something physical..... Emily is physically dominant because she is extremely muscular. She'd destroy Jodi.
What mission was that? And from what I remember, Jodi did the best out of the females in Zip Up (Inferno 2).
okay starting episode 7 of seasons 2. it's titled I Do Not Like You Sam I Am which makes me think that i will like this episode because i, too, dislike sam
okay starting episode 7 of seasons 2. it's titled I Do Not Like You Sam I Am which makes me think that i will like this episode because i, too, dislike sam
I don't like Sam also but they are very disrespectful and hateful to her. I felt very sorry for her and the way they treated her is awful.
i think the missions on season 2 so far have been good. nothing too stupid yet i don't think. except it was kind of lame how they copped out on the oil wrestling challenge and basically ""played smart"" to benefit the alliance. i like that they're doing logged out as a mini final
i think the missions on season 2 so far have been good. nothing too stupid yet i don't think. except it was kind of lame how they copped out on the oil wrestling challenge and basically ""played smart"" to benefit the alliance. i like that they're doing logged out as a mini final
The oil wrestling was a letdown. I really liked the mission you're watching right now. It takes endurance, strength, strategy, and teamwork.
Who here thinks the newer generation challengers are better competitors than the older challengers? I've seen new school challenge fans state that some of the older challengers wouldn't cut it in todays challenges because they're more physically demanding, which is laughable.
They are a lot more physically demanding than older missions but I don't agree.
Right! Though the older challenges had physically demanding missions too, the Extreme Challenge for example had several of them.
I'm still waiting for that one amateur new school fan to come along and state that they're not.
They did have some but a lot of the missions back in the day were less extreme.
Do you think a new school team of Zach, Frank, Jordan, Leroy, CJ, Dustin is better (in their primes) than a old school team of Eric Nies, James, Shane, Adam Larson, Jamie and Christian?
I'm only talking about missions not people .
I know, but I want to get your understanding of competitors.
No none of those would. The newer girls are better tho. Like laurel & Emily would school most of the old girls.
I disagree. Evelyn is number one all time for me, but I think Rachel, Jodi, Holly S and Holly P can outperform Emily S (she hasn't shown enough individual mission performance mainly because of pair challenges). The newer challenges only has Evelyn, Laruel, Emily S, Cooke, Brittini and maybe KellyAnne as good female competitors, the older challenge however had numerous good female competiors.
Most not all Evelyn is still number one. None of those old school girls besides maybe maybe Rachel have a chance of taking out Emily anything physical.
You can't just look at the physical though, because physically Laterrian would beat most challengers but he still was a ****** competitor. You have to look at overall ability (skill, athleticism, endurance and etc). But Holly S, Christena, Holly P and Jodi could take out Emily possibly. Emily looks so physically dominate because she defeated low tier competitors such as Melinda, Paula (that's right) and Cara Maria (when she was a weak competitor).
Jodi lost to robin on the duel in something physical..... Emily is physically dominant because she is extremely muscular. She'd destroy Jodi.
What mission was that? And from what I remember, Jodi did the best out of the females in Zip Up (Inferno 2).
They did have some but a lot of the missions back in the day were less extreme.
I haven't recognize any of the members that were here when I first started out on this site several years ago. Were you a member in 2011?
Do you think a new school team of Zach, Frank, Jordan, Leroy, CJ, Dustin is better (in their primes) than a old school team of Eric Nies, James, Shane, Adam Larson, Jamie and Christian?
I'm only talking about missions not people .
I know, but I want to get your understanding of competitors.
Superboy from ER (also Paul Anderson from Youtube I think).
He is the reason anybody (who didn't see it when they first aired) has been able to watch the 1st 4 Challenges & the older RR seasons. Please tell me you have RW Back to New York somewhere, that is the main season of anything that I've been wanting to see.
DEAD
No none of those would. The newer girls are better tho. Like laurel & Emily would school most of the old girls.
No sorry, I'm not a big enough Real World fan to have the seasons.
I disagree. Evelyn is number one all time for me, but I think Rachel, Jodi, Holly S and Holly P can outperform Emily S (she hasn't shown enough individual mission performance mainly because of pair challenges). The newer challenges only has Evelyn, Laruel, Emily S, Cooke, Brittini and maybe KellyAnne as good female competitors, the older challenge however had numerous good female competiors.
****it lol oh well.
Most not all Evelyn is still number one.
None of those old school girls besides maybe maybe Rachel have a chance of taking out Emily anything physical.
You can't just look at the physical though, because physically Laterrian would beat most challengers but he still was a ****** competitor. You have to look at overall ability (skill, athleticism, endurance and etc). But Holly S, Christena, Holly P and Jodi could take out Emily possibly. Emily looks so physically dominate because she defeated low tier competitors such as Melinda, Paula (that's right) and Cara Maria (when she was a weak competitor).
I didn't even bother to respond that mocking because its so unamusing.
Umnnn. Have you seen Emily instagram lately?
No I haven't, and I'm talking those females in their primes (not currently).
Jodi lost to robin on the duel in something physical.....
Emily is physically dominant because she is extremely muscular.
She'd destroy Jodi.
What mission was that? And from what I remember, Jodi did the best out of the females in Zip Up (Inferno 2).
Push over, when they tied there hands together
okay starting episode 7 of seasons 2. it's titled I Do Not Like You Sam I Am which makes me think that i will like this episode because i, too, dislike sam
I don't like Sam also but they are very disrespectful and hateful to her. I felt very sorry for her and the way they treated her is awful.
i think the missions on season 2 so far have been good. nothing too stupid yet i don't think. except it was kind of lame how they copped out on the oil wrestling challenge and basically ""played smart"" to benefit the alliance. i like that they're doing logged out as a mini final
I liked Sam through out the show but she was unbearable on the reunion.
sarah is so ******* arrogant on every puzzle challenge i wanna kick her ***
and she even isn't that good at it... same with trivia
omg zach and frank are so mean jesus
YES SHE WAS THE WORST ON THE TRIVIA EPISODE ALSO she is so smug i want to fight her
Jodi lost to Beth, not Robin!
Pages